The right to protest and roadblocks: limits and criteria for their regulation, particularly within the bolivian legal system

This article analyzes the limits of the right to protest, particularly road blockades, within the framework of international law and the Bolivian legal system. It establishes that protest is a fundamental right derived from the freedoms of assembly and expression, and that, by its nature, it is not...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Pérez Arce, Christian Nelio
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales y Políticas, Universidad Nacional del Nordeste 2026
Materias:
Proportionality
public order
rights of third parties
Proporcionalidad
orden público
derechos de terceros
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unne.edu.ar/index.php/rcd/article/view/9226
Aporte de:
Revistas UNNE - Universidad Nacional del Noroeste (UNNE) de Universidad Nacional del Nordeste
id I48-R154-article-9226
record_format ojs
spelling I48-R154-article-92262026-04-04T14:28:56Z The right to protest and roadblocks: limits and criteria for their regulation, particularly within the bolivian legal system El derecho a la protesta y el bloqueo de vías: límites y criterios para su regulación, en particular en el ordenamiento jurídico boliviano Pérez Arce, Christian Nelio Proportionality public order rights of third parties Proporcionalidad orden público derechos de terceros This article analyzes the limits of the right to protest, particularly road blockades, within the framework of international law and the Bolivian legal system. It establishes that protest is a fundamental right derived from the freedoms of assembly and expression, and that, by its nature, it is not absolute. The study highlights that road blockades disproportionately affect the rights of others, impacting free movement, health, and the national economy. It concludes that there is no autonomous right to blockades within the legal system, identifying its political instrumentalization as a de facto action. Finally, a set of regulatory criteria is proposed to guarantee a balance between the exercise of dissent and the rule of law. El presente artículo analiza los límites del derecho a la protesta, particularmente el bloqueo de vías, en el marco del derecho internacional y el ordenamiento jurídico boliviano. Se establece que la protesta es un derecho fundamental derivado de las libertades de reunión y expresión, y que, por su naturaleza, no posee un carácter absoluto. El estudio destaca que los bloqueos de vías generan afectaciones desproporcionadas sobre los derechos de terceros, impactando la libre circulación, la salud y la economía nacional. Se concluye que no existe un derecho autónomo al bloqueo en el sistema normativo, identificando su instrumentalización política como una vía de hecho. Finalmente, se proponen un conjunto de criterios regulatorios orientados a garantizar el equilibrio entre el ejercicio del disenso y la vigencia del Estado Constitucional de Derecho. Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales y Políticas, Universidad Nacional del Nordeste 2026-04-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf text/xml application/epub+zip text/html https://revistas.unne.edu.ar/index.php/rcd/article/view/9226 10.30972/rcd.519226 Research Journal of the Faculty of Law and Social and Political Sciences – UNNE; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026); 1-21 Revista Científica de la Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales y Políticas; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2026); 1-21 2953-4232 spa https://revistas.unne.edu.ar/index.php/rcd/article/view/9226/9085 https://revistas.unne.edu.ar/index.php/rcd/article/view/9226/9098 https://revistas.unne.edu.ar/index.php/rcd/article/view/9226/9099 https://revistas.unne.edu.ar/index.php/rcd/article/view/9226/9100 Derechos de autor 2026 Christian Nelio Pérez Arce https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
institution Universidad Nacional del Nordeste
institution_str I-48
repository_str R-154
container_title_str Revistas UNNE - Universidad Nacional del Noroeste (UNNE)
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Proportionality
public order
rights of third parties
Proporcionalidad
orden público
derechos de terceros
spellingShingle Proportionality
public order
rights of third parties
Proporcionalidad
orden público
derechos de terceros
Pérez Arce, Christian Nelio
The right to protest and roadblocks: limits and criteria for their regulation, particularly within the bolivian legal system
topic_facet Proportionality
public order
rights of third parties
Proporcionalidad
orden público
derechos de terceros
author Pérez Arce, Christian Nelio
author_facet Pérez Arce, Christian Nelio
author_sort Pérez Arce, Christian Nelio
title The right to protest and roadblocks: limits and criteria for their regulation, particularly within the bolivian legal system
title_short The right to protest and roadblocks: limits and criteria for their regulation, particularly within the bolivian legal system
title_full The right to protest and roadblocks: limits and criteria for their regulation, particularly within the bolivian legal system
title_fullStr The right to protest and roadblocks: limits and criteria for their regulation, particularly within the bolivian legal system
title_full_unstemmed The right to protest and roadblocks: limits and criteria for their regulation, particularly within the bolivian legal system
title_sort right to protest and roadblocks: limits and criteria for their regulation, particularly within the bolivian legal system
description This article analyzes the limits of the right to protest, particularly road blockades, within the framework of international law and the Bolivian legal system. It establishes that protest is a fundamental right derived from the freedoms of assembly and expression, and that, by its nature, it is not absolute. The study highlights that road blockades disproportionately affect the rights of others, impacting free movement, health, and the national economy. It concludes that there is no autonomous right to blockades within the legal system, identifying its political instrumentalization as a de facto action. Finally, a set of regulatory criteria is proposed to guarantee a balance between the exercise of dissent and the rule of law.
publisher Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales y Políticas, Universidad Nacional del Nordeste
publishDate 2026
url https://revistas.unne.edu.ar/index.php/rcd/article/view/9226
work_keys_str_mv AT perezarcechristiannelio therighttoprotestandroadblockslimitsandcriteriafortheirregulationparticularlywithinthebolivianlegalsystem
AT perezarcechristiannelio elderechoalaprotestayelbloqueodeviaslimitesycriteriosparasuregulacionenparticularenelordenamientojuridicoboliviano
AT perezarcechristiannelio righttoprotestandroadblockslimitsandcriteriafortheirregulationparticularlywithinthebolivianlegalsystem
first_indexed 2026-04-17T05:00:58Z
last_indexed 2026-04-17T05:00:58Z
_version_ 1862692564504674304

Ejemplares similares