Deference and judicial control: from Chevron to Loper Bright Enterprises. The lessons of American administrative law
The author of this article analyzes American administrative law based on deference and judicial control, understanding that the appearance of these techniques focuses on the conception of the division of powers that has been presented in the scenario of said country. For this purpose, it identifies...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales y Políticas, Universidad Nacional del Nordeste
2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unne.edu.ar/index.php/rcd/article/view/9194 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I48-R154-article-9194 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional del Nordeste |
| institution_str |
I-48 |
| repository_str |
R-154 |
| container_title_str |
Revistas UNNE - Universidad Nacional del Noroeste (UNNE) |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
deference theory judicial system of administration division of powers supremacy of the Constitution teoría de la deferencia sistema judicialista de la administración división de poderes supremacía de la Constitución |
| spellingShingle |
deference theory judicial system of administration division of powers supremacy of the Constitution teoría de la deferencia sistema judicialista de la administración división de poderes supremacía de la Constitución Huamán Ordóñez, Luís Alberto Deference and judicial control: from Chevron to Loper Bright Enterprises. The lessons of American administrative law |
| topic_facet |
deference theory judicial system of administration division of powers supremacy of the Constitution teoría de la deferencia sistema judicialista de la administración división de poderes supremacía de la Constitución |
| author |
Huamán Ordóñez, Luís Alberto |
| author_facet |
Huamán Ordóñez, Luís Alberto |
| author_sort |
Huamán Ordóñez, Luís Alberto |
| title |
Deference and judicial control: from Chevron to Loper Bright Enterprises. The lessons of American administrative law |
| title_short |
Deference and judicial control: from Chevron to Loper Bright Enterprises. The lessons of American administrative law |
| title_full |
Deference and judicial control: from Chevron to Loper Bright Enterprises. The lessons of American administrative law |
| title_fullStr |
Deference and judicial control: from Chevron to Loper Bright Enterprises. The lessons of American administrative law |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Deference and judicial control: from Chevron to Loper Bright Enterprises. The lessons of American administrative law |
| title_sort |
deference and judicial control: from chevron to loper bright enterprises. the lessons of american administrative law |
| description |
The author of this article analyzes American administrative law based on deference and judicial control, understanding that the appearance of these techniques focuses on the conception of the division of powers that has been presented in the scenario of said country. For this purpose, it identifies the Marbury v. Madison case as the space where the proclamation of the supremacy of the Constitution over government affairs within political discretion takes shape. Then it goes on to analyze the appearance of the agencies as legal-public organizations with special authorization from the Congress of the Union for the clear purposes for which they have been generated. It reaches the moment where it is dedicated, in addition to other related pronouncements, to the analysis of the Chevron ruling through which the possibility is admitted that it is the administration that interprets the legal regulation in situations of ambiguity and reasonableness. Finally, we arrive at the current state in which the Loper Bright Enterprises ruling overturns the deferential position of the courts towards public administration. With the use of hermeneutic and historical techniques, he concludes that the change renews the judicial control established in American judges, although said verdict omits to define the measure of said technique in the face of discretion, having a referential impact on administrative law. Peruvian considering that the deference of judges before the specialized authority does not conflict with the judicial system of the administration. |
| publisher |
Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales y Políticas, Universidad Nacional del Nordeste |
| publishDate |
2026 |
| url |
https://revistas.unne.edu.ar/index.php/rcd/article/view/9194 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT huamanordonezluisalberto deferenceandjudicialcontrolfromchevrontoloperbrightenterprisesthelessonsofamericanadministrativelaw AT huamanordonezluisalberto deferenciaycontroljudicialdechevronaloperbrightenterpriseslasleccionesdelderechoadministrativoestadounidense |
| first_indexed |
2026-04-17T05:00:52Z |
| last_indexed |
2026-04-17T05:00:52Z |
| _version_ |
1862692558891646976 |
| spelling |
I48-R154-article-91942026-04-14T09:49:07Z Deference and judicial control: from Chevron to Loper Bright Enterprises. The lessons of American administrative law Deferencia y control judicial: de Chevron a Loper Bright Enterprises. Las lecciones del derecho administrativo estadounidense Huamán Ordóñez, Luís Alberto deference theory judicial system of administration division of powers supremacy of the Constitution teoría de la deferencia sistema judicialista de la administración división de poderes supremacía de la Constitución The author of this article analyzes American administrative law based on deference and judicial control, understanding that the appearance of these techniques focuses on the conception of the division of powers that has been presented in the scenario of said country. For this purpose, it identifies the Marbury v. Madison case as the space where the proclamation of the supremacy of the Constitution over government affairs within political discretion takes shape. Then it goes on to analyze the appearance of the agencies as legal-public organizations with special authorization from the Congress of the Union for the clear purposes for which they have been generated. It reaches the moment where it is dedicated, in addition to other related pronouncements, to the analysis of the Chevron ruling through which the possibility is admitted that it is the administration that interprets the legal regulation in situations of ambiguity and reasonableness. Finally, we arrive at the current state in which the Loper Bright Enterprises ruling overturns the deferential position of the courts towards public administration. With the use of hermeneutic and historical techniques, he concludes that the change renews the judicial control established in American judges, although said verdict omits to define the measure of said technique in the face of discretion, having a referential impact on administrative law. Peruvian considering that the deference of judges before the specialized authority does not conflict with the judicial system of the administration. El autor del presente artículo analiza el derecho administrativo estadounidense a partir de la deferencia y el control judicial entendiendo que la aparición de dichas técnicas se centra en la concepción de la división de poderes que se ha presentado en el escenario de dicho país. Para tal propósito, identifica el caso Marbury v. Madison como el espacio donde se concreta la proclama de la supremacía de la Constitución frente a los asuntos del gobierno dentro de la discrecionalidad política. Luego pasa al análisis de la aparición de las agencias como organizaciones jurídico-públicas con especial habilitación del Congreso de la Unión para los claros fines para los cuales han sido generadas. Llega al momento en donde se dedica, además de otros pronunciamientos conexos, al análisis de la sentencia Chevron a través de la cual se admite la posibilidad de que sea la administración quien interprete la regulación jurídica en situaciones de ambigüedad y razonabilidad. Por último, arriba al estado actual en el que la sentencia Loper Bright Enterprises derriba la posición deferente de los tribunales hacia la administración pública. Con el uso de las técnicas hermenéutica e histórica, llega a la conclusión de que el cambio renueva el control judicial asentado en los jueces estadounidenses, aunque dicho veredicto omite definir la medida de dicha técnica frente a la discrecionalidad teniendo un impacto referencial en el derecho administrativo peruano atendiendo a que la deferencia de los jueces ante la autoridad especializada no riñe con el sistema judicialista de la administración. Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales y Políticas, Universidad Nacional del Nordeste 2026-03-27 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf text/xml application/epub+zip text/html https://revistas.unne.edu.ar/index.php/rcd/article/view/9194 10.30972/rcd.519194 Research Journal of the Faculty of Law and Social and Political Sciences – UNNE; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026); 1-28 Revista Científica de la Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales y Políticas; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2026); 1-28 2953-4232 spa https://revistas.unne.edu.ar/index.php/rcd/article/view/9194/9059 https://revistas.unne.edu.ar/index.php/rcd/article/view/9194/9061 https://revistas.unne.edu.ar/index.php/rcd/article/view/9194/9134 https://revistas.unne.edu.ar/index.php/rcd/article/view/9194/9073 Derechos de autor 2026 Luís Alberto Huamán Ordóñez https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |