Structure and dynamics conspire in the evolution of affinity between intrinsically disordered proteins

In every established species, protein-protein interactions have evolved such that they are fit for purpose. However, the molecular details of the evolution of new protein-protein interactions are poorly understood. We have used nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to investigate the changes in st...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jemth, P., Karlsson, E., Vögeli, B., Guzovsky, B., Andersson, E., Hultqvist, G., Dogan, J., Güntert, P., Riek, R., Chi, C.N.
Formato: JOUR
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_23752548_v4_n10_p_Jemth
Aporte de:
id todo:paper_23752548_v4_n10_p_Jemth
record_format dspace
spelling todo:paper_23752548_v4_n10_p_Jemth2023-10-03T16:41:18Z Structure and dynamics conspire in the evolution of affinity between intrinsically disordered proteins Jemth, P. Karlsson, E. Vögeli, B. Guzovsky, B. Andersson, E. Hultqvist, G. Dogan, J. Güntert, P. Riek, R. Chi, C.N. Dynamics Magnetic domains Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy Inter-domain interactions Intrinsically disordered proteins Isothermal calorimetry Protein-protein complexes Protein-protein interactions Solvent accessible surface areas Structure and dynamics Transcriptional coregulators Proteins In every established species, protein-protein interactions have evolved such that they are fit for purpose. However, the molecular details of the evolution of new protein-protein interactions are poorly understood. We have used nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to investigate the changes in structure and dynamics during the evolution of a protein-protein interaction involving the intrinsically disordered CREBBP (CREB-binding protein) interaction domain (CID) and nuclear coactivator binding domain (NCBD) from the transcriptional coregulators NCOA (nuclear receptor coactivator) and CREBBP/p300, respectively. The most ancient low-affinity "Cambrian-like" [540 to 600 million years (Ma) ago] CID/NCBD complex contained less secondary structure and was more dynamic than the complexes from an evolutionarily younger "Ordovician-Silurian" fish ancestor (ca. 440 Ma ago) and extant human. The most ancient Cambrian-like CID/NCBD complex lacked one helix and several interdomain interactions, resulting in a larger solvent-accessible surface area. Furthermore, the most ancient complex had a high degree of millisecond-to-microsecond dynamics distributed along the entire sequences of both CID and NCBD. These motions were reduced in the Ordovician-Silurian CID/NCBD complex and further redistributed in the extant human CID/NCBD complex. Isothermal calorimetry experiments show that complex formation is enthalpically favorable and that affinity is modulated by a largely unfavorable entropic contribution to binding. Our data demonstrate how changes in structure and motion conspire to shape affinity during the evolution of a protein-protein complex and provide direct evidence for the role of structural, dynamic, and frustrational plasticity in the evolution of interactions between intrinsically disordered proteins. Copyright © 2018 The Authors, some rights reserved. JOUR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_23752548_v4_n10_p_Jemth
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-134
collection Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA)
topic Dynamics
Magnetic domains
Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Inter-domain interactions
Intrinsically disordered proteins
Isothermal calorimetry
Protein-protein complexes
Protein-protein interactions
Solvent accessible surface areas
Structure and dynamics
Transcriptional coregulators
Proteins
spellingShingle Dynamics
Magnetic domains
Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Inter-domain interactions
Intrinsically disordered proteins
Isothermal calorimetry
Protein-protein complexes
Protein-protein interactions
Solvent accessible surface areas
Structure and dynamics
Transcriptional coregulators
Proteins
Jemth, P.
Karlsson, E.
Vögeli, B.
Guzovsky, B.
Andersson, E.
Hultqvist, G.
Dogan, J.
Güntert, P.
Riek, R.
Chi, C.N.
Structure and dynamics conspire in the evolution of affinity between intrinsically disordered proteins
topic_facet Dynamics
Magnetic domains
Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Inter-domain interactions
Intrinsically disordered proteins
Isothermal calorimetry
Protein-protein complexes
Protein-protein interactions
Solvent accessible surface areas
Structure and dynamics
Transcriptional coregulators
Proteins
description In every established species, protein-protein interactions have evolved such that they are fit for purpose. However, the molecular details of the evolution of new protein-protein interactions are poorly understood. We have used nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to investigate the changes in structure and dynamics during the evolution of a protein-protein interaction involving the intrinsically disordered CREBBP (CREB-binding protein) interaction domain (CID) and nuclear coactivator binding domain (NCBD) from the transcriptional coregulators NCOA (nuclear receptor coactivator) and CREBBP/p300, respectively. The most ancient low-affinity "Cambrian-like" [540 to 600 million years (Ma) ago] CID/NCBD complex contained less secondary structure and was more dynamic than the complexes from an evolutionarily younger "Ordovician-Silurian" fish ancestor (ca. 440 Ma ago) and extant human. The most ancient Cambrian-like CID/NCBD complex lacked one helix and several interdomain interactions, resulting in a larger solvent-accessible surface area. Furthermore, the most ancient complex had a high degree of millisecond-to-microsecond dynamics distributed along the entire sequences of both CID and NCBD. These motions were reduced in the Ordovician-Silurian CID/NCBD complex and further redistributed in the extant human CID/NCBD complex. Isothermal calorimetry experiments show that complex formation is enthalpically favorable and that affinity is modulated by a largely unfavorable entropic contribution to binding. Our data demonstrate how changes in structure and motion conspire to shape affinity during the evolution of a protein-protein complex and provide direct evidence for the role of structural, dynamic, and frustrational plasticity in the evolution of interactions between intrinsically disordered proteins. Copyright © 2018 The Authors, some rights reserved.
format JOUR
author Jemth, P.
Karlsson, E.
Vögeli, B.
Guzovsky, B.
Andersson, E.
Hultqvist, G.
Dogan, J.
Güntert, P.
Riek, R.
Chi, C.N.
author_facet Jemth, P.
Karlsson, E.
Vögeli, B.
Guzovsky, B.
Andersson, E.
Hultqvist, G.
Dogan, J.
Güntert, P.
Riek, R.
Chi, C.N.
author_sort Jemth, P.
title Structure and dynamics conspire in the evolution of affinity between intrinsically disordered proteins
title_short Structure and dynamics conspire in the evolution of affinity between intrinsically disordered proteins
title_full Structure and dynamics conspire in the evolution of affinity between intrinsically disordered proteins
title_fullStr Structure and dynamics conspire in the evolution of affinity between intrinsically disordered proteins
title_full_unstemmed Structure and dynamics conspire in the evolution of affinity between intrinsically disordered proteins
title_sort structure and dynamics conspire in the evolution of affinity between intrinsically disordered proteins
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_23752548_v4_n10_p_Jemth
work_keys_str_mv AT jemthp structureanddynamicsconspireintheevolutionofaffinitybetweenintrinsicallydisorderedproteins
AT karlssone structureanddynamicsconspireintheevolutionofaffinitybetweenintrinsicallydisorderedproteins
AT vogelib structureanddynamicsconspireintheevolutionofaffinitybetweenintrinsicallydisorderedproteins
AT guzovskyb structureanddynamicsconspireintheevolutionofaffinitybetweenintrinsicallydisorderedproteins
AT anderssone structureanddynamicsconspireintheevolutionofaffinitybetweenintrinsicallydisorderedproteins
AT hultqvistg structureanddynamicsconspireintheevolutionofaffinitybetweenintrinsicallydisorderedproteins
AT doganj structureanddynamicsconspireintheevolutionofaffinitybetweenintrinsicallydisorderedproteins
AT guntertp structureanddynamicsconspireintheevolutionofaffinitybetweenintrinsicallydisorderedproteins
AT riekr structureanddynamicsconspireintheevolutionofaffinitybetweenintrinsicallydisorderedproteins
AT chicn structureanddynamicsconspireintheevolutionofaffinitybetweenintrinsicallydisorderedproteins
_version_ 1807315684225449984