Comparison between exact and approximate treatments of the pairing interaction for finite fermi systems

As a model for a deformed nucleus the many level pairing model (picket fence model with 100 levels) is considered in four approximations and compared to the exact solution given by Richardson long time ago. It is found that, as usual, the number projected BCS method improves over standard BCS but th...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dukelsky, J., Dussel, G.G., Hirsch, J.G., Schuck, P.
Formato: JOUR
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_03759474_v714_n1-2_p63_Dukelsky
Aporte de:
id todo:paper_03759474_v714_n1-2_p63_Dukelsky
record_format dspace
spelling todo:paper_03759474_v714_n1-2_p63_Dukelsky2023-10-03T15:30:47Z Comparison between exact and approximate treatments of the pairing interaction for finite fermi systems Dukelsky, J. Dussel, G.G. Hirsch, J.G. Schuck, P. As a model for a deformed nucleus the many level pairing model (picket fence model with 100 levels) is considered in four approximations and compared to the exact solution given by Richardson long time ago. It is found that, as usual, the number projected BCS method improves over standard BCS but that it is much less accurate than the more sophisticated many-body-approaches which are Coupled Cluster Theory (CCT) in its SUB2 version or Self-Consistent Random Phase Approximation (SCRPA). © 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. JOUR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_03759474_v714_n1-2_p63_Dukelsky
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-134
collection Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA)
description As a model for a deformed nucleus the many level pairing model (picket fence model with 100 levels) is considered in four approximations and compared to the exact solution given by Richardson long time ago. It is found that, as usual, the number projected BCS method improves over standard BCS but that it is much less accurate than the more sophisticated many-body-approaches which are Coupled Cluster Theory (CCT) in its SUB2 version or Self-Consistent Random Phase Approximation (SCRPA). © 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
format JOUR
author Dukelsky, J.
Dussel, G.G.
Hirsch, J.G.
Schuck, P.
spellingShingle Dukelsky, J.
Dussel, G.G.
Hirsch, J.G.
Schuck, P.
Comparison between exact and approximate treatments of the pairing interaction for finite fermi systems
author_facet Dukelsky, J.
Dussel, G.G.
Hirsch, J.G.
Schuck, P.
author_sort Dukelsky, J.
title Comparison between exact and approximate treatments of the pairing interaction for finite fermi systems
title_short Comparison between exact and approximate treatments of the pairing interaction for finite fermi systems
title_full Comparison between exact and approximate treatments of the pairing interaction for finite fermi systems
title_fullStr Comparison between exact and approximate treatments of the pairing interaction for finite fermi systems
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between exact and approximate treatments of the pairing interaction for finite fermi systems
title_sort comparison between exact and approximate treatments of the pairing interaction for finite fermi systems
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_03759474_v714_n1-2_p63_Dukelsky
work_keys_str_mv AT dukelskyj comparisonbetweenexactandapproximatetreatmentsofthepairinginteractionforfinitefermisystems
AT dusselgg comparisonbetweenexactandapproximatetreatmentsofthepairinginteractionforfinitefermisystems
AT hirschjg comparisonbetweenexactandapproximatetreatmentsofthepairinginteractionforfinitefermisystems
AT schuckp comparisonbetweenexactandapproximatetreatmentsofthepairinginteractionforfinitefermisystems
_version_ 1807319795176046592