Differential left hippocampal activation during retrieval with different types of reminders: An fMRI study of the reconsolidation process
Consolidated memories return to a labile state after the presentation of cues (reminders) associated with acquisition, followed by a period of stabilization (reconsolidation). However not all cues are equally effective in initiating the process, unpredictable cues triggered it, predictable cues do n...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Publicado: |
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_19326203_v11_n3_p_Forcato http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_19326203_v11_n3_p_Forcato |
Aporte de: |
id |
paper:paper_19326203_v11_n3_p_Forcato |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
paper:paper_19326203_v11_n3_p_Forcato2023-06-08T16:30:34Z Differential left hippocampal activation during retrieval with different types of reminders: An fMRI study of the reconsolidation process Forcato, Cecilia Bavassi, Mariana Luz Pedreira, Maria Eugenia comparative effectiveness controlled study functional magnetic resonance imaging hippocampus human information retrieval memory adolescent adult association female hippocampus learning male non-therapeutic research nuclear magnetic resonance imaging physiology recall reminder system young adult Adolescent Adult Association Learning Cues Female Hippocampus Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Memory Mental Recall Nontherapeutic Human Experimentation Reminder Systems Young Adult Consolidated memories return to a labile state after the presentation of cues (reminders) associated with acquisition, followed by a period of stabilization (reconsolidation). However not all cues are equally effective in initiating the process, unpredictable cues triggered it, predictable cues do not. We hypothesize that the different effects observed by the different reminder types on memory labilization-reconsolidation depend on a differential neural involvement during reminder presentation. To test it, we developed a declarative task and compared the efficacy of three reminder types in triggering the process in humans (Experiment 1). Finally, we compared the brain activation patterns between the different conditions using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) (Experiment 2). We confirmed that the unpredictable reminder is the most effective in initiating the labilization-reconsolidation process. Furthermore, only under this condition there was differential left hippocampal activation during its presentation.We suggest that the left hippocampus is detecting the incongruence between actual and past events and allows the memory to be updated. © 2016 Forcato et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Fil:Forcato, C. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. Fil:Bavassi, L. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. Fil:Pedreira, M.E. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. 2016 https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_19326203_v11_n3_p_Forcato http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_19326203_v11_n3_p_Forcato |
institution |
Universidad de Buenos Aires |
institution_str |
I-28 |
repository_str |
R-134 |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA) |
topic |
comparative effectiveness controlled study functional magnetic resonance imaging hippocampus human information retrieval memory adolescent adult association female hippocampus learning male non-therapeutic research nuclear magnetic resonance imaging physiology recall reminder system young adult Adolescent Adult Association Learning Cues Female Hippocampus Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Memory Mental Recall Nontherapeutic Human Experimentation Reminder Systems Young Adult |
spellingShingle |
comparative effectiveness controlled study functional magnetic resonance imaging hippocampus human information retrieval memory adolescent adult association female hippocampus learning male non-therapeutic research nuclear magnetic resonance imaging physiology recall reminder system young adult Adolescent Adult Association Learning Cues Female Hippocampus Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Memory Mental Recall Nontherapeutic Human Experimentation Reminder Systems Young Adult Forcato, Cecilia Bavassi, Mariana Luz Pedreira, Maria Eugenia Differential left hippocampal activation during retrieval with different types of reminders: An fMRI study of the reconsolidation process |
topic_facet |
comparative effectiveness controlled study functional magnetic resonance imaging hippocampus human information retrieval memory adolescent adult association female hippocampus learning male non-therapeutic research nuclear magnetic resonance imaging physiology recall reminder system young adult Adolescent Adult Association Learning Cues Female Hippocampus Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Memory Mental Recall Nontherapeutic Human Experimentation Reminder Systems Young Adult |
description |
Consolidated memories return to a labile state after the presentation of cues (reminders) associated with acquisition, followed by a period of stabilization (reconsolidation). However not all cues are equally effective in initiating the process, unpredictable cues triggered it, predictable cues do not. We hypothesize that the different effects observed by the different reminder types on memory labilization-reconsolidation depend on a differential neural involvement during reminder presentation. To test it, we developed a declarative task and compared the efficacy of three reminder types in triggering the process in humans (Experiment 1). Finally, we compared the brain activation patterns between the different conditions using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) (Experiment 2). We confirmed that the unpredictable reminder is the most effective in initiating the labilization-reconsolidation process. Furthermore, only under this condition there was differential left hippocampal activation during its presentation.We suggest that the left hippocampus is detecting the incongruence between actual and past events and allows the memory to be updated. © 2016 Forcato et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
author |
Forcato, Cecilia Bavassi, Mariana Luz Pedreira, Maria Eugenia |
author_facet |
Forcato, Cecilia Bavassi, Mariana Luz Pedreira, Maria Eugenia |
author_sort |
Forcato, Cecilia |
title |
Differential left hippocampal activation during retrieval with different types of reminders: An fMRI study of the reconsolidation process |
title_short |
Differential left hippocampal activation during retrieval with different types of reminders: An fMRI study of the reconsolidation process |
title_full |
Differential left hippocampal activation during retrieval with different types of reminders: An fMRI study of the reconsolidation process |
title_fullStr |
Differential left hippocampal activation during retrieval with different types of reminders: An fMRI study of the reconsolidation process |
title_full_unstemmed |
Differential left hippocampal activation during retrieval with different types of reminders: An fMRI study of the reconsolidation process |
title_sort |
differential left hippocampal activation during retrieval with different types of reminders: an fmri study of the reconsolidation process |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_19326203_v11_n3_p_Forcato http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_19326203_v11_n3_p_Forcato |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT forcatocecilia differentiallefthippocampalactivationduringretrievalwithdifferenttypesofremindersanfmristudyofthereconsolidationprocess AT bavassimarianaluz differentiallefthippocampalactivationduringretrievalwithdifferenttypesofremindersanfmristudyofthereconsolidationprocess AT pedreiramariaeugenia differentiallefthippocampalactivationduringretrievalwithdifferenttypesofremindersanfmristudyofthereconsolidationprocess |
_version_ |
1768546418320998400 |