Honeydew collection by the invasive garden ant Lasius neglectus versus the native ant L. grandis

Honeydew collection performed by the invasive ant Lasius neglectus and by the native ant L. grandis was compared. The invasive ant collected 2.09 kg of honeydew per tree while the native ant collected 0.82 kg. The aphid Lachnus roboris was visited by both ant species. In holm oaks colonized by L. ne...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Paris, Carolina Ivon
Publicado: 2009
Materias:
ant
Acceso en línea:https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_18728855_v3_n2_p75_Paris
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_18728855_v3_n2_p75_Paris
Aporte de:
id paper:paper_18728855_v3_n2_p75_Paris
record_format dspace
spelling paper:paper_18728855_v3_n2_p75_Paris2023-06-08T16:30:01Z Honeydew collection by the invasive garden ant Lasius neglectus versus the native ant L. grandis Paris, Carolina Ivon Aphid-ant mutualism Invasive ants Lachnus roboris Quercusilex abundance ant aphid biological production colonization honeydew invasive species mutualism Aphididae Cucumis melo var. inodorus Formicidae Hexapoda Hoplocallis picta Lachnus roboris Lasius neglectus Psocoptera Quercus Honeydew collection performed by the invasive ant Lasius neglectus and by the native ant L. grandis was compared. The invasive ant collected 2.09 kg of honeydew per tree while the native ant collected 0.82 kg. The aphid Lachnus roboris was visited by both ant species. In holm oaks colonized by L. neglectus, aphid abundance tended to increase and its honeydew production increased twofold. The percentage of untended aphids was lower in holm trees occupied by L. neglectus. As tending ants also prey on insects, we estimated the percentage of carried insects. The native ant workers carried more insects than the invasive ant. Both ant species preyed mainly on Psocoptera and the rarely tended aphid, Hoplocallis picta. We conclude that the higher honeydew collection achieved by L. neglectus was the consequence of (1) its greater abundance, which enabled this ant to tend more Lachnus roboris and (2) its greater level of attention towards promoting an increase of honeydew production. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009. Fil:Paris, C.I. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. 2009 https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_18728855_v3_n2_p75_Paris http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_18728855_v3_n2_p75_Paris
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-134
collection Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA)
topic Aphid-ant mutualism
Invasive ants
Lachnus roboris
Quercusilex
abundance
ant
aphid
biological production
colonization
honeydew
invasive species
mutualism
Aphididae
Cucumis melo var. inodorus
Formicidae
Hexapoda
Hoplocallis picta
Lachnus roboris
Lasius neglectus
Psocoptera
Quercus
spellingShingle Aphid-ant mutualism
Invasive ants
Lachnus roboris
Quercusilex
abundance
ant
aphid
biological production
colonization
honeydew
invasive species
mutualism
Aphididae
Cucumis melo var. inodorus
Formicidae
Hexapoda
Hoplocallis picta
Lachnus roboris
Lasius neglectus
Psocoptera
Quercus
Paris, Carolina Ivon
Honeydew collection by the invasive garden ant Lasius neglectus versus the native ant L. grandis
topic_facet Aphid-ant mutualism
Invasive ants
Lachnus roboris
Quercusilex
abundance
ant
aphid
biological production
colonization
honeydew
invasive species
mutualism
Aphididae
Cucumis melo var. inodorus
Formicidae
Hexapoda
Hoplocallis picta
Lachnus roboris
Lasius neglectus
Psocoptera
Quercus
description Honeydew collection performed by the invasive ant Lasius neglectus and by the native ant L. grandis was compared. The invasive ant collected 2.09 kg of honeydew per tree while the native ant collected 0.82 kg. The aphid Lachnus roboris was visited by both ant species. In holm oaks colonized by L. neglectus, aphid abundance tended to increase and its honeydew production increased twofold. The percentage of untended aphids was lower in holm trees occupied by L. neglectus. As tending ants also prey on insects, we estimated the percentage of carried insects. The native ant workers carried more insects than the invasive ant. Both ant species preyed mainly on Psocoptera and the rarely tended aphid, Hoplocallis picta. We conclude that the higher honeydew collection achieved by L. neglectus was the consequence of (1) its greater abundance, which enabled this ant to tend more Lachnus roboris and (2) its greater level of attention towards promoting an increase of honeydew production. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009.
author Paris, Carolina Ivon
author_facet Paris, Carolina Ivon
author_sort Paris, Carolina Ivon
title Honeydew collection by the invasive garden ant Lasius neglectus versus the native ant L. grandis
title_short Honeydew collection by the invasive garden ant Lasius neglectus versus the native ant L. grandis
title_full Honeydew collection by the invasive garden ant Lasius neglectus versus the native ant L. grandis
title_fullStr Honeydew collection by the invasive garden ant Lasius neglectus versus the native ant L. grandis
title_full_unstemmed Honeydew collection by the invasive garden ant Lasius neglectus versus the native ant L. grandis
title_sort honeydew collection by the invasive garden ant lasius neglectus versus the native ant l. grandis
publishDate 2009
url https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_18728855_v3_n2_p75_Paris
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_18728855_v3_n2_p75_Paris
work_keys_str_mv AT pariscarolinaivon honeydewcollectionbytheinvasivegardenantlasiusneglectusversusthenativeantlgrandis
_version_ 1768544102829260800