Gene regulatory network architecture in different developmental contexts influences the genetic basis of morphological evolution

Convergent phenotypic evolution is often caused by recurrent changes at particular nodes in the underlying gene regulatory networks (GRNs). The genes at such evolutionary ‘hotspots’ are thought to maximally affect the phenotype with minimal pleiotropic consequences. This has led to the suggestion th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado: 2018
Materias:
leg
Acceso en línea:https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_15537390_v14_n5_p_Kittelmann
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_15537390_v14_n5_p_Kittelmann
Aporte de:
id paper:paper_15537390_v14_n5_p_Kittelmann
record_format dspace
spelling paper:paper_15537390_v14_n5_p_Kittelmann2023-06-08T16:23:11Z Gene regulatory network architecture in different developmental contexts influences the genetic basis of morphological evolution microRNA microRNA 92a transcription factor transcription factor shavenbaby unclassified drug DNA binding protein Drosophila protein microRNA MIRN92 microRNA, Drosophila ovo protein, Drosophila transcription factor animal tissue Article controlled study convergent evolution Drosophila melanogaster ectopic expression embryo enhancer region exon femur gene expression gene regulatory network gene repression leg morphological adaptation nonhuman pupa reporter gene repressor gene RNA sequence trichome animal animal structures classification gene expression regulation genetics growth, development and aging larva metabolism molecular evolution mutation transgenic animal Animal Structures Animals Animals, Genetically Modified DNA-Binding Proteins Drosophila melanogaster Drosophila Proteins Evolution, Molecular Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental Gene Regulatory Networks Larva MicroRNAs Mutation Transcription Factors Convergent phenotypic evolution is often caused by recurrent changes at particular nodes in the underlying gene regulatory networks (GRNs). The genes at such evolutionary ‘hotspots’ are thought to maximally affect the phenotype with minimal pleiotropic consequences. This has led to the suggestion that if a GRN is understood in sufficient detail, the path of evolution may be predictable. The repeated evolutionary loss of larval trichomes among Drosophila species is caused by the loss of shavenbaby (svb) expression. svb is also required for development of leg trichomes, but the evolutionary gain of trichomes in the ‘naked valley’ on T2 femurs in Drosophila melanogaster is caused by reduced microRNA-92a (miR-92a) expression rather than changes in svb. We compared the expression and function of components between the larval and leg trichome GRNs to investigate why the genetic basis of trichome pattern evolution differs in these developmental contexts. We found key differences between the two networks in both the genes employed, and in the regulation and function of common genes. These differences in the GRNs reveal why mutations in svb are unlikely to contribute to leg trichome evolution and how instead miR-92a represents the key evolutionary switch in this context. Our work shows that variability in GRNs across different developmental contexts, as well as whether a morphological feature is lost versus gained, influence the nodes at which a GRN evolves to cause morphological change. Therefore, our findings have important implications for understanding the pathways and predictability of evolution. © 2018 Kittelmann et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 2018 https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_15537390_v14_n5_p_Kittelmann http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_15537390_v14_n5_p_Kittelmann
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-134
collection Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA)
topic microRNA
microRNA 92a
transcription factor
transcription factor shavenbaby
unclassified drug
DNA binding protein
Drosophila protein
microRNA
MIRN92 microRNA, Drosophila
ovo protein, Drosophila
transcription factor
animal tissue
Article
controlled study
convergent evolution
Drosophila melanogaster
ectopic expression
embryo
enhancer region
exon
femur
gene expression
gene regulatory network
gene repression
leg
morphological adaptation
nonhuman
pupa
reporter gene
repressor gene
RNA sequence
trichome
animal
animal structures
classification
gene expression regulation
genetics
growth, development and aging
larva
metabolism
molecular evolution
mutation
transgenic animal
Animal Structures
Animals
Animals, Genetically Modified
DNA-Binding Proteins
Drosophila melanogaster
Drosophila Proteins
Evolution, Molecular
Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental
Gene Regulatory Networks
Larva
MicroRNAs
Mutation
Transcription Factors
spellingShingle microRNA
microRNA 92a
transcription factor
transcription factor shavenbaby
unclassified drug
DNA binding protein
Drosophila protein
microRNA
MIRN92 microRNA, Drosophila
ovo protein, Drosophila
transcription factor
animal tissue
Article
controlled study
convergent evolution
Drosophila melanogaster
ectopic expression
embryo
enhancer region
exon
femur
gene expression
gene regulatory network
gene repression
leg
morphological adaptation
nonhuman
pupa
reporter gene
repressor gene
RNA sequence
trichome
animal
animal structures
classification
gene expression regulation
genetics
growth, development and aging
larva
metabolism
molecular evolution
mutation
transgenic animal
Animal Structures
Animals
Animals, Genetically Modified
DNA-Binding Proteins
Drosophila melanogaster
Drosophila Proteins
Evolution, Molecular
Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental
Gene Regulatory Networks
Larva
MicroRNAs
Mutation
Transcription Factors
Gene regulatory network architecture in different developmental contexts influences the genetic basis of morphological evolution
topic_facet microRNA
microRNA 92a
transcription factor
transcription factor shavenbaby
unclassified drug
DNA binding protein
Drosophila protein
microRNA
MIRN92 microRNA, Drosophila
ovo protein, Drosophila
transcription factor
animal tissue
Article
controlled study
convergent evolution
Drosophila melanogaster
ectopic expression
embryo
enhancer region
exon
femur
gene expression
gene regulatory network
gene repression
leg
morphological adaptation
nonhuman
pupa
reporter gene
repressor gene
RNA sequence
trichome
animal
animal structures
classification
gene expression regulation
genetics
growth, development and aging
larva
metabolism
molecular evolution
mutation
transgenic animal
Animal Structures
Animals
Animals, Genetically Modified
DNA-Binding Proteins
Drosophila melanogaster
Drosophila Proteins
Evolution, Molecular
Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental
Gene Regulatory Networks
Larva
MicroRNAs
Mutation
Transcription Factors
description Convergent phenotypic evolution is often caused by recurrent changes at particular nodes in the underlying gene regulatory networks (GRNs). The genes at such evolutionary ‘hotspots’ are thought to maximally affect the phenotype with minimal pleiotropic consequences. This has led to the suggestion that if a GRN is understood in sufficient detail, the path of evolution may be predictable. The repeated evolutionary loss of larval trichomes among Drosophila species is caused by the loss of shavenbaby (svb) expression. svb is also required for development of leg trichomes, but the evolutionary gain of trichomes in the ‘naked valley’ on T2 femurs in Drosophila melanogaster is caused by reduced microRNA-92a (miR-92a) expression rather than changes in svb. We compared the expression and function of components between the larval and leg trichome GRNs to investigate why the genetic basis of trichome pattern evolution differs in these developmental contexts. We found key differences between the two networks in both the genes employed, and in the regulation and function of common genes. These differences in the GRNs reveal why mutations in svb are unlikely to contribute to leg trichome evolution and how instead miR-92a represents the key evolutionary switch in this context. Our work shows that variability in GRNs across different developmental contexts, as well as whether a morphological feature is lost versus gained, influence the nodes at which a GRN evolves to cause morphological change. Therefore, our findings have important implications for understanding the pathways and predictability of evolution. © 2018 Kittelmann et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title Gene regulatory network architecture in different developmental contexts influences the genetic basis of morphological evolution
title_short Gene regulatory network architecture in different developmental contexts influences the genetic basis of morphological evolution
title_full Gene regulatory network architecture in different developmental contexts influences the genetic basis of morphological evolution
title_fullStr Gene regulatory network architecture in different developmental contexts influences the genetic basis of morphological evolution
title_full_unstemmed Gene regulatory network architecture in different developmental contexts influences the genetic basis of morphological evolution
title_sort gene regulatory network architecture in different developmental contexts influences the genetic basis of morphological evolution
publishDate 2018
url https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_15537390_v14_n5_p_Kittelmann
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_15537390_v14_n5_p_Kittelmann
_version_ 1768542195663503360