Using integrative taxonomy and multispecies coalescent models for phylogeny reconstruction and species delimitation within the “Nastanthus–Gamocarpha” clade (Calyceraceae)

The Calyceraceae (47 spp.) is a small family of plants that is sister to the Asteraceae (∼ 25,000 spp.), one of the largest families of angiosperms. Most members of Calyceraceae are endemic to the Andes and Patagonia, representing an excellent model within which to study diversification patterns in...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado: 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_10557903_v130_n_p211_Denham
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_10557903_v130_n_p211_Denham
Aporte de:
id paper:paper_10557903_v130_n_p211_Denham
record_format dspace
spelling paper:paper_10557903_v130_n_p211_Denham2023-06-08T16:03:13Z Using integrative taxonomy and multispecies coalescent models for phylogeny reconstruction and species delimitation within the “Nastanthus–Gamocarpha” clade (Calyceraceae) Andean plants Coalescent models Morphology Phenology Species delimitation Species tree The Calyceraceae (47 spp.) is a small family of plants that is sister to the Asteraceae (∼ 25,000 spp.), one of the largest families of angiosperms. Most members of Calyceraceae are endemic to the Andes and Patagonia, representing an excellent model within which to study diversification patterns in these regions. The single phylogenetic study of Calyceraceae conducted to date revealed that the boundaries of most genera and several species of this family require further analyses, especially the “Nastanthus–Gamocarpha” clade. In this study, we reconstructed the phylogeny of the “Nastanthus–Gamocarpha” clade using multispecies coalescent models under BPP and StarBeast2 programs, sampling 63 individuals from 13 of the 14 species recognized to date. We then used this phylogenetic framework to delimit species using BFD and the A11 method implemented in BPP. Species limits suggested through a coalescent approach were then re-evaluated in the light of morphology, geography, and phenology. Coalescent-based methods indicated that most putative lineages could be recognized as distinct species. Morphological, geographical, ecological, and phenological data further supported species delimitation. Necessary taxonomic changes are proposed. Namely, the paraphyletic Nastanthus is synonymized under Gamocarpha, while five species of Boopis are transferred into Gamocarpha. We used an integrative taxonomic approach to recognize 13 species and one subspecies within the newly circumscribed genus Gamocarpha. © 2018 Elsevier Inc. 2019 https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_10557903_v130_n_p211_Denham http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_10557903_v130_n_p211_Denham
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-134
collection Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA)
topic Andean plants
Coalescent models
Morphology
Phenology
Species delimitation
Species tree
spellingShingle Andean plants
Coalescent models
Morphology
Phenology
Species delimitation
Species tree
Using integrative taxonomy and multispecies coalescent models for phylogeny reconstruction and species delimitation within the “Nastanthus–Gamocarpha” clade (Calyceraceae)
topic_facet Andean plants
Coalescent models
Morphology
Phenology
Species delimitation
Species tree
description The Calyceraceae (47 spp.) is a small family of plants that is sister to the Asteraceae (∼ 25,000 spp.), one of the largest families of angiosperms. Most members of Calyceraceae are endemic to the Andes and Patagonia, representing an excellent model within which to study diversification patterns in these regions. The single phylogenetic study of Calyceraceae conducted to date revealed that the boundaries of most genera and several species of this family require further analyses, especially the “Nastanthus–Gamocarpha” clade. In this study, we reconstructed the phylogeny of the “Nastanthus–Gamocarpha” clade using multispecies coalescent models under BPP and StarBeast2 programs, sampling 63 individuals from 13 of the 14 species recognized to date. We then used this phylogenetic framework to delimit species using BFD and the A11 method implemented in BPP. Species limits suggested through a coalescent approach were then re-evaluated in the light of morphology, geography, and phenology. Coalescent-based methods indicated that most putative lineages could be recognized as distinct species. Morphological, geographical, ecological, and phenological data further supported species delimitation. Necessary taxonomic changes are proposed. Namely, the paraphyletic Nastanthus is synonymized under Gamocarpha, while five species of Boopis are transferred into Gamocarpha. We used an integrative taxonomic approach to recognize 13 species and one subspecies within the newly circumscribed genus Gamocarpha. © 2018 Elsevier Inc.
title Using integrative taxonomy and multispecies coalescent models for phylogeny reconstruction and species delimitation within the “Nastanthus–Gamocarpha” clade (Calyceraceae)
title_short Using integrative taxonomy and multispecies coalescent models for phylogeny reconstruction and species delimitation within the “Nastanthus–Gamocarpha” clade (Calyceraceae)
title_full Using integrative taxonomy and multispecies coalescent models for phylogeny reconstruction and species delimitation within the “Nastanthus–Gamocarpha” clade (Calyceraceae)
title_fullStr Using integrative taxonomy and multispecies coalescent models for phylogeny reconstruction and species delimitation within the “Nastanthus–Gamocarpha” clade (Calyceraceae)
title_full_unstemmed Using integrative taxonomy and multispecies coalescent models for phylogeny reconstruction and species delimitation within the “Nastanthus–Gamocarpha” clade (Calyceraceae)
title_sort using integrative taxonomy and multispecies coalescent models for phylogeny reconstruction and species delimitation within the “nastanthus–gamocarpha” clade (calyceraceae)
publishDate 2019
url https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_10557903_v130_n_p211_Denham
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_10557903_v130_n_p211_Denham
_version_ 1768544003070885888