id paper:paper_0969806X_v153_n_p140_Ros
record_format dspace
spelling paper:paper_0969806X_v153_n_p140_Ros2023-06-08T15:59:07Z On the design of experiments based on plastic scintillators using GEANT4 simulations Coating Efficiency Geant4 simulations Plastic scintillator Pulses Coatings Cosmic rays Cosmology Design of experiments Earth (planet) Efficiency High energy physics Ionization Light Light absorption Orbits Photodetectors Photomultipliers Reflective coatings Scintillation counters Surface roughness Design parameters GEANT4 simulation Light collection efficiency Plastic scintillator Pulses Realistic conditions Scintillation photons Silicon photo multipliers (SiPM) Plastic coatings plastic Article cosmic radiation decay time constant electron transport energy transfer experimental design light material coating photon proton transport radiation absorption radiation physics refraction index scintigraphy scintillation signal detection simulation surface property time Plastic scintillators are widely used as particle detectors in many fields, mainly, medicine, particle physics and astrophysics. Traditionally, they are coupled to a photo-multiplier (PMT) but now silicon photo-multipliers (SiPM) are evolving as a promising robust alternative, specially in space born experiments since plastic scintillators may be a light option for low Earth orbit missions. Therefore it is timely to make a new analysis of the optimal design for experiments based on plastic scintillators in realistic conditions in such a configuration. We analyze here their response to an isotropic flux of electron and proton primaries in the energy range from 1 MeV to 1 GeV, a typical scenario for cosmic ray or space weather experiments, through detailed GEANT4 simulations. First, we focus on the effect of increasing the ratio between the plastic volume and the area of the photo-detector itself and, second, on the benefits of using a reflective coating around the plastic, the most common technique to increase light collection efficiency. In order to achieve a general approach, it is necessary to consider several detector setups. Therefore, we have performed a full set of simulations using the highly tested GEANT4 simulation tool: several parameters have been analyzed such as the energy lost in the coating, the deposited energy in the scintillator, the optical absorption, the fraction of scintillation photons that are not detected, the light collection at the photo-detector, the pulse shape and its time parameters and finally, other design parameters as the surface roughness, the coating reflectivity and the case of a scintillator with two decay components. This work could serve as a guide on the design of future experiments based on the use of plastic scintillators. © 2018 Elsevier Ltd 2018 https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_0969806X_v153_n_p140_Ros http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_0969806X_v153_n_p140_Ros
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-134
collection Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA)
topic Coating
Efficiency
Geant4 simulations
Plastic scintillator
Pulses
Coatings
Cosmic rays
Cosmology
Design of experiments
Earth (planet)
Efficiency
High energy physics
Ionization
Light
Light absorption
Orbits
Photodetectors
Photomultipliers
Reflective coatings
Scintillation counters
Surface roughness
Design parameters
GEANT4 simulation
Light collection efficiency
Plastic scintillator
Pulses
Realistic conditions
Scintillation photons
Silicon photo multipliers (SiPM)
Plastic coatings
plastic
Article
cosmic radiation
decay time constant
electron transport
energy transfer
experimental design
light
material coating
photon
proton transport
radiation absorption
radiation physics
refraction index
scintigraphy
scintillation
signal detection
simulation
surface property
time
spellingShingle Coating
Efficiency
Geant4 simulations
Plastic scintillator
Pulses
Coatings
Cosmic rays
Cosmology
Design of experiments
Earth (planet)
Efficiency
High energy physics
Ionization
Light
Light absorption
Orbits
Photodetectors
Photomultipliers
Reflective coatings
Scintillation counters
Surface roughness
Design parameters
GEANT4 simulation
Light collection efficiency
Plastic scintillator
Pulses
Realistic conditions
Scintillation photons
Silicon photo multipliers (SiPM)
Plastic coatings
plastic
Article
cosmic radiation
decay time constant
electron transport
energy transfer
experimental design
light
material coating
photon
proton transport
radiation absorption
radiation physics
refraction index
scintigraphy
scintillation
signal detection
simulation
surface property
time
On the design of experiments based on plastic scintillators using GEANT4 simulations
topic_facet Coating
Efficiency
Geant4 simulations
Plastic scintillator
Pulses
Coatings
Cosmic rays
Cosmology
Design of experiments
Earth (planet)
Efficiency
High energy physics
Ionization
Light
Light absorption
Orbits
Photodetectors
Photomultipliers
Reflective coatings
Scintillation counters
Surface roughness
Design parameters
GEANT4 simulation
Light collection efficiency
Plastic scintillator
Pulses
Realistic conditions
Scintillation photons
Silicon photo multipliers (SiPM)
Plastic coatings
plastic
Article
cosmic radiation
decay time constant
electron transport
energy transfer
experimental design
light
material coating
photon
proton transport
radiation absorption
radiation physics
refraction index
scintigraphy
scintillation
signal detection
simulation
surface property
time
description Plastic scintillators are widely used as particle detectors in many fields, mainly, medicine, particle physics and astrophysics. Traditionally, they are coupled to a photo-multiplier (PMT) but now silicon photo-multipliers (SiPM) are evolving as a promising robust alternative, specially in space born experiments since plastic scintillators may be a light option for low Earth orbit missions. Therefore it is timely to make a new analysis of the optimal design for experiments based on plastic scintillators in realistic conditions in such a configuration. We analyze here their response to an isotropic flux of electron and proton primaries in the energy range from 1 MeV to 1 GeV, a typical scenario for cosmic ray or space weather experiments, through detailed GEANT4 simulations. First, we focus on the effect of increasing the ratio between the plastic volume and the area of the photo-detector itself and, second, on the benefits of using a reflective coating around the plastic, the most common technique to increase light collection efficiency. In order to achieve a general approach, it is necessary to consider several detector setups. Therefore, we have performed a full set of simulations using the highly tested GEANT4 simulation tool: several parameters have been analyzed such as the energy lost in the coating, the deposited energy in the scintillator, the optical absorption, the fraction of scintillation photons that are not detected, the light collection at the photo-detector, the pulse shape and its time parameters and finally, other design parameters as the surface roughness, the coating reflectivity and the case of a scintillator with two decay components. This work could serve as a guide on the design of future experiments based on the use of plastic scintillators. © 2018 Elsevier Ltd
title On the design of experiments based on plastic scintillators using GEANT4 simulations
title_short On the design of experiments based on plastic scintillators using GEANT4 simulations
title_full On the design of experiments based on plastic scintillators using GEANT4 simulations
title_fullStr On the design of experiments based on plastic scintillators using GEANT4 simulations
title_full_unstemmed On the design of experiments based on plastic scintillators using GEANT4 simulations
title_sort on the design of experiments based on plastic scintillators using geant4 simulations
publishDate 2018
url https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_0969806X_v153_n_p140_Ros
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_0969806X_v153_n_p140_Ros
_version_ 1768542373781962752