Ambiguities in Bandt-Pompes methodology for local entropic quantifiers

The BandtPompe (BP) prescription for building up probability densities [C. Bandt, B. Pompe, Permutation entropy: a natural complexity measure for time series, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 174102] constituted a significant advance in the treatment of time-series. However, as we show here, ambiguities a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado: 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_03784371_v391_n8_p2518_Olivares
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_03784371_v391_n8_p2518_Olivares
Aporte de:
id paper:paper_03784371_v391_n8_p2518_Olivares
record_format dspace
spelling paper:paper_03784371_v391_n8_p2518_Olivares2023-06-08T15:40:16Z Ambiguities in Bandt-Pompes methodology for local entropic quantifiers BandtPompe probability distribution Fisher information measure Nonlinear time series analysis Shannon entropy Complexity measures Fisher information measures Illustrative examples Nonlinear time series analysis Ordinal pattern Permutation entropy Probability densities Shannon entropy Fisher information matrix Nonlinear dynamical systems Probability density function Probability distributions Time series analysis The BandtPompe (BP) prescription for building up probability densities [C. Bandt, B. Pompe, Permutation entropy: a natural complexity measure for time series, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 174102] constituted a significant advance in the treatment of time-series. However, as we show here, ambiguities arise in applying the BP technique with reference to the permutation of ordinal patterns. This happens if one wishes to employ the BP-probability density to construct local entropic quantifiers that would characterize time-series generated by nonlinear dynamical systems. Explicit evidence of this fact is presented by comparing two different procedures, frequently found in the literature, that generate sequences of ordinal patterns. In opposition to the case of global quantifiers in the orthodox Shannon fashion, the proper order of the pertinent symbols turns out to be not uniquely predetermined for local entropic indicators. We advance the idea of employing the FisherShannon information plane as a tool to resolve the ambiguity and give illustrative examples. © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 2012 https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_03784371_v391_n8_p2518_Olivares http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_03784371_v391_n8_p2518_Olivares
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-134
collection Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA)
topic BandtPompe probability distribution
Fisher information measure
Nonlinear time series analysis
Shannon entropy
Complexity measures
Fisher information measures
Illustrative examples
Nonlinear time series analysis
Ordinal pattern
Permutation entropy
Probability densities
Shannon entropy
Fisher information matrix
Nonlinear dynamical systems
Probability density function
Probability distributions
Time series analysis
spellingShingle BandtPompe probability distribution
Fisher information measure
Nonlinear time series analysis
Shannon entropy
Complexity measures
Fisher information measures
Illustrative examples
Nonlinear time series analysis
Ordinal pattern
Permutation entropy
Probability densities
Shannon entropy
Fisher information matrix
Nonlinear dynamical systems
Probability density function
Probability distributions
Time series analysis
Ambiguities in Bandt-Pompes methodology for local entropic quantifiers
topic_facet BandtPompe probability distribution
Fisher information measure
Nonlinear time series analysis
Shannon entropy
Complexity measures
Fisher information measures
Illustrative examples
Nonlinear time series analysis
Ordinal pattern
Permutation entropy
Probability densities
Shannon entropy
Fisher information matrix
Nonlinear dynamical systems
Probability density function
Probability distributions
Time series analysis
description The BandtPompe (BP) prescription for building up probability densities [C. Bandt, B. Pompe, Permutation entropy: a natural complexity measure for time series, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 174102] constituted a significant advance in the treatment of time-series. However, as we show here, ambiguities arise in applying the BP technique with reference to the permutation of ordinal patterns. This happens if one wishes to employ the BP-probability density to construct local entropic quantifiers that would characterize time-series generated by nonlinear dynamical systems. Explicit evidence of this fact is presented by comparing two different procedures, frequently found in the literature, that generate sequences of ordinal patterns. In opposition to the case of global quantifiers in the orthodox Shannon fashion, the proper order of the pertinent symbols turns out to be not uniquely predetermined for local entropic indicators. We advance the idea of employing the FisherShannon information plane as a tool to resolve the ambiguity and give illustrative examples. © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
title Ambiguities in Bandt-Pompes methodology for local entropic quantifiers
title_short Ambiguities in Bandt-Pompes methodology for local entropic quantifiers
title_full Ambiguities in Bandt-Pompes methodology for local entropic quantifiers
title_fullStr Ambiguities in Bandt-Pompes methodology for local entropic quantifiers
title_full_unstemmed Ambiguities in Bandt-Pompes methodology for local entropic quantifiers
title_sort ambiguities in bandt-pompes methodology for local entropic quantifiers
publishDate 2012
url https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_03784371_v391_n8_p2518_Olivares
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_03784371_v391_n8_p2518_Olivares
_version_ 1768541849648103424