Overcoming problems with the use of ratios as continuous characters for phylogenetic analyses
The use of quantitative morphometric information for phylogenetic inference has been an intensely debated topic for most of the history of phylogenetic systematics. Despite several drawbacks, the most common strategy to include this sort of data into phylogenetic studies is the use of ratios, that i...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Publicado: |
2015
|
| Acceso en línea: | https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_03003256_v44_n5_p463_MongiardinoKoch http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_03003256_v44_n5_p463_MongiardinoKoch |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
paper:paper_03003256_v44_n5_p463_MongiardinoKoch |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
paper:paper_03003256_v44_n5_p463_MongiardinoKoch2025-07-30T18:05:04Z Overcoming problems with the use of ratios as continuous characters for phylogenetic analyses Soto, Ignacio M. Ramírez, Martín Javier The use of quantitative morphometric information for phylogenetic inference has been an intensely debated topic for most of the history of phylogenetic systematics. Despite several drawbacks, the most common strategy to include this sort of data into phylogenetic studies is the use of ratios, that is quotients between morphometric variables. Here, we discuss one particular problem associated with such methodology: the fact that the often arbitrary election of which variable serves as numerator and which as denominator affects the phylogenetic outcome of the analysis. We describe the cause for such an effect, and study its implications with the use of several published data matrices. Alternative coding schemes for ratio characters result in very different phylogenetic hypotheses, an effect that may even be strong enough to affect studies that combine continuous and discrete morphological information. Some of the resulting incongruence is produced by the differences in magnitude of the continuous characters involved, although different rescaling techniques are shown to decrease, but not eliminate, the confounding effect. To eliminate such problematic effect, ratios should be either log-transformed before their use or replaced by more effective ways to capture morphometric information. © 2015 Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. Fil:Soto, I.M. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. Fil:Ramírez, M.J. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. 2015 https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_03003256_v44_n5_p463_MongiardinoKoch http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_03003256_v44_n5_p463_MongiardinoKoch |
| institution |
Universidad de Buenos Aires |
| institution_str |
I-28 |
| repository_str |
R-134 |
| collection |
Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA) |
| description |
The use of quantitative morphometric information for phylogenetic inference has been an intensely debated topic for most of the history of phylogenetic systematics. Despite several drawbacks, the most common strategy to include this sort of data into phylogenetic studies is the use of ratios, that is quotients between morphometric variables. Here, we discuss one particular problem associated with such methodology: the fact that the often arbitrary election of which variable serves as numerator and which as denominator affects the phylogenetic outcome of the analysis. We describe the cause for such an effect, and study its implications with the use of several published data matrices. Alternative coding schemes for ratio characters result in very different phylogenetic hypotheses, an effect that may even be strong enough to affect studies that combine continuous and discrete morphological information. Some of the resulting incongruence is produced by the differences in magnitude of the continuous characters involved, although different rescaling techniques are shown to decrease, but not eliminate, the confounding effect. To eliminate such problematic effect, ratios should be either log-transformed before their use or replaced by more effective ways to capture morphometric information. © 2015 Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. |
| author |
Soto, Ignacio M. Ramírez, Martín Javier |
| spellingShingle |
Soto, Ignacio M. Ramírez, Martín Javier Overcoming problems with the use of ratios as continuous characters for phylogenetic analyses |
| author_facet |
Soto, Ignacio M. Ramírez, Martín Javier |
| author_sort |
Soto, Ignacio M. |
| title |
Overcoming problems with the use of ratios as continuous characters for phylogenetic analyses |
| title_short |
Overcoming problems with the use of ratios as continuous characters for phylogenetic analyses |
| title_full |
Overcoming problems with the use of ratios as continuous characters for phylogenetic analyses |
| title_fullStr |
Overcoming problems with the use of ratios as continuous characters for phylogenetic analyses |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Overcoming problems with the use of ratios as continuous characters for phylogenetic analyses |
| title_sort |
overcoming problems with the use of ratios as continuous characters for phylogenetic analyses |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| url |
https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_03003256_v44_n5_p463_MongiardinoKoch http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_03003256_v44_n5_p463_MongiardinoKoch |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT sotoignaciom overcomingproblemswiththeuseofratiosascontinuouscharactersforphylogeneticanalyses AT ramirezmartinjavier overcomingproblemswiththeuseofratiosascontinuouscharactersforphylogeneticanalyses |
| _version_ |
1840325615676293120 |