Assessing environmental health using ecological indices for soft bottom in sewage-affected rocky shores: The case of the largest seaside resort of SW Atlantic

Efficient ecological indices can reflect the differences between impacted and nonimpacted sites, leading to significant variations at the contamination spatial scale. Here, we evaluated the spatial-temporal variability of 3 ecological indices (AMBI, M-AMBI, and BENTIX) in response to the distinct le...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado: 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_0025326X_v_n_p_Garaffo
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_0025326X_v_n_p_Garaffo
Aporte de:
id paper:paper_0025326X_v_n_p_Garaffo
record_format dspace
spelling paper:paper_0025326X_v_n_p_Garaffo2023-06-08T14:53:07Z Assessing environmental health using ecological indices for soft bottom in sewage-affected rocky shores: The case of the largest seaside resort of SW Atlantic AMBI BENTIX M-AMBI Urban effluents sewage animal Atlantic Ocean ecology ecosystem environmental health environmental monitoring invertebrate sewage Animals Atlantic Ocean Ecology Ecosystem Environmental Health Environmental Monitoring Invertebrates Sewage Efficient ecological indices can reflect the differences between impacted and nonimpacted sites, leading to significant variations at the contamination spatial scale. Here, we evaluated the spatial-temporal variability of 3 ecological indices (AMBI, M-AMBI, and BENTIX) in response to the distinct levels of sewage contamination. The indices were evaluated in two different ways: including . Brachidontes rodriguezii (IBR) and excluding . B. . rodriguezii (EBR). The fact that mussel beds create a secondary infaunal habitat allows us to test these indices for soft bottoms in areas with rocky bottoms. The effectiveness and the level of agreement of these indices were increased when they were calculated with EBR. BENTIX and M-AMBI produced under- and overestimations of the ecological status of the studied sites. AMBI (EBR) seems to be better suited for environmental quality assessment in the study area. This index reduces the processing time of samples; thus, the AMBI (EBR) index could be used as a robust management tool for monitoring programs in areas with hard substrate. © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. 2016 https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_0025326X_v_n_p_Garaffo http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_0025326X_v_n_p_Garaffo
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-134
collection Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA)
topic AMBI
BENTIX
M-AMBI
Urban effluents
sewage
animal
Atlantic Ocean
ecology
ecosystem
environmental health
environmental monitoring
invertebrate
sewage
Animals
Atlantic Ocean
Ecology
Ecosystem
Environmental Health
Environmental Monitoring
Invertebrates
Sewage
spellingShingle AMBI
BENTIX
M-AMBI
Urban effluents
sewage
animal
Atlantic Ocean
ecology
ecosystem
environmental health
environmental monitoring
invertebrate
sewage
Animals
Atlantic Ocean
Ecology
Ecosystem
Environmental Health
Environmental Monitoring
Invertebrates
Sewage
Assessing environmental health using ecological indices for soft bottom in sewage-affected rocky shores: The case of the largest seaside resort of SW Atlantic
topic_facet AMBI
BENTIX
M-AMBI
Urban effluents
sewage
animal
Atlantic Ocean
ecology
ecosystem
environmental health
environmental monitoring
invertebrate
sewage
Animals
Atlantic Ocean
Ecology
Ecosystem
Environmental Health
Environmental Monitoring
Invertebrates
Sewage
description Efficient ecological indices can reflect the differences between impacted and nonimpacted sites, leading to significant variations at the contamination spatial scale. Here, we evaluated the spatial-temporal variability of 3 ecological indices (AMBI, M-AMBI, and BENTIX) in response to the distinct levels of sewage contamination. The indices were evaluated in two different ways: including . Brachidontes rodriguezii (IBR) and excluding . B. . rodriguezii (EBR). The fact that mussel beds create a secondary infaunal habitat allows us to test these indices for soft bottoms in areas with rocky bottoms. The effectiveness and the level of agreement of these indices were increased when they were calculated with EBR. BENTIX and M-AMBI produced under- and overestimations of the ecological status of the studied sites. AMBI (EBR) seems to be better suited for environmental quality assessment in the study area. This index reduces the processing time of samples; thus, the AMBI (EBR) index could be used as a robust management tool for monitoring programs in areas with hard substrate. © 2016 Elsevier Ltd.
title Assessing environmental health using ecological indices for soft bottom in sewage-affected rocky shores: The case of the largest seaside resort of SW Atlantic
title_short Assessing environmental health using ecological indices for soft bottom in sewage-affected rocky shores: The case of the largest seaside resort of SW Atlantic
title_full Assessing environmental health using ecological indices for soft bottom in sewage-affected rocky shores: The case of the largest seaside resort of SW Atlantic
title_fullStr Assessing environmental health using ecological indices for soft bottom in sewage-affected rocky shores: The case of the largest seaside resort of SW Atlantic
title_full_unstemmed Assessing environmental health using ecological indices for soft bottom in sewage-affected rocky shores: The case of the largest seaside resort of SW Atlantic
title_sort assessing environmental health using ecological indices for soft bottom in sewage-affected rocky shores: the case of the largest seaside resort of sw atlantic
publishDate 2016
url https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_0025326X_v_n_p_Garaffo
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_0025326X_v_n_p_Garaffo
_version_ 1768544354176073728