Independence friendly logic with classical negation via flattening is a second-order logic with weak dependencies
It is well-known that Independence Friendly (IF) logic is equivalent to existential second-order logic (Σ11) and, therefore, is not closed under classical negation. The Boolean closure of IF sentences, called Extended IF-logic, on the other hand, corresponds to a proper fragment of Δ21. In this arti...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Publicado: |
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_00220000_v80_n6_p1102_Figueira http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00220000_v80_n6_p1102_Figueira |
Aporte de: |
id |
paper:paper_00220000_v80_n6_p1102_Figueira |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
paper:paper_00220000_v80_n6_p1102_Figueira2023-06-08T14:45:03Z Independence friendly logic with classical negation via flattening is a second-order logic with weak dependencies Figueira, Santiago Daniel Gorín, Daniel Alejandro Expressive power Flattening operator Imperfect information logic Independence friendly logic Second order logic Computer networks Systems science Expressive power Flattening operator Imperfect information Independence friendly logic Second-order logic Formal logic It is well-known that Independence Friendly (IF) logic is equivalent to existential second-order logic (Σ11) and, therefore, is not closed under classical negation. The Boolean closure of IF sentences, called Extended IF-logic, on the other hand, corresponds to a proper fragment of Δ21. In this article we consider SL(↓), IF-logic extended with Hodges' flattening operator ↓, which allows to define a classical negation. SL(↓) contains Extended IF-logic and hence it is at least as expressive as the Boolean closure of Σ11. We prove that SL(↓) corresponds to a weak syntactic fragment of SO which we show to be strictly contained in Δ21. The separation is derived almost trivially from the fact that Σn1 defines its own truth-predicate. We finally show that SL(↓) is equivalent to the logic of Henkin quantifiers, which shows, we argue, that Hodges' notion of negation is adequate. © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Fil:Figueira, S. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. Fil:Gorín, D. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. 2014 https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_00220000_v80_n6_p1102_Figueira http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00220000_v80_n6_p1102_Figueira |
institution |
Universidad de Buenos Aires |
institution_str |
I-28 |
repository_str |
R-134 |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA) |
topic |
Expressive power Flattening operator Imperfect information logic Independence friendly logic Second order logic Computer networks Systems science Expressive power Flattening operator Imperfect information Independence friendly logic Second-order logic Formal logic |
spellingShingle |
Expressive power Flattening operator Imperfect information logic Independence friendly logic Second order logic Computer networks Systems science Expressive power Flattening operator Imperfect information Independence friendly logic Second-order logic Formal logic Figueira, Santiago Daniel Gorín, Daniel Alejandro Independence friendly logic with classical negation via flattening is a second-order logic with weak dependencies |
topic_facet |
Expressive power Flattening operator Imperfect information logic Independence friendly logic Second order logic Computer networks Systems science Expressive power Flattening operator Imperfect information Independence friendly logic Second-order logic Formal logic |
description |
It is well-known that Independence Friendly (IF) logic is equivalent to existential second-order logic (Σ11) and, therefore, is not closed under classical negation. The Boolean closure of IF sentences, called Extended IF-logic, on the other hand, corresponds to a proper fragment of Δ21. In this article we consider SL(↓), IF-logic extended with Hodges' flattening operator ↓, which allows to define a classical negation. SL(↓) contains Extended IF-logic and hence it is at least as expressive as the Boolean closure of Σ11. We prove that SL(↓) corresponds to a weak syntactic fragment of SO which we show to be strictly contained in Δ21. The separation is derived almost trivially from the fact that Σn1 defines its own truth-predicate. We finally show that SL(↓) is equivalent to the logic of Henkin quantifiers, which shows, we argue, that Hodges' notion of negation is adequate. © 2014 Elsevier Inc. |
author |
Figueira, Santiago Daniel Gorín, Daniel Alejandro |
author_facet |
Figueira, Santiago Daniel Gorín, Daniel Alejandro |
author_sort |
Figueira, Santiago Daniel |
title |
Independence friendly logic with classical negation via flattening is a second-order logic with weak dependencies |
title_short |
Independence friendly logic with classical negation via flattening is a second-order logic with weak dependencies |
title_full |
Independence friendly logic with classical negation via flattening is a second-order logic with weak dependencies |
title_fullStr |
Independence friendly logic with classical negation via flattening is a second-order logic with weak dependencies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Independence friendly logic with classical negation via flattening is a second-order logic with weak dependencies |
title_sort |
independence friendly logic with classical negation via flattening is a second-order logic with weak dependencies |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_00220000_v80_n6_p1102_Figueira http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00220000_v80_n6_p1102_Figueira |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT figueirasantiagodaniel independencefriendlylogicwithclassicalnegationviaflatteningisasecondorderlogicwithweakdependencies AT gorindanielalejandro independencefriendlylogicwithclassicalnegationviaflatteningisasecondorderlogicwithweakdependencies |
_version_ |
1768543880597209088 |