How long should a system be observed to obtain reliable concentration estimates from the measurement of fluctuations?

The interior of cells is a highly fluctuating environment. Fluctuations set limits to the accuracy with which endogenous processes can occur. The physical principles that rule these limits also affect the experimental quantification of biophysical parameters in situ. The characterization of fluctuat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado: 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_00063495_v107_n11_p2674_Ipina
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00063495_v107_n11_p2674_Ipina
Aporte de:
id paper:paper_00063495_v107_n11_p2674_Ipina
record_format dspace
spelling paper:paper_00063495_v107_n11_p2674_Ipina2023-06-08T14:31:14Z How long should a system be observed to obtain reliable concentration estimates from the measurement of fluctuations? binding site biophysics cells computer simulation diffusion mathematical computing metabolism spectrofluorometry statistics Binding Sites Biophysical Phenomena Cells Computer Simulation Diffusion Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted Spectrometry, Fluorescence Stochastic Processes The interior of cells is a highly fluctuating environment. Fluctuations set limits to the accuracy with which endogenous processes can occur. The physical principles that rule these limits also affect the experimental quantification of biophysical parameters in situ. The characterization of fluctuations, on the other hand, provides a way to quantify biophysical parameters. But as with any random process, enough data has to be collected to achieve a reliable quantitative description. In this article we study the accuracy with which intracellular concentrations can be estimated using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. We show that, when the observed molecules interact with immobile species or experience other restrictions to their movement, the hypotheses commonly used to estimate concentrations are no longer valid. The interactions with immobile sites reduce the fluorescence variance by a finite amount. The time that is necessary to obtain an accurate concentration estimate, on the other hand, is hundreds of times larger than the slowest correlation time and is much larger when the sites move slowly than when they are immobile. Our analysis is applicable to other related techniques and it also sheds light on the way in which effector concentrations are read by target molecules in cells. © 2014 Biophysical Society. 2014 https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_00063495_v107_n11_p2674_Ipina http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00063495_v107_n11_p2674_Ipina
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-134
collection Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA)
topic binding site
biophysics
cells
computer simulation
diffusion
mathematical computing
metabolism
spectrofluorometry
statistics
Binding Sites
Biophysical Phenomena
Cells
Computer Simulation
Diffusion
Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted
Spectrometry, Fluorescence
Stochastic Processes
spellingShingle binding site
biophysics
cells
computer simulation
diffusion
mathematical computing
metabolism
spectrofluorometry
statistics
Binding Sites
Biophysical Phenomena
Cells
Computer Simulation
Diffusion
Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted
Spectrometry, Fluorescence
Stochastic Processes
How long should a system be observed to obtain reliable concentration estimates from the measurement of fluctuations?
topic_facet binding site
biophysics
cells
computer simulation
diffusion
mathematical computing
metabolism
spectrofluorometry
statistics
Binding Sites
Biophysical Phenomena
Cells
Computer Simulation
Diffusion
Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted
Spectrometry, Fluorescence
Stochastic Processes
description The interior of cells is a highly fluctuating environment. Fluctuations set limits to the accuracy with which endogenous processes can occur. The physical principles that rule these limits also affect the experimental quantification of biophysical parameters in situ. The characterization of fluctuations, on the other hand, provides a way to quantify biophysical parameters. But as with any random process, enough data has to be collected to achieve a reliable quantitative description. In this article we study the accuracy with which intracellular concentrations can be estimated using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. We show that, when the observed molecules interact with immobile species or experience other restrictions to their movement, the hypotheses commonly used to estimate concentrations are no longer valid. The interactions with immobile sites reduce the fluorescence variance by a finite amount. The time that is necessary to obtain an accurate concentration estimate, on the other hand, is hundreds of times larger than the slowest correlation time and is much larger when the sites move slowly than when they are immobile. Our analysis is applicable to other related techniques and it also sheds light on the way in which effector concentrations are read by target molecules in cells. © 2014 Biophysical Society.
title How long should a system be observed to obtain reliable concentration estimates from the measurement of fluctuations?
title_short How long should a system be observed to obtain reliable concentration estimates from the measurement of fluctuations?
title_full How long should a system be observed to obtain reliable concentration estimates from the measurement of fluctuations?
title_fullStr How long should a system be observed to obtain reliable concentration estimates from the measurement of fluctuations?
title_full_unstemmed How long should a system be observed to obtain reliable concentration estimates from the measurement of fluctuations?
title_sort how long should a system be observed to obtain reliable concentration estimates from the measurement of fluctuations?
publishDate 2014
url https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_00063495_v107_n11_p2674_Ipina
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00063495_v107_n11_p2674_Ipina
_version_ 1768544893040328704