Abrir(nos) un camino entre las ruinas : la negatividad en cuestión

If there was an element that showed the emergency of the dialectical thinking was, without any doubt, the agonal spirit, the discord, the disagreement, either dialogos that they tried to refuse the argument of the opponent (zenonian subjetive dialectics from the thought), or the contradictory/negati...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Véliz, Claudio
Formato: Artículo publishedVersion
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://rdd.undav.edu.ar/pdfs/pr56/pr56.pdf
Aporte de:
id I67-R173-pr56
record_format dspace
institution Universidad Nacional de Avellaneda (UNDAV)
institution_str I-67
repository_str R-173
collection RDD - Repositorio Documental y de Datos de la Universidad de Avellaneda (UNDAV)
language Español
orig_language_str_mv spa
topic Critique
Tragedy
Dialectic
Deconstruction
Agonal spirit
Difference
Negativity
Crítica
Tragédia
Dialética
Desconstrução
Genealogia
Diferença
Negatividade
Crítica
Tragedia
Dialéctica
Deconstrucción
Agonismo
Diferencia
Negatividad
spellingShingle Critique
Tragedy
Dialectic
Deconstruction
Agonal spirit
Difference
Negativity
Crítica
Tragédia
Dialética
Desconstrução
Genealogia
Diferença
Negatividade
Crítica
Tragedia
Dialéctica
Deconstrucción
Agonismo
Diferencia
Negatividad
Véliz, Claudio
Abrir(nos) un camino entre las ruinas : la negatividad en cuestión
topic_facet Critique
Tragedy
Dialectic
Deconstruction
Agonal spirit
Difference
Negativity
Crítica
Tragédia
Dialética
Desconstrução
Genealogia
Diferença
Negatividade
Crítica
Tragedia
Dialéctica
Deconstrucción
Agonismo
Diferencia
Negatividad
description If there was an element that showed the emergency of the dialectical thinking was, without any doubt, the agonal spirit, the discord, the disagreement, either dialogos that they tried to refuse the argument of the opponent (zenonian subjetive dialectics from the thought), or the contradictory/negative movement of the real (heraclitean dialectics objetive of the things). According to the hegelian phenomenology, this repetition process became into a movement of upper synthesis; then the marxianian inversion invited us to read the dialectics as a social confrontation. By different ways, “the last” Sartre and the Frankfurt’s critical theory have contributed to problematice, to complejize, to critize the hegelian-marxianian heritage from the dialectics thought. Meanwhile, the derridian deconstruction purposed a displacement insignificant and radical opening a productive discussion with those dialectical drifts. In all the cases, it was pondered the density negative, agonal, tensional including tragical inhering to the relation moods with the other and with the others at the same time that the unconditional opening to the redeemers spectros of the justice, hospitality, the mimetic connection or by démocratie à venir. In the antipode of one negativity understood as requirement of the damaged life, the affirmative neonietzscheanism got distance from all dialectic up to get lost in nomadism without ending. We will try to get a position according to these crosses and of this antidialectical dispute.
format Artículo
Artículo
publishedVersion
author Véliz, Claudio
author_facet Véliz, Claudio
author_sort Véliz, Claudio
title Abrir(nos) un camino entre las ruinas : la negatividad en cuestión
title_short Abrir(nos) un camino entre las ruinas : la negatividad en cuestión
title_full Abrir(nos) un camino entre las ruinas : la negatividad en cuestión
title_fullStr Abrir(nos) un camino entre las ruinas : la negatividad en cuestión
title_full_unstemmed Abrir(nos) un camino entre las ruinas : la negatividad en cuestión
title_sort abrir(nos) un camino entre las ruinas : la negatividad en cuestión
publishDate 2015
url http://rdd.undav.edu.ar/pdfs/pr56/pr56.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT velizclaudio abrirnosuncaminoentrelasruinaslanegatividadencuestion
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820551173406721