Representation and Delegation in Trade Policymaking: The Political Economy of Trade Taxes in Argentina
The literature typically argues that legislative influence on trade policy is scant and reactive because trade policymaking power is largely delegated to the executive. Bridging the literatures on political economy and legislative politics, we analyze legislative activity on trade taxes in a sett...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Studies in Comparative International Development (e-ISSN: 1936-6167)
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://repositorio.utdt.edu/handle/20.500.13098/13143 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-024-09448- w |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I57-R163-20.500.13098-13143 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
I57-R163-20.500.13098-131432024-11-09T07:00:10Z Representation and Delegation in Trade Policymaking: The Political Economy of Trade Taxes in Argentina Bonvecchi, Alejandro Clerici, Paula Trade taxes Impuestos al comercio Federalism Federalismo Legislative politics Legislator's behavior The literature typically argues that legislative influence on trade policy is scant and reactive because trade policymaking power is largely delegated to the executive. Bridging the literatures on political economy and legislative politics, we analyze legislative activity on trade taxes in a setting in which delegated powers reverted to the legislature after decades under executive jurisdiction: the Argentine Chamber of Deputies. Our findings reveal that delegation is the prevailing strategy, legislators intervene prompted by economic shocks, and the contents of their initiatives are contingent to the effects of shocks on local economies. When appreciation rages or devaluation is insufficient, legislators representing export-oriented economies submit liberalizing bills, and those representing inward-oriented economies submit protectionist initiatives. Otherwise, delegation remains the norm and legislators strategically employ declarative bills to signal their preferred policies. Por motivos relacionados con los derechos de autor este documento solo puede ser consultado en la Biblioteca Di Tella. Para reservar una cita podés ponerte en contacto con repositorio@utdt.edu. Este artículo se encuentra originalmente publicado en Studies in Comparative International Development (e-ISSN: 1936-6167) 2024-11-08T22:01:56Z 2024-11-08T22:01:56Z 2024-11-06 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion https://repositorio.utdt.edu/handle/20.500.13098/13143 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-024-09448- w eng Studies in Comparative International Development (e-ISSN: 1936-6167) info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=es 27 p. application/pdf application/pdf Studies in Comparative International Development (e-ISSN: 1936-6167) |
| institution |
Universidad Torcuato Di Tella |
| institution_str |
I-57 |
| repository_str |
R-163 |
| collection |
Repositorio Digital Universidad Torcuato Di Tella |
| language |
Inglés |
| orig_language_str_mv |
eng |
| topic |
Trade taxes Impuestos al comercio Federalism Federalismo Legislative politics Legislator's behavior |
| spellingShingle |
Trade taxes Impuestos al comercio Federalism Federalismo Legislative politics Legislator's behavior Bonvecchi, Alejandro Clerici, Paula Representation and Delegation in Trade Policymaking: The Political Economy of Trade Taxes in Argentina |
| topic_facet |
Trade taxes Impuestos al comercio Federalism Federalismo Legislative politics Legislator's behavior |
| description |
The literature typically argues that legislative influence on trade policy is scant and
reactive because trade policymaking power is largely delegated to the executive.
Bridging the literatures on political economy and legislative politics, we analyze
legislative activity on trade taxes in a setting in which delegated powers reverted to
the legislature after decades under executive jurisdiction: the Argentine Chamber
of Deputies. Our findings reveal that delegation is the prevailing strategy, legislators
intervene prompted by economic shocks, and the contents of their initiatives
are contingent to the effects of shocks on local economies. When appreciation rages
or devaluation is insufficient, legislators representing export-oriented economies
submit liberalizing bills, and those representing inward-oriented economies submit
protectionist initiatives. Otherwise, delegation remains the norm and legislators strategically
employ declarative bills to signal their preferred policies. |
| format |
Artículo publishedVersion |
| author |
Bonvecchi, Alejandro Clerici, Paula |
| author_facet |
Bonvecchi, Alejandro Clerici, Paula |
| author_sort |
Bonvecchi, Alejandro |
| title |
Representation and Delegation in Trade Policymaking: The Political Economy of Trade Taxes in Argentina |
| title_short |
Representation and Delegation in Trade Policymaking: The Political Economy of Trade Taxes in Argentina |
| title_full |
Representation and Delegation in Trade Policymaking: The Political Economy of Trade Taxes in Argentina |
| title_fullStr |
Representation and Delegation in Trade Policymaking: The Political Economy of Trade Taxes in Argentina |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Representation and Delegation in Trade Policymaking: The Political Economy of Trade Taxes in Argentina |
| title_sort |
representation and delegation in trade policymaking: the political economy of trade taxes in argentina |
| publisher |
Studies in Comparative International Development (e-ISSN: 1936-6167) |
| publishDate |
2024 |
| url |
https://repositorio.utdt.edu/handle/20.500.13098/13143 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-024-09448- w |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT bonvecchialejandro representationanddelegationintradepolicymakingthepoliticaleconomyoftradetaxesinargentina AT clericipaula representationanddelegationintradepolicymakingthepoliticaleconomyoftradetaxesinargentina |
| _version_ |
1823894525063462912 |