Eficiencia de las unidades de conservación definidas en la Reserva Natural Iberá, Argentina en la protección de la diversidad de reptiles

Effi ciency of conservation units defi ned in Iberá Natural Reserve (Argentina) in protecting reptile’s diversity. Owing to accelerated biodiversity loss caused by human activities, the protected areas (PAs) are the main response to mitigate this crisis. The Iberá Natural Reserve (INR) includes 13...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Etchepare, Eduardo Gabriel, Giraudo, Alejandro Raúl, Arzamendia, Vanesa, Bellini, Gisela Paola, Álvarez, Blanca Beatriz
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Fundação Zoobotânica do Rio Grande do Sul. Museu de Ciências Naturais 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://repositorio.unne.edu.ar/handle/123456789/30762
Aporte de:
Descripción
Sumario:Effi ciency of conservation units defi ned in Iberá Natural Reserve (Argentina) in protecting reptile’s diversity. Owing to accelerated biodiversity loss caused by human activities, the protected areas (PAs) are the main response to mitigate this crisis. The Iberá Natural Reserve (INR) includes 13000 km2 of private and state lands, which contain wetland and upland areas with high biodiversity, endemism and signifi cant populations of threatened species. In order to implement its conservation, late last century, fi ve Units of Conservation (UC) were defi ned and prioritized due to infrastructure and park-rangers, although poorly selected by explicit criteria. We defi ned priority areas for conservation (APCs) using the distribution patterns of reptiles in the INR, in order to evaluate the effi ciency of the fi ve UC located within its boundaries and detect other possible areas to be considered in conservation eff orts. The INR was divided into 28 quadrat-cells of 0.25° latitude-longitude and through fi eld samplings and revision of collections we obtained 1482 records of 71 species of reptiles, computed their presence / absence in the cells. We estimated species richness and Combined Biodiversity Index (including rarity and degree of threat) by cell. APCs were defi ned by an exact search (complementarity index), obtaining the minimum set of areas containing higher values of the indexes used, which is called “maximum effi ciency”. The minimum area required to represent all species was ten cells (36%) and only two of them includes current UC. Add eight cells are needed to fi ll conservation gaps of reptiles, particularly in the north of the INR. About 20 threatened or poorly known species, 12 (60%) were not recorded in cells with UC. We proposed additional UC in order to protect all reptiles and include threatened species.