Artificial intelligence, knowledge-power and subjectivity

The article proposes reflecting on the impact that artificial intelligence technologies have on the configuration of contemporary subjectivities. It seeks to investigate the extent to which artificial intelligence devices, increasingly present in everyday life, establish patterns of operation to dis...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Marcos, Dolores
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Instituto de Filosofía - Facultad de Humanidades. UNNE 2025
Materias:
subjectivity
existence
philosophical criticism
knowledge-power
artificial intelligence
subjetividad
existencia
crítica filosófica
saber-poder
inteligencia artificial
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unne.edu.ar/index.php/nit/article/view/8852
Aporte de:
Revistas UNNE - Universidad Nacional del Noroeste (UNNE) de Universidad Nacional del Nordeste
id I48-R154-article-8852
record_format ojs
spelling I48-R154-article-88522025-11-26T16:20:57Z Artificial intelligence, knowledge-power and subjectivity Inteligencia artificial, saber-poder y subjetividad Marcos, Dolores subjectivity existence philosophical criticism knowledge-power artificial intelligence subjetividad existencia crítica filosófica saber-poder inteligencia artificial The article proposes reflecting on the impact that artificial intelligence technologies have on the configuration of contemporary subjectivities. It seeks to investigate the extent to which artificial intelligence devices, increasingly present in everyday life, establish patterns of operation to discipline subjects according to criteria of efficiency. The promise of a flawless world, promoted by the algorithmic management of various areas of life, has the effect of undermining what constitutes a truly human existence in favor of mere functioning, leading to a loss of autonomy and a blurring of spaces for debate about the common good. To address this issue, we start from Foucault's conception of how power-knowledge relations shape subjects. Secondly, based on the analyses of Eric Sadin and Miguel Benasayag, we will examine the normative nature of artificial intelligence in its ability to establish correct behavior with a view to creating a flawless, efficient, optimally functioning world. Next, we explore the decline of politics and the capacity for judgment in the tendency to replace debate and conflict with algorithmic management of public affairs. Finally, in the face of this colonization of life, the article recovers philosophical criticism as a tool for resistance and the construction of spaces for emancipation. El artículo propone reflexionar acerca del impacto que las tecnologías de inteligencia artificial tienen en la configuración de subjetividades contemporáneas. Se trata de indagar en qué medida los dispositivos de inteligencia artificial, cada vez más presentes en la vida cotidiana, establecen patrones de funcionamiento para disciplinar a los sujetos en función de criterios de eficiencia. La promesa de un mundo sin fallas, que promueve la gestión algorítmica de los diversos espacios de la vida, tiene como efecto hacer retroceder aquello que configura una existencia propiamente humana a favor del mero funcionamiento, lo cual conlleva pérdida de autonomía y desdibujamiento de espacios de debate acerca de lo común. Para abordar esta cuestión se parte de la concepción foucaulteana acerca del modo en que las relaciones de poder-saber configuran a los sujetos. En segundo lugar, y en base a los análisis de Eric Sadin, y de Miguel Benasayag, se dará cuenta del carácter normativo de la inteligencia artificial en la capacidad de establecer la corrección de las conductas con vistas a configurar un mundo sin fallas, eficiente, de óptimo funcionamiento. Seguidamente, se explora el retroceso de lo político y de la capacidad de juicio, en la tendencia a reemplazar el debate y el conflicto por una gestión algorítmica de la administración de los asuntos públicos. Finalmente, frente a esta colonización de la vida, el artículo recupera la crítica filosófica –como herramienta de resistencia y de construcción de espacios de emancipación. Instituto de Filosofía - Facultad de Humanidades. UNNE 2025-11-19 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo revisado por pares application/pdf https://revistas.unne.edu.ar/index.php/nit/article/view/8852 10.30972/nvt.2128852 New Itinerary; Vol. 21 No. 2 (2025); 1-14 Nuevo Itinerario; Vol. 21 Núm. 2 (2025); 1-14 Novo itinerário; v. 21 n. 2 (2025); 1-14 1850-3578 spa https://revistas.unne.edu.ar/index.php/nit/article/view/8852/8527 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
institution Universidad Nacional del Nordeste
institution_str I-48
repository_str R-154
container_title_str Revistas UNNE - Universidad Nacional del Noroeste (UNNE)
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic subjectivity
existence
philosophical criticism
knowledge-power
artificial intelligence
subjetividad
existencia
crítica filosófica
saber-poder
inteligencia artificial
spellingShingle subjectivity
existence
philosophical criticism
knowledge-power
artificial intelligence
subjetividad
existencia
crítica filosófica
saber-poder
inteligencia artificial
Marcos, Dolores
Artificial intelligence, knowledge-power and subjectivity
topic_facet subjectivity
existence
philosophical criticism
knowledge-power
artificial intelligence
subjetividad
existencia
crítica filosófica
saber-poder
inteligencia artificial
author Marcos, Dolores
author_facet Marcos, Dolores
author_sort Marcos, Dolores
title Artificial intelligence, knowledge-power and subjectivity
title_short Artificial intelligence, knowledge-power and subjectivity
title_full Artificial intelligence, knowledge-power and subjectivity
title_fullStr Artificial intelligence, knowledge-power and subjectivity
title_full_unstemmed Artificial intelligence, knowledge-power and subjectivity
title_sort artificial intelligence, knowledge-power and subjectivity
description The article proposes reflecting on the impact that artificial intelligence technologies have on the configuration of contemporary subjectivities. It seeks to investigate the extent to which artificial intelligence devices, increasingly present in everyday life, establish patterns of operation to discipline subjects according to criteria of efficiency. The promise of a flawless world, promoted by the algorithmic management of various areas of life, has the effect of undermining what constitutes a truly human existence in favor of mere functioning, leading to a loss of autonomy and a blurring of spaces for debate about the common good. To address this issue, we start from Foucault's conception of how power-knowledge relations shape subjects. Secondly, based on the analyses of Eric Sadin and Miguel Benasayag, we will examine the normative nature of artificial intelligence in its ability to establish correct behavior with a view to creating a flawless, efficient, optimally functioning world. Next, we explore the decline of politics and the capacity for judgment in the tendency to replace debate and conflict with algorithmic management of public affairs. Finally, in the face of this colonization of life, the article recovers philosophical criticism as a tool for resistance and the construction of spaces for emancipation.
publisher Instituto de Filosofía - Facultad de Humanidades. UNNE
publishDate 2025
url https://revistas.unne.edu.ar/index.php/nit/article/view/8852
work_keys_str_mv AT marcosdolores artificialintelligenceknowledgepowerandsubjectivity
AT marcosdolores inteligenciaartificialsaberpoderysubjetividad
first_indexed 2025-12-17T05:00:24Z
last_indexed 2025-12-17T05:00:24Z
_version_ 1851730295936516096

Ejemplares similares