Buying stones: welfare spending and protests in Argentina, 2008–2019

Mostrar todas las versiones(2)

Why do some governments manage to curb protest while others cannot and turmoil escalates to a social outbreak? This study proposes a theoretical argument that specifies how discretionary spending reduces conflict, highlighting the role of social movements in managing protests. It examines this and a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Del Tredici, Romina, González, Lucas, Zarazaga, Rodrigo
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc 2022
Materias:
HT Comunidades. Clases. Razas
HV Patología social. Social y el bienestar público
Acceso en línea:http://pa.bibdigital.ucc.edu.ar/3380/1/A_Del%20Tredici_Gonzalez_Zarazaga.pdf
Aporte de:
Producción Académica Universidad Católica de Córdoba (UCCor) de Universidad Católica de Córdoba
id I38-R144-3380
record_format dspace
spelling I38-R144-33802025-04-09T21:22:35Z http://pa.bibdigital.ucc.edu.ar/3380/ Buying stones: welfare spending and protests in Argentina, 2008–2019 Del Tredici, Romina González, Lucas Zarazaga, Rodrigo HT Comunidades. Clases. Razas HV Patología social. Social y el bienestar público Why do some governments manage to curb protest while others cannot and turmoil escalates to a social outbreak? This study proposes a theoretical argument that specifies how discretionary spending reduces conflict, highlighting the role of social movements in managing protests. It examines this and alternative arguments in Argentina, a country with strong social movements and historically large mobilizations, using statistical analysis with an original database on protests and a population of 364 national government programs between 2008 and 2019. The article makes a contribution by finding a differential effect between specific types of social spending, programmatic and discretional, and protests. It also specifies the linkage between the main variables using qualitative evidence during two presidencies. The goal of discretionary distribution is not to win an election but to ensure governance. The article finally raises some comparative implications on the role of social movements and welfare spending in Latin America. John Wiley and Sons Inc 2022-08-29 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess application/pdf spa http://pa.bibdigital.ucc.edu.ar/3380/1/A_Del%20Tredici_Gonzalez_Zarazaga.pdf Del Tredici, Romina ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5063-6109 <https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5063-6109>, González, Lucas and Zarazaga, Rodrigo (2022) Buying stones: welfare spending and protests in Argentina, 2008–2019. Governance. ISSN 0952-1895 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gove.12728 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12728
institution Universidad Católica de Córdoba
institution_str I-38
repository_str R-144
collection Producción Académica Universidad Católica de Córdoba (UCCor)
language Español
orig_language_str_mv spa
topic HT Comunidades. Clases. Razas
HV Patología social. Social y el bienestar público
spellingShingle HT Comunidades. Clases. Razas
HV Patología social. Social y el bienestar público
Del Tredici, Romina
González, Lucas
Zarazaga, Rodrigo
Buying stones: welfare spending and protests in Argentina, 2008–2019
topic_facet HT Comunidades. Clases. Razas
HV Patología social. Social y el bienestar público
description Why do some governments manage to curb protest while others cannot and turmoil escalates to a social outbreak? This study proposes a theoretical argument that specifies how discretionary spending reduces conflict, highlighting the role of social movements in managing protests. It examines this and alternative arguments in Argentina, a country with strong social movements and historically large mobilizations, using statistical analysis with an original database on protests and a population of 364 national government programs between 2008 and 2019. The article makes a contribution by finding a differential effect between specific types of social spending, programmatic and discretional, and protests. It also specifies the linkage between the main variables using qualitative evidence during two presidencies. The goal of discretionary distribution is not to win an election but to ensure governance. The article finally raises some comparative implications on the role of social movements and welfare spending in Latin America.
format Artículo
author Del Tredici, Romina
González, Lucas
Zarazaga, Rodrigo
author_facet Del Tredici, Romina
González, Lucas
Zarazaga, Rodrigo
author_sort Del Tredici, Romina
title Buying stones: welfare spending and protests in Argentina, 2008–2019
title_short Buying stones: welfare spending and protests in Argentina, 2008–2019
title_full Buying stones: welfare spending and protests in Argentina, 2008–2019
title_fullStr Buying stones: welfare spending and protests in Argentina, 2008–2019
title_full_unstemmed Buying stones: welfare spending and protests in Argentina, 2008–2019
title_sort buying stones: welfare spending and protests in argentina, 2008–2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc
publishDate 2022
url http://pa.bibdigital.ucc.edu.ar/3380/1/A_Del%20Tredici_Gonzalez_Zarazaga.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT deltrediciromina buyingstoneswelfarespendingandprotestsinargentina20082019
AT gonzalezlucas buyingstoneswelfarespendingandprotestsinargentina20082019
AT zarazagarodrigo buyingstoneswelfarespendingandprotestsinargentina20082019
_version_ 1832592345680314368

Ejemplares similares