Hannibal ante portas : ¿por qué desistió Aníbal de capturar Roma en el 216 a.C.?

Abstract: “Vincere scis, Hannibal, victoria uti nescis/you know how to gain a victory, Hannibal, you know not how to use one”. On 2nd. August 216 B.C., the carthaginian general Hannibal, caused the Romans a devastating defeat in the proximities of Cannae. After the battle his cavalry commander, Maha...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Zimmermann, Klaus
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Universidad Católica Argentina. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales. Departamento de Historia 2019
Materias:
GUERRAS PUNICAS
ANALISIS HISTORICO
Livio, Tito, ca. 59 a C.-17 d C.
HISTORIA DE ROMA
LITERATURA LATINA
Acceso en línea:https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/9165
Aporte de:
Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Católica Argentina (UCA) de Universidad Católica Argentina
id I33-R139123456789-9165
record_format dspace
institution Universidad Católica Argentina
institution_str I-33
repository_str R-139
collection Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Católica Argentina (UCA)
language Español
topic GUERRAS PUNICAS
ANALISIS HISTORICO
Livio, Tito, ca. 59 a C.-17 d C.
HISTORIA DE ROMA
LITERATURA LATINA
spellingShingle GUERRAS PUNICAS
ANALISIS HISTORICO
Livio, Tito, ca. 59 a C.-17 d C.
HISTORIA DE ROMA
LITERATURA LATINA
Zimmermann, Klaus
Hannibal ante portas : ¿por qué desistió Aníbal de capturar Roma en el 216 a.C.?
topic_facet GUERRAS PUNICAS
ANALISIS HISTORICO
Livio, Tito, ca. 59 a C.-17 d C.
HISTORIA DE ROMA
LITERATURA LATINA
description Abstract: “Vincere scis, Hannibal, victoria uti nescis/you know how to gain a victory, Hannibal, you know not how to use one”. On 2nd. August 216 B.C., the carthaginian general Hannibal, caused the Romans a devastating defeat in the proximities of Cannae. After the battle his cavalry commander, Maharbal, advised the general that the final victory was imminent if at that time he mobilized his troops against the city of Rome. The Roman historian Livy, who lived almost three centuries after these events, describes this scene (22, 51, 1-4). He attributes the famous phrase to Maharbal, after Hannibal's refusal to follow his advice and adds, that by this refusal, Rome and the Roman Empire were saved from destruction. Did Maharbal know on August 2nd. that Rome could be destroyed? Did Hannibal later regret not having followed the advice of his cavalry chief? Is Livy's conclusion on the alleged inaction of the carthaginian historically plausible? Or is it that the historian from his perspective and with knowledge of the further development of the history of Rome, sees in Hannibal's action the salvation of Rome, turning his perspective into a distorted retrospective? Which eventually leads to an erroneous historical analysis.
format Artículo
author Zimmermann, Klaus
author_facet Zimmermann, Klaus
author_sort Zimmermann, Klaus
title Hannibal ante portas : ¿por qué desistió Aníbal de capturar Roma en el 216 a.C.?
title_short Hannibal ante portas : ¿por qué desistió Aníbal de capturar Roma en el 216 a.C.?
title_full Hannibal ante portas : ¿por qué desistió Aníbal de capturar Roma en el 216 a.C.?
title_fullStr Hannibal ante portas : ¿por qué desistió Aníbal de capturar Roma en el 216 a.C.?
title_full_unstemmed Hannibal ante portas : ¿por qué desistió Aníbal de capturar Roma en el 216 a.C.?
title_sort hannibal ante portas : ¿por qué desistió aníbal de capturar roma en el 216 a.c.?
publisher Universidad Católica Argentina. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales. Departamento de Historia
publishDate 2019
url https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/9165
work_keys_str_mv AT zimmermannklaus hannibalanteportasporquedesistioanibaldecapturarromaenel216ac
AT zimmermannklaus hannibalanteportaswhydidhannibaldeclinetocaptureromainbc216
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820529151213571

Ejemplares similares