King Taita and his “Palistin” : philistine state or neo-hittite kingdom?

Abstract: The end of the Hittite Empire and the destruction and abandonment of Alalakh represents a cultural break between the Late Bronze and Early Iron Ages in the ‘Amuq Valley. In the Iron I, a population with clear ties to the greater Aegean world, perhaps related to the Philistines of southern...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Emanuel, Jeffrey P.
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales. Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente 2019
Materias:
ORIENTE ANTIGUO
EDAD DE BRONCE
EDAD DE HIERRO
TOPONIMIA
HISTORIA ANTIGUA
POBLACIONES ANTIGUAS
HITITAS
FILISTEOS
Acceso en línea:https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/6619
Aporte de:
Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Católica Argentina (UCA) de Universidad Católica Argentina
id I33-R139123456789-6619
record_format dspace
institution Universidad Católica Argentina
institution_str I-33
repository_str R-139
collection Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Católica Argentina (UCA)
language Inglés
topic ORIENTE ANTIGUO
EDAD DE BRONCE
EDAD DE HIERRO
TOPONIMIA
HISTORIA ANTIGUA
POBLACIONES ANTIGUAS
HITITAS
FILISTEOS
spellingShingle ORIENTE ANTIGUO
EDAD DE BRONCE
EDAD DE HIERRO
TOPONIMIA
HISTORIA ANTIGUA
POBLACIONES ANTIGUAS
HITITAS
FILISTEOS
Emanuel, Jeffrey P.
King Taita and his “Palistin” : philistine state or neo-hittite kingdom?
topic_facet ORIENTE ANTIGUO
EDAD DE BRONCE
EDAD DE HIERRO
TOPONIMIA
HISTORIA ANTIGUA
POBLACIONES ANTIGUAS
HITITAS
FILISTEOS
description Abstract: The end of the Hittite Empire and the destruction and abandonment of Alalakh represents a cultural break between the Late Bronze and Early Iron Ages in the ‘Amuq Valley. In the Iron I, a population with clear ties to the greater Aegean world, perhaps related to the Philistines of southern Canaan, established an agro-pastoral settlement at Tell Ta‘yinat and the surrounding area. This occupation, marked by Field Phases 6–3 at Ta‘yinat, was both materially and chronologically ephemeral, and should be viewed as a cultural outlier sandwiched between the Hittite-controlled LBA and later Iron I. This intrusive population lived alongside the indigenous inhabitants of the ‘Amuq, bequeathing to the region a toponym—Palistin—that would far outlast their own relevance and archaeological visibility. By the First Building Period at Tell Ta‘yinat, which followed the Aegean-related phases, the site was home to a dynasty overseeing a typical Neo-Hittite state, with its toponym all that remained of the “Sea Peoples” presence that occupied it at the beginning of the Iron Age.
format Artículo
author Emanuel, Jeffrey P.
author_facet Emanuel, Jeffrey P.
author_sort Emanuel, Jeffrey P.
title King Taita and his “Palistin” : philistine state or neo-hittite kingdom?
title_short King Taita and his “Palistin” : philistine state or neo-hittite kingdom?
title_full King Taita and his “Palistin” : philistine state or neo-hittite kingdom?
title_fullStr King Taita and his “Palistin” : philistine state or neo-hittite kingdom?
title_full_unstemmed King Taita and his “Palistin” : philistine state or neo-hittite kingdom?
title_sort king taita and his “palistin” : philistine state or neo-hittite kingdom?
publisher Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales. Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente
publishDate 2019
url https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/6619
work_keys_str_mv AT emanueljeffreyp kingtaitaandhispalistinphilistinestateorneohittitekingdom
AT emanueljeffreyp elreytaitaysupalistinestadofilisteooreinoneohitita
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820528749608960

Ejemplares similares