The pottery of Edom : a correction

Abstract: This article deals with several claims recently made by Levy et al.1 regarding pottery from Edom and sites in the Negev. Building their argument on two assumptions—that Khirbet en-Nahas constitutes part of Edom and that the fortress there dates to the 10th century BCE—they maintain that...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Finkelstein, Israel, Singer-Avitz, Lily
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales. Departamento de Historia. Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/12023
Aporte de:
id I33-R139123456789-12023
record_format dspace
institution Universidad Católica Argentina
institution_str I-33
repository_str R-139
collection Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Católica Argentina (UCA)
language Inglés
topic CERAMICA
ARQUEOLOGIA
HISTORIA ANTIGUA
Edom
spellingShingle CERAMICA
ARQUEOLOGIA
HISTORIA ANTIGUA
Edom
Finkelstein, Israel
Singer-Avitz, Lily
The pottery of Edom : a correction
topic_facet CERAMICA
ARQUEOLOGIA
HISTORIA ANTIGUA
Edom
description Abstract: This article deals with several claims recently made by Levy et al.1 regarding pottery from Edom and sites in the Negev. Building their argument on two assumptions—that Khirbet en-Nahas constitutes part of Edom and that the fortress there dates to the 10th century BCE—they maintain that sites on the Edomite plateau had been dated to the late 7th–6th centuries BCE based on a single find—the seal impression carrying the inscription “Qos Gabr king of Edom”—and hint that this pottery should in fact be dated earlier. And based on the architectural similarity between the fortress at Khirbet en-Nahas and the fortresses of Tell el-Kheleifeh at the head of the Gulf of Aqaba and of En HaÐeva in the western Arabah south of the Dead Sea, they date the latter two to the 10th century BCE, several centuries earlier than the broadly-accepted date in the Iron IIB/C. In this article we take issue with these claims. We show that dating the sites on the Edomite plateau to the late 8th-to-early 6th centuries BCE is backed by meticulous comparison to well-stratified and dated sites in southern Judah. We also show that the fortresses of Tell el-Kheleifeh and En HaÐeva cannot be dated earlier than the late 8th century. We then deal with the reasons for Levy et al.’s errors.
format Artículo
author Finkelstein, Israel
Singer-Avitz, Lily
author_facet Finkelstein, Israel
Singer-Avitz, Lily
author_sort Finkelstein, Israel
title The pottery of Edom : a correction
title_short The pottery of Edom : a correction
title_full The pottery of Edom : a correction
title_fullStr The pottery of Edom : a correction
title_full_unstemmed The pottery of Edom : a correction
title_sort pottery of edom : a correction
publisher Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales. Departamento de Historia. Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente
publishDate 2021
url https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/12023
work_keys_str_mv AT finkelsteinisrael thepotteryofedomacorrection
AT singeravitzlily thepotteryofedomacorrection
AT finkelsteinisrael laceramicadeedomunacorreccion
AT singeravitzlily laceramicadeedomunacorreccion
AT finkelsteinisrael potteryofedomacorrection
AT singeravitzlily potteryofedomacorrection
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820525313425408