And yet, a nomadic error : a reply to Israel Finkelstein

Abstract: Israel Finkelstein’s detailed criticism of my 2019 publication “The Architectural Bias in Current Biblical Archaeology” provides an opportunity to further clarify my arguments, and to deepen the discussion on issues related to the early Iron Age archaeology of the Arabah and nearby regi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ben-Yosef, Erez
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales. Departamento de Historia. Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/11725
Aporte de:
id I33-R139123456789-11725
record_format dspace
institution Universidad Católica Argentina
institution_str I-33
repository_str R-139
collection Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Católica Argentina (UCA)
language Inglés
topic ARQUEOLOGIA BIBLICA
NOMADISMO
EDAD DE HIERRO
HISTORIA DE ISRAEL
spellingShingle ARQUEOLOGIA BIBLICA
NOMADISMO
EDAD DE HIERRO
HISTORIA DE ISRAEL
Ben-Yosef, Erez
And yet, a nomadic error : a reply to Israel Finkelstein
topic_facet ARQUEOLOGIA BIBLICA
NOMADISMO
EDAD DE HIERRO
HISTORIA DE ISRAEL
description Abstract: Israel Finkelstein’s detailed criticism of my 2019 publication “The Architectural Bias in Current Biblical Archaeology” provides an opportunity to further clarify my arguments, and to deepen the discussion on issues related to the early Iron Age archaeology of the Arabah and nearby regions. In addition to pointing out specific problems in Finkelstein’s treatment of the archaeological evidence—the dating of Khirbat en-Nahas fortress, the material culture of Tel Masos and more—I elaborate on my main argument regarding the prevailing methodological deficiencies in the interpretation of biblical-era nomads. I maintain that the chance discovery of a strong nomadic polity in the Arabah, whose existence is known to us solely because of its engagement in the archaeologically-visible copper production activities, necessitates a revision in the common treatment of nomads in archaeology-based historical reconstructions. The basic conclusion is that archaeology is inadequate for providing any substantial historical and social insights regarding mobile societies; and while it might be frustrating to scholars who use archaeology as history, adhering to notions about nomadic existence that have not changed much since the days of William Foxwell Albright is not conducive to the quest for accurate historical realities (to the degree that these even exist).
format Artículo
author Ben-Yosef, Erez
author_facet Ben-Yosef, Erez
author_sort Ben-Yosef, Erez
title And yet, a nomadic error : a reply to Israel Finkelstein
title_short And yet, a nomadic error : a reply to Israel Finkelstein
title_full And yet, a nomadic error : a reply to Israel Finkelstein
title_fullStr And yet, a nomadic error : a reply to Israel Finkelstein
title_full_unstemmed And yet, a nomadic error : a reply to Israel Finkelstein
title_sort and yet, a nomadic error : a reply to israel finkelstein
publisher Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales. Departamento de Historia. Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente
publishDate 2021
url https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/11725
work_keys_str_mv AT benyoseferez andyetanomadicerrorareplytoisraelfinkelstein
AT benyoseferez yaunasiunerrornomadeunarespuestaaisraelfinkelstein
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820525312376832