States, alliances, and subnational inequality: Argentina in comparative perspective, 2003–2019

Economic inequality is unevenly distributed across subnational territorial units, and national averages obscure this variability. What explains variations in inequality within countries? This study argues that the type of subnational governing alliance (regressive or progressive) expressed in the co...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: González, Lucas Isaac, Nazareno, Marcelo
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2024
Materias:
DESIGUALDAD ECONOMICA
POLITICA ECONOMICA
POLITICA COMPARADA
DISTRIBUCION DE LA RIQUEZA
PROVINCIAS ARGENTINAS
PARTICIPACION POLITICA
Acceso en línea:https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/19160
Aporte de:
Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Católica Argentina (UCA) de Universidad Católica Argentina
id I33-R139-123456789-19160
record_format dspace
spelling I33-R139-123456789-191602024-12-05T05:02:06Z States, alliances, and subnational inequality: Argentina in comparative perspective, 2003–2019 González, Lucas Isaac Nazareno, Marcelo DESIGUALDAD ECONOMICA POLITICA ECONOMICA POLITICA COMPARADA DISTRIBUCION DE LA RIQUEZA PROVINCIAS ARGENTINAS PARTICIPACION POLITICA Economic inequality is unevenly distributed across subnational territorial units, and national averages obscure this variability. What explains variations in inequality within countries? This study argues that the type of subnational governing alliance (regressive or progressive) expressed in the composition of government cabinets affects the level of provincial inequality. The study classifies and codes provincial cabinet members according to their economic, political, and social background. These sectors can form part of a progressive (unions, social, and feminist movements) or regressive (agribusiness or large energy companies) alliance. A large-N analysis of original panel data for Argentina between 2003 and 2019 provides empirical support for these claims. The study also analyzes two key cases, Chaco and Corrientes, which show how the different alliances are associated with varying results in inequality. The study concludes by exploring some comparative implications. 2024-12-04T22:13:48Z 2024-12-04T22:13:48Z 2024 Artículo 0048-5950 (impreso) 1747-7107 (online) https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/19160 10.1093/publius/pjae013 eng Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ application/pdf Argentina Siglo XXI Oxford University Press Publius: The Journal of Federalism. Fall 2024, 54, (4)
institution Universidad Católica Argentina
institution_str I-33
repository_str R-139
collection Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Católica Argentina (UCA)
language Inglés
topic DESIGUALDAD ECONOMICA
POLITICA ECONOMICA
POLITICA COMPARADA
DISTRIBUCION DE LA RIQUEZA
PROVINCIAS ARGENTINAS
PARTICIPACION POLITICA
spellingShingle DESIGUALDAD ECONOMICA
POLITICA ECONOMICA
POLITICA COMPARADA
DISTRIBUCION DE LA RIQUEZA
PROVINCIAS ARGENTINAS
PARTICIPACION POLITICA
González, Lucas Isaac
Nazareno, Marcelo
States, alliances, and subnational inequality: Argentina in comparative perspective, 2003–2019
topic_facet DESIGUALDAD ECONOMICA
POLITICA ECONOMICA
POLITICA COMPARADA
DISTRIBUCION DE LA RIQUEZA
PROVINCIAS ARGENTINAS
PARTICIPACION POLITICA
description Economic inequality is unevenly distributed across subnational territorial units, and national averages obscure this variability. What explains variations in inequality within countries? This study argues that the type of subnational governing alliance (regressive or progressive) expressed in the composition of government cabinets affects the level of provincial inequality. The study classifies and codes provincial cabinet members according to their economic, political, and social background. These sectors can form part of a progressive (unions, social, and feminist movements) or regressive (agribusiness or large energy companies) alliance. A large-N analysis of original panel data for Argentina between 2003 and 2019 provides empirical support for these claims. The study also analyzes two key cases, Chaco and Corrientes, which show how the different alliances are associated with varying results in inequality. The study concludes by exploring some comparative implications.
format Artículo
author González, Lucas Isaac
Nazareno, Marcelo
author_facet González, Lucas Isaac
Nazareno, Marcelo
author_sort González, Lucas Isaac
title States, alliances, and subnational inequality: Argentina in comparative perspective, 2003–2019
title_short States, alliances, and subnational inequality: Argentina in comparative perspective, 2003–2019
title_full States, alliances, and subnational inequality: Argentina in comparative perspective, 2003–2019
title_fullStr States, alliances, and subnational inequality: Argentina in comparative perspective, 2003–2019
title_full_unstemmed States, alliances, and subnational inequality: Argentina in comparative perspective, 2003–2019
title_sort states, alliances, and subnational inequality: argentina in comparative perspective, 2003–2019
publisher Oxford University Press
publishDate 2024
url https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/19160
work_keys_str_mv AT gonzalezlucasisaac statesalliancesandsubnationalinequalityargentinaincomparativeperspective20032019
AT nazarenomarcelo statesalliancesandsubnationalinequalityargentinaincomparativeperspective20032019
_version_ 1823865119263686656

Ejemplares similares