Post-marxist populism in the twenty-first century

Abstract: This essay presents an outline of the basic ideas put forward by the Marxist theoretical family in the last decades, and it analyzes the case of philosopher Ernesto Laclau (1935-2013). It points out the main resemblances and divergences between his work and the other Marxist formulations:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Salinas, Alejandra M.
Formato: Parte de libro
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Ludwig von Mises Institute 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/15286
Aporte de:
id I33-R139-123456789-15286
record_format dspace
institution Universidad Católica Argentina
institution_str I-33
repository_str R-139
collection Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Católica Argentina (UCA)
language Inglés
topic MARXISMO
FILOSOFIA POLITICA
CAPITALISMO
FILOSOFIA SOCIAL
DOCTRINAS FILOSOFICAS
spellingShingle MARXISMO
FILOSOFIA POLITICA
CAPITALISMO
FILOSOFIA SOCIAL
DOCTRINAS FILOSOFICAS
Salinas, Alejandra M.
Post-marxist populism in the twenty-first century
topic_facet MARXISMO
FILOSOFIA POLITICA
CAPITALISMO
FILOSOFIA SOCIAL
DOCTRINAS FILOSOFICAS
description Abstract: This essay presents an outline of the basic ideas put forward by the Marxist theoretical family in the last decades, and it analyzes the case of philosopher Ernesto Laclau (1935-2013). It points out the main resemblances and divergences between his work and the other Marxist formulations: the desire for political hegemony and the elimination of capitalism reveals its Marxist nature. The rejection of economic essentialism and historical determinism shows its Post-Marxist traits. Laclau’s work is ultimately a variety of Marxism in that it advances an anti-capitalist, anti-liberal theory, methodological collectivism, and unlimited State power. His apology of the “subversion and dislocation” of social life, the defense of unbridled political antagonism, and a hegemonic government confront the core of classical liberal theory: the protection of free cooperative individual exchanges, the rule of law, and the design of a minimal government. Since the mid-1980s, the demise of the Soviet-bloc regimes accelerated a number of diverse intellectual reactions which had been in the works during the precedent decades, in an attempt to offer a revision of the shortcomings and/or to explain the discrepancies between historical practices and theoretical Marxism. The latter can be grouped into four main perspectives: the classical, rooted in a strict defense of Marxist economics; the Neo-Marxist approach to cultural analysis; the Analytical, which emphasizes normative considerations, and the Post-Marxist, anchored in the political construction of social antagonism. Although they differ in their evaluative and normative premises, all groups share an ultimate goal: the examination of possible avenues to advance the main ideal of Marxism, a society where capitalism disappears or is subject to stringent political controls.
format Parte de libro
author Salinas, Alejandra M.
author_facet Salinas, Alejandra M.
author_sort Salinas, Alejandra M.
title Post-marxist populism in the twenty-first century
title_short Post-marxist populism in the twenty-first century
title_full Post-marxist populism in the twenty-first century
title_fullStr Post-marxist populism in the twenty-first century
title_full_unstemmed Post-marxist populism in the twenty-first century
title_sort post-marxist populism in the twenty-first century
publisher Ludwig von Mises Institute
publishDate 2022
url https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/15286
work_keys_str_mv AT salinasalejandram postmarxistpopulisminthetwentyfirstcentury
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820525724467203