Energy requirements, GHG emissions and investment costs in natural gas sweetening processes

"Currently, different technologies are being employed to remove CO2 and H2S from the natural gas. Based on chemical phenomenon, the absorption using alkanolamines is probably the most extended process for the acid gas removal. However, membrane technologies are considered as an alternative in s...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gutiérrez, Juan Pablo, Ale Ruiz, Elisa Liliana, Erdmann, Eleonora
Formato: Artículos de Publicaciones Periódicas acceptedVersion
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://ri.itba.edu.ar/handle/123456789/1863
Aporte de:
id I32-R138-123456789-1863
record_format dspace
spelling I32-R138-123456789-18632022-12-07T13:06:58Z Energy requirements, GHG emissions and investment costs in natural gas sweetening processes Gutiérrez, Juan Pablo Ale Ruiz, Elisa Liliana Erdmann, Eleonora GAS NATURAL MEMBRANAS POLIMERICAS EFECTO INVERNADERO EFICIENCIA ENERGETICA ANALISIS DE COSTOS "Currently, different technologies are being employed to remove CO2 and H2S from the natural gas. Based on chemical phenomenon, the absorption using alkanolamines is probably the most extended process for the acid gas removal. However, membrane technologies are considered as an alternative in specific cases for their better performances, cleanness, energy requirements, operative costs and location flexibility. The aim of this article is to estimate, compare and analyze the energy requirements, greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions and investment costs of three Natural Gas Sweetening processes. For the study, a regular process using methyldiethanolamine (MDEA), the absorption process using recompressed vapor and a membrane system were simulated using Aspen Hysys v8.8. For the first case, real data from the gas plant Aguaragüe (Argentina) was used to validate the model. To establish a proper comparison, a natural gas with 4 mol.% of CO2 is considered as the inlet stream of each configuration. Specifically, compression and pump power, specific total heat, removed CO2, CH4 wastes and capital costs were estimated and compared for each case. Additionally, a discussion including different aspects in regard to the energy efficiency of the processes was conducted. Although the proposed membrane system demonstrated to reduce the energy requirements (77% and 72%) and emissions (80% and 76%) in respect to both absorption processes, the CH4 losses were higher by more than 6 factor. Moreover, the investment cost of the technology is 12% higher than the required capital of a conventional amine process." 2020-01-21T17:44:28Z 2020-01-21T17:44:28Z 2017-01 Artículos de Publicaciones Periódicas info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion 1875-5100 http://ri.itba.edu.ar/handle/123456789/1863 en info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.12.036 application/pdf
institution Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires (ITBA)
institution_str I-32
repository_str R-138
collection Repositorio Institucional Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires (ITBA)
language Inglés
topic GAS NATURAL
MEMBRANAS POLIMERICAS
EFECTO INVERNADERO
EFICIENCIA ENERGETICA
ANALISIS DE COSTOS
spellingShingle GAS NATURAL
MEMBRANAS POLIMERICAS
EFECTO INVERNADERO
EFICIENCIA ENERGETICA
ANALISIS DE COSTOS
Gutiérrez, Juan Pablo
Ale Ruiz, Elisa Liliana
Erdmann, Eleonora
Energy requirements, GHG emissions and investment costs in natural gas sweetening processes
topic_facet GAS NATURAL
MEMBRANAS POLIMERICAS
EFECTO INVERNADERO
EFICIENCIA ENERGETICA
ANALISIS DE COSTOS
description "Currently, different technologies are being employed to remove CO2 and H2S from the natural gas. Based on chemical phenomenon, the absorption using alkanolamines is probably the most extended process for the acid gas removal. However, membrane technologies are considered as an alternative in specific cases for their better performances, cleanness, energy requirements, operative costs and location flexibility. The aim of this article is to estimate, compare and analyze the energy requirements, greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions and investment costs of three Natural Gas Sweetening processes. For the study, a regular process using methyldiethanolamine (MDEA), the absorption process using recompressed vapor and a membrane system were simulated using Aspen Hysys v8.8. For the first case, real data from the gas plant Aguaragüe (Argentina) was used to validate the model. To establish a proper comparison, a natural gas with 4 mol.% of CO2 is considered as the inlet stream of each configuration. Specifically, compression and pump power, specific total heat, removed CO2, CH4 wastes and capital costs were estimated and compared for each case. Additionally, a discussion including different aspects in regard to the energy efficiency of the processes was conducted. Although the proposed membrane system demonstrated to reduce the energy requirements (77% and 72%) and emissions (80% and 76%) in respect to both absorption processes, the CH4 losses were higher by more than 6 factor. Moreover, the investment cost of the technology is 12% higher than the required capital of a conventional amine process."
format Artículos de Publicaciones Periódicas
acceptedVersion
author Gutiérrez, Juan Pablo
Ale Ruiz, Elisa Liliana
Erdmann, Eleonora
author_facet Gutiérrez, Juan Pablo
Ale Ruiz, Elisa Liliana
Erdmann, Eleonora
author_sort Gutiérrez, Juan Pablo
title Energy requirements, GHG emissions and investment costs in natural gas sweetening processes
title_short Energy requirements, GHG emissions and investment costs in natural gas sweetening processes
title_full Energy requirements, GHG emissions and investment costs in natural gas sweetening processes
title_fullStr Energy requirements, GHG emissions and investment costs in natural gas sweetening processes
title_full_unstemmed Energy requirements, GHG emissions and investment costs in natural gas sweetening processes
title_sort energy requirements, ghg emissions and investment costs in natural gas sweetening processes
publishDate 2020
url http://ri.itba.edu.ar/handle/123456789/1863
work_keys_str_mv AT gutierrezjuanpablo energyrequirementsghgemissionsandinvestmentcostsinnaturalgassweeteningprocesses
AT aleruizelisaliliana energyrequirementsghgemissionsandinvestmentcostsinnaturalgassweeteningprocesses
AT erdmanneleonora energyrequirementsghgemissionsandinvestmentcostsinnaturalgassweeteningprocesses
_version_ 1765660716846546944