Iglesia y poder: el mito de Constantino y el papado romano

Mostrar todas las versiones(3)

The historical figure of Constantine became a hagiographic myth by Christian apologists (Lactantius, Eusebius of Caesarea, and others) and in the emperor's life and especially after his death. But the myth experienced different journeys in both Parties Imperii: in the West, with the disappearan...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Teja, Ramón
Formato: publishedVersion Artículo
Lenguaje:Español
Español
Publicado: Actas y comunicaciones del Instituto de Historia Antigua y Medieval 2017
Materias:
Constantine
Myth
Church
papacy
power
Constantino
mito
Iglesia
papado
poder
Acceso en línea:http://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/AcHAM/article/view/2702
http://repositorio.filo.uba.ar/handle/filodigital/3158
Aporte de:
FILO Digital - Repositorio de la Facultad de Filosofía y Letras (UBA) de Universidad de Buenos Aires
id I28-R156filodigital-3158
record_format dspace
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-156
collection FILO Digital - Repositorio de la Facultad de Filosofía y Letras (UBA)
language Español
Español
topic Constantine
Myth
Church
papacy
power
Constantino
mito
Iglesia
papado
poder
spellingShingle Constantine
Myth
Church
papacy
power
Constantino
mito
Iglesia
papado
poder
Teja, Ramón
Iglesia y poder: el mito de Constantino y el papado romano
topic_facet Constantine
Myth
Church
papacy
power
Constantino
mito
Iglesia
papado
poder
description The historical figure of Constantine became a hagiographic myth by Christian apologists (Lactantius, Eusebius of Caesarea, and others) and in the emperor's life and especially after his death. But the myth experienced different journeys in both Parties Imperii: in the West, with the disappearance of Arianism and aspirations to the primacy of the bishops of Rome, he proceeded to rework important aspects of the life of the emperor to support the aspirations of the emerging papacy. It was thus emerged first in the V century, the legend of the Actus Silvestri he attributed to the bishop of Rome Sylvester (314-335) a prominence it never had: the conversion and baptism of Constantine and the attribution to the Bishop of Rome primacy over other bishops. Another legend later, the Donatio Constantini, attributed the granting of a temporary power over all Italy. These legends were used by medieval popes to substantiate the figure of the popeemperor against the aspirations of the Holy Roman Emperor. The demonstration by the Humanists of the Renaissance of the falsity of these works did not alter the aspirations of the papacy, while the Protestant Reformers uses it to attack the figure of the pope and rework a new mythic image of Constantine in line with their interests. But the Roman Church has survived the criticism of the Renaissance, the Enlightenment and the modern revolutions Pope still maintains some manifestations of power and ceremony that he inherited from the Roman emperors.
format publishedVersion
Artículo
Artículo
author Teja, Ramón
author_facet Teja, Ramón
author_sort Teja, Ramón
title Iglesia y poder: el mito de Constantino y el papado romano
title_short Iglesia y poder: el mito de Constantino y el papado romano
title_full Iglesia y poder: el mito de Constantino y el papado romano
title_fullStr Iglesia y poder: el mito de Constantino y el papado romano
title_full_unstemmed Iglesia y poder: el mito de Constantino y el papado romano
title_sort iglesia y poder: el mito de constantino y el papado romano
publisher Actas y comunicaciones del Instituto de Historia Antigua y Medieval
publishDate 2017
url http://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/AcHAM/article/view/2702
http://repositorio.filo.uba.ar/handle/filodigital/3158
work_keys_str_mv AT tejaramon iglesiaypoderelmitodeconstantinoyelpapadoromano
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820520372535298

Ejemplares similares