Rethinking the Monism-Dualism Debate in Anthropology of the Body

Within the field of anthropology of the body, experts have historically discussed the monism-dualism debate, which involves comparative reflection of the mind-body, person-world links in different societies. This paper examines and complicates two aspects of the debate: a) The thinking of Descartes,...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Puglisi, Rodolfo; Instituto de Ciencias Antropológicas (FFyL, UBA).
Formato: publishedVersion Artículo
Lenguaje:Español
Español
Publicado: Cuadernos de antropología social 2016
Materias:
Corporality
Mind
Person
Descartes
Triadic
Cuerpo
Mente
Persona
Tríadico
Corpo
Pessoa
Ternário
Acceso en línea:http://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/CAS/article/view/1279
http://repositorio.filo.uba.ar/handle/filodigital/2539
Aporte de:
FILO Digital - Repositorio de la Facultad de Filosofía y Letras (UBA) de Universidad de Buenos Aires
id I28-R156filodigital-2539
record_format dspace
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-156
collection FILO Digital - Repositorio de la Facultad de Filosofía y Letras (UBA)
language Español
Español
topic Corporality
Mind
Person
Descartes
Triadic
Cuerpo
Mente
Persona
Descartes
Tríadico
Corpo
Mente
Pessoa
Descartes
Ternário
spellingShingle Corporality
Mind
Person
Descartes
Triadic
Cuerpo
Mente
Persona
Descartes
Tríadico
Corpo
Mente
Pessoa
Descartes
Ternário
Puglisi, Rodolfo; Instituto de Ciencias Antropológicas (FFyL, UBA).
Rethinking the Monism-Dualism Debate in Anthropology of the Body
topic_facet Corporality
Mind
Person
Descartes
Triadic
Cuerpo
Mente
Persona
Descartes
Tríadico
Corpo
Mente
Pessoa
Descartes
Ternário
description Within the field of anthropology of the body, experts have historically discussed the monism-dualism debate, which involves comparative reflection of the mind-body, person-world links in different societies. This paper examines and complicates two aspects of the debate: a) The thinking of Descartes, an ever-present interlocutor in the discussion, is partially characterized, obviating relevant aspects of his work and b) Ethnographic data, such as triadic cosmologies among Sai Baba groups, account for empirical diversity not enclosed within the bounded monism-dualism opposition.
format publishedVersion
Artículo
Artículo
author Puglisi, Rodolfo; Instituto de Ciencias Antropológicas (FFyL, UBA).
author_facet Puglisi, Rodolfo; Instituto de Ciencias Antropológicas (FFyL, UBA).
author_sort Puglisi, Rodolfo; Instituto de Ciencias Antropológicas (FFyL, UBA).
title Rethinking the Monism-Dualism Debate in Anthropology of the Body
title_short Rethinking the Monism-Dualism Debate in Anthropology of the Body
title_full Rethinking the Monism-Dualism Debate in Anthropology of the Body
title_fullStr Rethinking the Monism-Dualism Debate in Anthropology of the Body
title_full_unstemmed Rethinking the Monism-Dualism Debate in Anthropology of the Body
title_sort rethinking the monism-dualism debate in anthropology of the body
publisher Cuadernos de antropología social
publishDate 2016
url http://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/CAS/article/view/1279
http://repositorio.filo.uba.ar/handle/filodigital/2539
work_keys_str_mv AT puglisirodolfoinstitutodecienciasantropologicasffyluba rethinkingthemonismdualismdebateinanthropologyofthebody
AT puglisirodolfoinstitutodecienciasantropologicasffyluba repensandoeldebatemonismoversusdualismoenlaantropologiadelcuerpo
AT puglisirodolfoinstitutodecienciasantropologicasffyluba repensandoodebatemonismoversusdualismonaantropologiadocorpo
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820520335835137

Ejemplares similares