Cytological analysis of hybrids among triticales and trigopiros

We studied three different tricepiros: (Don Santiago x Don Noé), (Cumé x Horovitz) and (Cumé x Don Noé). The tricepiro (Don Santiago x Don Noé) was obtained by crossing the triticale Don Santiago INTA (AABBRR, 2n = 6x = 42) with the trigopiro Don Noé INTA (AABBDDJJ, 2n = 8x = 56). The number of chro...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fradkin, M., Greizerstein, E., Paccapelo, H., Ferreira, V., Grassi, E., Poggio, L., Ferrari, M.R.
Formato: Artículo publishedVersion
Publicado: 2009
Materias:
rye
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_14154757_v32_n4_p797_Fradkin
http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=artiaex&d=paper_14154757_v32_n4_p797_Fradkin_oai
Aporte de:
id I28-R145-paper_14154757_v32_n4_p797_Fradkin_oai
record_format dspace
spelling I28-R145-paper_14154757_v32_n4_p797_Fradkin_oai2020-10-19 Fradkin, M. Greizerstein, E. Paccapelo, H. Ferreira, V. Grassi, E. Poggio, L. Ferrari, M.R. 2009 We studied three different tricepiros: (Don Santiago x Don Noé), (Cumé x Horovitz) and (Cumé x Don Noé). The tricepiro (Don Santiago x Don Noé) was obtained by crossing the triticale Don Santiago INTA (AABBRR, 2n = 6x = 42) with the trigopiro Don Noé INTA (AABBDDJJ, 2n = 8x = 56). The number of chromosomes for the F1 was 2n = 49, the most frequent meiotic configuration being 14 bivalents and 21 univalents. The univalents were situated in the periphery of the equatorial plane, whereas the bivalents were located in the central zone. The chromatids in some of the univalents split when bivalents underwent reductional division in anaphase I. There were few laggard chromosomes or chromatids at this phase. The number of chromosomes (2n = 48-58) was high and variable, and the number of bivalents per cell (18-23) also high in F3 individuals. In all F8 tricepiros (Don Santiago x Don Noé), F12 tricepiros (Cumé x Horovitz) and F12 tricepiros (Cumé x Don Noé), the number of chromosomes (2n = 42) was the same, these retaining the rye genome, as demonstrated by GISH and FISH. These new synthesized allopolyploids constitute interesting models for investigating the evolutionary changes responsible for diploidization, and the chromosomal and genomic re-ordering that cannot be revealed in natural allopolyploids. Copyright © 2009, Sociedade Brasileira de Genética. Fil:Fradkin, M. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. Fil:Greizerstein, E. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. Fil:Poggio, L. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. Fil:Ferrari, M.R. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_14154757_v32_n4_p797_Fradkin info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar Genet. Mol. Biol. 2009;32(4):797-801 Hybrids Meiosis Reductional division Tricepiro Univalents genomic DNA allopolyploidy anaphase article chromatid chromosome analysis chromosome number cultivar fluorescence in situ hybridization genomic in situ hybridization hybrid meiosis nonhuman plant chromosome rye Secale cereale Triticosecale Cytological analysis of hybrids among triticales and trigopiros info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=artiaex&d=paper_14154757_v32_n4_p797_Fradkin_oai
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-145
collection Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)
topic Hybrids
Meiosis
Reductional division
Tricepiro
Univalents
genomic DNA
allopolyploidy
anaphase
article
chromatid
chromosome analysis
chromosome number
cultivar
fluorescence in situ hybridization
genomic in situ hybridization
hybrid
meiosis
nonhuman
plant chromosome
rye
Secale cereale
Triticosecale
spellingShingle Hybrids
Meiosis
Reductional division
Tricepiro
Univalents
genomic DNA
allopolyploidy
anaphase
article
chromatid
chromosome analysis
chromosome number
cultivar
fluorescence in situ hybridization
genomic in situ hybridization
hybrid
meiosis
nonhuman
plant chromosome
rye
Secale cereale
Triticosecale
Fradkin, M.
Greizerstein, E.
Paccapelo, H.
Ferreira, V.
Grassi, E.
Poggio, L.
Ferrari, M.R.
Cytological analysis of hybrids among triticales and trigopiros
topic_facet Hybrids
Meiosis
Reductional division
Tricepiro
Univalents
genomic DNA
allopolyploidy
anaphase
article
chromatid
chromosome analysis
chromosome number
cultivar
fluorescence in situ hybridization
genomic in situ hybridization
hybrid
meiosis
nonhuman
plant chromosome
rye
Secale cereale
Triticosecale
description We studied three different tricepiros: (Don Santiago x Don Noé), (Cumé x Horovitz) and (Cumé x Don Noé). The tricepiro (Don Santiago x Don Noé) was obtained by crossing the triticale Don Santiago INTA (AABBRR, 2n = 6x = 42) with the trigopiro Don Noé INTA (AABBDDJJ, 2n = 8x = 56). The number of chromosomes for the F1 was 2n = 49, the most frequent meiotic configuration being 14 bivalents and 21 univalents. The univalents were situated in the periphery of the equatorial plane, whereas the bivalents were located in the central zone. The chromatids in some of the univalents split when bivalents underwent reductional division in anaphase I. There were few laggard chromosomes or chromatids at this phase. The number of chromosomes (2n = 48-58) was high and variable, and the number of bivalents per cell (18-23) also high in F3 individuals. In all F8 tricepiros (Don Santiago x Don Noé), F12 tricepiros (Cumé x Horovitz) and F12 tricepiros (Cumé x Don Noé), the number of chromosomes (2n = 42) was the same, these retaining the rye genome, as demonstrated by GISH and FISH. These new synthesized allopolyploids constitute interesting models for investigating the evolutionary changes responsible for diploidization, and the chromosomal and genomic re-ordering that cannot be revealed in natural allopolyploids. Copyright © 2009, Sociedade Brasileira de Genética.
format Artículo
Artículo
publishedVersion
author Fradkin, M.
Greizerstein, E.
Paccapelo, H.
Ferreira, V.
Grassi, E.
Poggio, L.
Ferrari, M.R.
author_facet Fradkin, M.
Greizerstein, E.
Paccapelo, H.
Ferreira, V.
Grassi, E.
Poggio, L.
Ferrari, M.R.
author_sort Fradkin, M.
title Cytological analysis of hybrids among triticales and trigopiros
title_short Cytological analysis of hybrids among triticales and trigopiros
title_full Cytological analysis of hybrids among triticales and trigopiros
title_fullStr Cytological analysis of hybrids among triticales and trigopiros
title_full_unstemmed Cytological analysis of hybrids among triticales and trigopiros
title_sort cytological analysis of hybrids among triticales and trigopiros
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_14154757_v32_n4_p797_Fradkin
http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=artiaex&d=paper_14154757_v32_n4_p797_Fradkin_oai
work_keys_str_mv AT fradkinm cytologicalanalysisofhybridsamongtriticalesandtrigopiros
AT greizersteine cytologicalanalysisofhybridsamongtriticalesandtrigopiros
AT paccapeloh cytologicalanalysisofhybridsamongtriticalesandtrigopiros
AT ferreirav cytologicalanalysisofhybridsamongtriticalesandtrigopiros
AT grassie cytologicalanalysisofhybridsamongtriticalesandtrigopiros
AT poggiol cytologicalanalysisofhybridsamongtriticalesandtrigopiros
AT ferrarimr cytologicalanalysisofhybridsamongtriticalesandtrigopiros
_version_ 1766026761878896640