7663

This paper analyzes two rulings recently handed down by the highest courts of justice in Brazil and Argentina, highlighting their positive and negative aspects, respectively. After a brief historical development of Argentine immigration law, both judicial decisions are outlined, on which comments a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Menem, Facundo
Formato:	Artículo publishedVersion
Lenguaje:	Español
Publicado:	Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones 2021
Materias:	Migrantes Familias Derechos humanos Derecho comparado Precedentes judiciales Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República Argentina ? supremo tribunal de la república federativa de brasil Supremo Tribunal de la República Federativa de Brasil CSJN STF Jurisprudencia Migrants Families Human rights Comparative law Judicial precedents Supreme Court of Justice of the Argentine Republic Supreme Federal Court of the Federative Republic of Brazil Jurisprudence
Acceso en línea:	http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pderecho/lecciones&cl=CL1&d=HWA_7663 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pderecho/lecciones/index/assoc/HWA_7663.dir/7663.PDF
Aporte de:	Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) de Universidad de Buenos Aires

id	I28-R145-HWA_7663
record_format	dspace
spelling	I28-R145-HWA_76632024-12-12 7663 This paper analyzes two rulings recently handed down by the highest courts of justice in Brazil and Argentina, highlighting their positive and negative aspects, respectively. After a brief historical development of Argentine immigration law, both judicial decisions are outlined, on which comments and critical considerations are outlined with respect to their repercussions on the legal system and on the family protection of migrants. It is concluded that Argentine legislation and jurisprudence on immigration matters do not guarantee legal security to foreigners living in the country, mainly considering the reforms introduced through the Necessity and Urgency Decree 70/17 (both in their procedural and substantial aspects), and the judgment handed down by the Supreme Court in the "Barrios Rojas" case, insofar as they have left the situation of migrant families subject to the arbitration of a public administration with broad discretionary powers and a restricted judicial control in the hands of a non-specialized jurisdiction. In turn, the judicial decision issued by the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court stands out, as it tends to ensure the union of migrants with their families and the respect of their fundamental rights Fil: Menem, Facundo. Universidad Católica Argentina. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas. Cátedra Concursos y Quiebras. Buenos Aires, Argentina Brasil Argentina Menem, Facundo 2021 El presente trabajo analiza dos sentencias dictadas recientemente por los máximos tribunales de justicia de Brasil y Argentina, resaltando sus aspectos positivos y negativos, respectivamente. Luego de un breve desarrollo histórico del derecho migratorio argentino, se reseñan ambas decisiones judiciales, sobre las que se esbozan comentarios y consideraciones críticas con respecto a sus repercusiones sobre el ordenamiento jurídico y sobre la protección familiar de las personas migrantes. Se concluye que la legislación y la jurisprudencia argentinas en materia migratoria no garantizan seguridad jurídica a los extranjeros que habitan en el país, considerando principalmente las reformas introducidas por medio del Decreto de Necesidad y Urgencia 70/17 (tanto en sus aspectos procesales como sustanciales), y la sentencia dictada por la Corte Suprema en el caso "Barrios Rojas", en cuanto han dejado la situación de las familias migrantes sujeta al arbitrio de una administración pública con amplias potestades discrecionales y a un restringido control judicial en manos de un fuero no especializado en la materia A su vez, se destaca la decisión judicial vertida por el Supremo Tribunal Federal brasileño, en tanto tiende a asegurar la unión de los migrantes con sus familias y el respeto de sus derechos fundamentales application/pdf 0024-0079 (impreso) 2362-4620 (en linea) Migrantes Familias Derechos humanos Derecho comparado Precedentes judiciales Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República Argentina ? supremo tribunal de la república federativa de brasil Supremo Tribunal de la República Federativa de Brasil CSJN STF Jurisprudencia Migrants Families Human rights Comparative law Judicial precedents Supreme Court of Justice of the Argentine Republic Supreme Federal Court of the Federative Republic of Brazil Jurisprudence spa Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ Lecciones y Ensayos, no. 106 La protección familiar de los migrantes: contrapuntos entre las sentencias del Supremo Tribunal Federal Brasileño y la Corte Suprema de Justicia Argentina Family protection of migrants: counter points between the sentences of the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court and the Argentine Supreme Court of Justice info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pderecho/lecciones&cl=CL1&d=HWA_7663 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pderecho/lecciones/index/assoc/HWA_7663.dir/7663.PDF
institution	Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str	I-28
repository_str	R-145
collection	Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)
language	Español
orig_language_str_mv	spa
topic	Migrantes Familias Derechos humanos Derecho comparado Precedentes judiciales Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República Argentina ? supremo tribunal de la república federativa de brasil Supremo Tribunal de la República Federativa de Brasil CSJN STF Jurisprudencia Migrants Families Human rights Comparative law Judicial precedents Supreme Court of Justice of the Argentine Republic Supreme Federal Court of the Federative Republic of Brazil Jurisprudence
spellingShingle	Migrantes Familias Derechos humanos Derecho comparado Precedentes judiciales Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República Argentina ? supremo tribunal de la república federativa de brasil Supremo Tribunal de la República Federativa de Brasil CSJN STF Jurisprudencia Migrants Families Human rights Comparative law Judicial precedents Supreme Court of Justice of the Argentine Republic Supreme Federal Court of the Federative Republic of Brazil Jurisprudence Menem, Facundo 7663
topic_facet	Migrantes Familias Derechos humanos Derecho comparado Precedentes judiciales Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República Argentina ? supremo tribunal de la república federativa de brasil Supremo Tribunal de la República Federativa de Brasil CSJN STF Jurisprudencia Migrants Families Human rights Comparative law Judicial precedents Supreme Court of Justice of the Argentine Republic Supreme Federal Court of the Federative Republic of Brazil Jurisprudence
description	This paper analyzes two rulings recently handed down by the highest courts of justice in Brazil and Argentina, highlighting their positive and negative aspects, respectively. After a brief historical development of Argentine immigration law, both judicial decisions are outlined, on which comments and critical considerations are outlined with respect to their repercussions on the legal system and on the family protection of migrants. It is concluded that Argentine legislation and jurisprudence on immigration matters do not guarantee legal security to foreigners living in the country, mainly considering the reforms introduced through the Necessity and Urgency Decree 70/17 (both in their procedural and substantial aspects), and the judgment handed down by the Supreme Court in the "Barrios Rojas" case, insofar as they have left the situation of migrant families subject to the arbitration of a public administration with broad discretionary powers and a restricted judicial control in the hands of a non-specialized jurisdiction. In turn, the judicial decision issued by the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court stands out, as it tends to ensure the union of migrants with their families and the respect of their fundamental rights
format	Artículo Artículo publishedVersion
author	Menem, Facundo
author_facet	Menem, Facundo
author_sort	Menem, Facundo
title	7663
title_short	7663
title_full	7663
title_fullStr	7663
title_full_unstemmed	7663
title_sort	7663
publisher	Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones
publishDate	2021
url	http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pderecho/lecciones&cl=CL1&d=HWA_7663 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pderecho/lecciones/index/assoc/HWA_7663.dir/7663.PDF
work_keys_str_mv	AT menemfacundo 7663 AT menemfacundo laproteccionfamiliardelosmigrantescontrapuntosentrelassentenciasdelsupremotribunalfederalbrasilenoylacortesupremadejusticiaargentina AT menemfacundo familyprotectionofmigrantscounterpointsbetweenthesentencesofthebraziliansupremefederalcourtandtheargentinesupremecourtofjustice
_version_	1824359858028150784

7663

Ejemplares similares