UBA, FADU Universidad Facultad de...
Law 20.249, also known as the Lafkenche Law, established the Coastal-Marine Spaces of Indigenous Peoples (ECMPO), revealing historical inequalities and conflicts between the Chilean state and coastal indigenous communities. This has exposed tensions resulting from an institutional structure that sti...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Otros Autores: | |
| Formato: | Tesis de maestría acceptedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Arquitectura, Diseño y Urbanismo
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=aaqmas&cl=CL1&d=HWA_7602 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/aaqmas/index/assoc/HWA_7602.dir/7602.PDF |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | Law 20.249, also known as the Lafkenche Law, established the Coastal-Marine Spaces of Indigenous Peoples (ECMPO), revealing historical inequalities and conflicts between the Chilean state and coastal indigenous communities. This has exposed tensions resulting from an institutional structure that still needs to address its shortcomings in the territorial planning of coastal areas. This consideration takes into account the current situation in Chile, including an update of the National Coastal Border Use Policy (PNUBC, 1994), a new proposed for a Coastal Law, and a new constitution.\nThis research delved into the socio-territorial tensions triggered by the implementation of this law in three situations. The objective was to identify evaluation criteria that could enhance the integrated management of the coast while respecting indigenous customary rights in Chile. The hypothesis suggested that incorporating analysis from the indigenous perspective, valuing previous governance systems, could improve the resolution of normative conflicts and promote interculturality.\nWith an exploratory approach, the perception of this law among involved stakeholders was evaluated using documentary analysis and semi-structured interviews. The Lafkenche worldview was examined to understand the challenges these communities in coastal regulation and territorial planning.\nThe results demonstrated how this cases interact with coastal planning in Chile, emphasizing the revitalization of cultural practices and the pursuit of inclusion as an opportunity for change. This underscores the need for public policies that bring about social and territorial improvements.\nThe conclusions stood out the importance of involving these communities in coastal planning, illustrating how this Law drives social and territorial governance to uphold indigenous rights. It also emphasized the relevance of collective rights in addressing tensions and achieving sustainable development in the Chilean coastal context, underscoring interculturality and inclusive participation as essential for balancing development and preservation in diverse territories. |
|---|