7546

In this text, I contrast two views on the relationship between rights and democracy. According to the first, rights are to John Locke, and independent of public debate. According to the second view, rights are the result of public debate, a product of human creation, and the result of a history of s...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Gargarella, Roberto
Formato:	Artículo publishedVersion
Lenguaje:	Español
Publicado:	Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones 2024
Materias:	Derechos Democracia Deliberación democrática Locke Bentham Dworkin Ferrajoli Filosofia del derecho Rights Democracy Democratic deliberation Ferrajoli. Philosophy of law
Acceso en línea:	http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pensar&cl=CL1&d=HWA_7546 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pensar/index/assoc/HWA_7546.dir/7546.PDF
Aporte de:	Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) de Universidad de Buenos Aires

id	I28-R145-HWA_7546
record_format	dspace
spelling	I28-R145-HWA_75462024-09-19 7546 In this text, I contrast two views on the relationship between rights and democracy. According to the first, rights are to John Locke, and independent of public debate. According to the second view, rights are the result of public debate, a product of human creation, and the result of a history of social conflicts. In the work, I examine the origins of such views, and their continuities in contemporary constitutional debate."autonomous": entities external to human creation (such as "planets"), linked to self-evident truths, according Fil: Gargarella, Roberto. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Buenos Aires, Argentina Jurisdicción internacional Gargarella, Roberto 2024 En este texto, contrasto dos visiones sobre la relación entre derechos y democracia. De acuerdo con la primera, los derechos son "autónomos": entidades externas a la creación humana (como "planetas"), vinculados con verdades autoevidentes, al decir de John Locke, e independientes del debate público. De acuerdo con la segunda visión, los derechos son el resultado del debate público, producto de la creación humana, y resultado de una historia de conflictos sociales. En el trabajo, examino los orígenes de tales visiones y sus continuidades en el debate constitucional contemporáneo application/pdf 2314-0186 (impreso) 2314-0194 (en linea) Derechos Democracia Deliberación democrática Locke Bentham Dworkin Ferrajoli Filosofia del derecho Rights Democracy Democratic deliberation Locke Bentham Dworkin Ferrajoli. Philosophy of law spa Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ Pensar en Derecho, a.13, no. 24 Derechos y democracia Rights and democracy info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pensar&cl=CL1&d=HWA_7546 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pensar/index/assoc/HWA_7546.dir/7546.PDF
institution	Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str	I-28
repository_str	R-145
collection	Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)
language	Español
orig_language_str_mv	spa
topic	Derechos Democracia Deliberación democrática Locke Bentham Dworkin Ferrajoli Filosofia del derecho Rights Democracy Democratic deliberation Locke Bentham Dworkin Ferrajoli. Philosophy of law
spellingShingle	Derechos Democracia Deliberación democrática Locke Bentham Dworkin Ferrajoli Filosofia del derecho Rights Democracy Democratic deliberation Locke Bentham Dworkin Ferrajoli. Philosophy of law Gargarella, Roberto 7546
topic_facet	Derechos Democracia Deliberación democrática Locke Bentham Dworkin Ferrajoli Filosofia del derecho Rights Democracy Democratic deliberation Locke Bentham Dworkin Ferrajoli. Philosophy of law
description	In this text, I contrast two views on the relationship between rights and democracy. According to the first, rights are to John Locke, and independent of public debate. According to the second view, rights are the result of public debate, a product of human creation, and the result of a history of social conflicts. In the work, I examine the origins of such views, and their continuities in contemporary constitutional debate."autonomous": entities external to human creation (such as "planets"), linked to self-evident truths, according
format	Artículo Artículo publishedVersion
author	Gargarella, Roberto
author_facet	Gargarella, Roberto
author_sort	Gargarella, Roberto
title	7546
title_short	7546
title_full	7546
title_fullStr	7546
title_full_unstemmed	7546
title_sort	7546
publisher	Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones
publishDate	2024
url	http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pensar&cl=CL1&d=HWA_7546 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pensar/index/assoc/HWA_7546.dir/7546.PDF
work_keys_str_mv	AT gargarellaroberto 7546 AT gargarellaroberto derechosydemocracia AT gargarellaroberto rightsanddemocracy
_version_	1824359852121522176

7546

Ejemplares similares