7507
The Employment Contract Law establishes a system of protection against dismissal without cause that regulates the worker's protection mandate conferred to the legislator by the first paragraph of Article 14 bis of the Constitution. The way to protect the weaker party against contractual termina...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones
2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pensar&cl=CL1&d=HWA_7507 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pensar/index/assoc/HWA_7507.dir/7507.PDF |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I28-R145-HWA_7507 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
I28-R145-HWA_75072024-09-09 7507 The Employment Contract Law establishes a system of protection against dismissal without cause that regulates the worker's protection mandate conferred to the legislator by the first paragraph of Article 14 bis of the Constitution. The way to protect the weaker party against contractual termination at will by the employer consists in the imposition of a fixed indemnity to be paid by the employer, to whom the law, at the same time, ensures the effectiveness of the dismissal. This system is, once again, subject to criticism by those who, with the aim of avoiding litigation, postulate its replacement by an individual capitalization fund similar to the one established in Law 22.250 for construction industry personnel or to the one provided for in Austrian legislation. This paper, after reviewing the labor and constitutional legal doctrine, and the international norms integrated into the Argentine legal system, together with the interpretations of their respective control agencies (pursuant to the provisions of article 75.22 of the Fundamental Law), concludes that a legal reform such as the one proposed is inadmissible due to its incompatibility with the higherranking norms. Fil: Garcia, Hector Omar. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Cátedra Derecho del Trabajo y de la Seguridad Social. Buenos Aires, Argentina Fil: Garcia, Hector Omar. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Maestria Derecho del Trabajo. Buenos Aires, Argentina Argentina Garcia, Hector Omar 2023 La Ley de Contrato de Trabajo establece un sistema de protección contra el despido sin causa que reglamenta el mandato tuitivo del trabajador conferido al legislador por el primer párrafo del art. 14 bis de la Constitución Nacional. El modo de proteger al sujeto hiposuficiente contra la extinción contractual dispuesta potestativamente por el empleador consiste en la imposición de una indemnización tarifada a cargo de este, al que la ley por otra parte asegura la eficacia del distracto. Este sistema se encuentra, una vez más, sometido a crítica por opiniones que, tras el objetivo de evitar la litigiosidad, postulan su reemplazo por un fondo de capitalización individual similar al establecido en la Ley 22.250 para el personal de la industria de la construcción o al previsto en la legislación austríaca. El presente trabajo, luego de repasar la doctrina iuslaboral y constitucional, y las normas internacionales integradas al ordenamiento jurídico argentino, junto a las interpretaciones de sus respectivos organismos de control (conforme lo establecido en el art. 75.22 de la norma fundamental), concluye en la inadmisibilidad de una reforma legal como la propuesta por su incompatibilidad con las fuentes de mayor jerarquía. application/pdf 2314-0186 (impreso) 2314-0194 (en linea) Principio protectorio Protección contra el despido arbitrario Indemnización por despido Derecho al trabajo Fondo de cese laboral Mochila austríaca. Protective Principle Protection Against Arbitrary Dismissal Redundancy Payment Right to Work Termination Fund Austrian Backpack spa Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ Pensar en Derecho, a.12, no. 23 Indemnización por despido versus fondo de capitalización individual: apuntes contra una eventual reforma inadmisible Severance indemnity versus individual capitalization fund: notes against a possible inadmissible reform info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pensar&cl=CL1&d=HWA_7507 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pensar/index/assoc/HWA_7507.dir/7507.PDF |
| institution |
Universidad de Buenos Aires |
| institution_str |
I-28 |
| repository_str |
R-145 |
| collection |
Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) |
| language |
Español |
| orig_language_str_mv |
spa |
| topic |
Principio protectorio Protección contra el despido arbitrario Indemnización por despido Derecho al trabajo Fondo de cese laboral Mochila austríaca. Protective Principle Protection Against Arbitrary Dismissal Redundancy Payment Right to Work Termination Fund Austrian Backpack |
| spellingShingle |
Principio protectorio Protección contra el despido arbitrario Indemnización por despido Derecho al trabajo Fondo de cese laboral Mochila austríaca. Protective Principle Protection Against Arbitrary Dismissal Redundancy Payment Right to Work Termination Fund Austrian Backpack Garcia, Hector Omar 7507 |
| topic_facet |
Principio protectorio Protección contra el despido arbitrario Indemnización por despido Derecho al trabajo Fondo de cese laboral Mochila austríaca. Protective Principle Protection Against Arbitrary Dismissal Redundancy Payment Right to Work Termination Fund Austrian Backpack |
| description |
The Employment Contract Law establishes a system of protection against dismissal without cause that regulates the worker's protection mandate conferred to the legislator by the first paragraph of Article 14 bis of the Constitution. The way to protect the weaker party against contractual termination at will by the employer consists in the imposition of a fixed indemnity to be paid by the employer, to whom the law, at the same time, ensures the effectiveness of the dismissal. This system is, once again, subject to criticism by those who, with the aim of avoiding litigation, postulate its replacement by an individual capitalization fund similar to the one established in Law 22.250 for construction industry personnel or to the one provided for in Austrian legislation. This paper, after reviewing the labor and constitutional legal doctrine, and the international norms integrated into the Argentine legal system, together with the interpretations of their respective control agencies (pursuant to the provisions of article 75.22 of the Fundamental Law), concludes that a legal reform such as the one proposed is inadmissible due to its incompatibility with the higherranking norms. |
| format |
Artículo Artículo publishedVersion |
| author |
Garcia, Hector Omar |
| author_facet |
Garcia, Hector Omar |
| author_sort |
Garcia, Hector Omar |
| title |
7507 |
| title_short |
7507 |
| title_full |
7507 |
| title_fullStr |
7507 |
| title_full_unstemmed |
7507 |
| title_sort |
7507 |
| publisher |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| url |
http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pensar&cl=CL1&d=HWA_7507 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pensar/index/assoc/HWA_7507.dir/7507.PDF |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT garciahectoromar 7507 AT garciahectoromar indemnizacionpordespidoversusfondodecapitalizacionindividualapuntescontraunaeventualreformainadmisible AT garciahectoromar severanceindemnityversusindividualcapitalizationfundnotesagainstapossibleinadmissiblereform |
| _version_ |
1824359849502179328 |