Soberanía Estatal y Derechos Humanos: ¿irreconciliables? Un análisis de la validez y los efectos de las reservas a la CEDAW

The present paper begins with a study of the object and purpose of a treaty as a limit to the State?s ability to formulate reservations due to its sovereignty. From this analysis, the paper moves on to the study of the reservations to CEDAW?s substantive rules made by States based on contradictions...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Levin, Julieta
Formato: Artículo publishedVersion
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones 2020
Materias:
Reservas
Consentimiento del Estado
Derechos humanos
Cedaw
Divisibilidad
Convención sobre la Eliminación de todas las Formas de Discriminación contra la Mujer
DIDH
Derecho internacional de los derechos humanos
Discriminacion sexual
Reservations
State consent
Human rights
Severability
Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women
ILHR
International Law of human rights
Sex discrimination
Acceso en línea:http://www.derecho.uba.ar/publicaciones/lye/revistas/105/soberania-estatal-y-derechos-humanos.pdf
http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pderecho/lecciones&cl=CL1&d=HWA_7127
http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pderecho/lecciones/index/assoc/HWA_7127.dir/7127.PDF
Aporte de:
Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) de Universidad de Buenos Aires
Descripción
Sumario:The present paper begins with a study of the object and purpose of a treaty as a limit to the State?s ability to formulate reservations due to its sovereignty. From this analysis, the paper moves on to the study of the reservations to CEDAW?s substantive rules made by States based on contradictions with their local law and their compatibility with its object and purpose. Especially, the analysis focus on the validity of the general reservations and reservations to articles 2 and 16. Finally, the paper studies the effects of the invalid reservations. The hypothesis of this paper suggests that the reservations to CEDAW?s substantive rules based in the States local law are invalid because of their incompatibility with the object and purpose of the treaty but that the reserving States are obliged by the Convention because their consent to be obliged by it prevails over the will of formulating reservations, when these are invalid. The paper arrives to the conclusion that the hypothesis is partially corroborated as the reservations based in local law are not always necessarily invalid.

Ejemplares similares