6793
In 2020 and 2021, Argentina lived, institutionally, in a state of exception. This article studies the events of these months following seminal ideas from Carlos Nino. Specifically, it suggests that the institutional anomie that our country experienced during the pandemic promoted an indifference tow...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.derecho.uba.ar/publicaciones/pensar-en-derecho/revistas/19/una-pandemia-al-margen-de-la-ley.pdf http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pensar&cl=CL1&d=HWA_6793 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pensar/index/assoc/HWA_6793.dir/6793.PDF |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | In 2020 and 2021, Argentina lived, institutionally, in a state of exception. This article studies the events of these months following seminal ideas from Carlos Nino. Specifically, it suggests that the institutional anomie that our country experienced during the pandemic promoted an indifference towards the law, which ended up depriving society of crucial tools to solve urgent intersubjective problems (in the midst of one of the most important crises in our history). The trivialization of exceptional and delicate institutional mechanisms "such as the prolonged suspension of the exercise of human rights, or the marginalization of Congress through the abuse of the decrees of necessity and urgency" encouraged society to renounce to law as a mechanism of social organization, with tragic consequences in sanitary, economic, and social terms. The article suggests that this "silly anomie" and its consequences could have been mitigated if the institutional system had processed the crisis respecting the procedures and mechanisms established in the constitution and in the international human rights treaties that are part of our legal system |
|---|