5500
Abstract: The article explores two current interpretative tendencies that seem to converge in the judicial practice of our country in the enforcement of the law (the interpretivism and the formalism) and which main characteristic derives from the fact that both seem to represent distorted versions o...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo acceptedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pderecho/lecciones&cl=CL1&d=HWA_5500 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pderecho/lecciones/index/assoc/HWA_5500.dir/5500.PDF |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I28-R145-HWA_5500 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
I28-R145-HWA_55002024-12-20 5500 Abstract: The article explores two current interpretative tendencies that seem to converge in the judicial practice of our country in the enforcement of the law (the interpretivism and the formalism) and which main characteristic derives from the fact that both seem to represent distorted versions of the two major occidental judicial models (the common law and the continental law) and, as such, both tendencies seem to conspire against the possibility to develop a consistent judicial practice. Fil: Elfman, Jonas. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Buenos Aires, Argentina Argentina Elfman, Jonas 2019 Sección: Lecciones. -- Resumen: El artículo explora dos tendencias interpretativas actuales que parecen confluir en la práctica jurídica de nuestro país para aplicar el derecho (el interpretativismo y el formalismo) cuya nota distintiva se asienta sobre el hecho de que ambas representarían versiones distorsionadas de los dos grandes modelos judiciales occidentales (el common law y el derecho continental) y, como tales, ambas tendencias conspiran contra la posibilidad de construir una práctica jurídica consistente. application/pdf 0024-0079 (impreso) 2362-4620 (en linea) Interpretativismo Formalismo Derecho Autoridad Iusnaturalismo Positivismo Ciencia del derecho Discurso juridico Historia del derecho Practica juridica Discrecion judicial Interpretacion juridica Decision judicial Independencia judicial Derecho continental Derecho anglosajon Teoria del derecho Facultades del juez Crisis de autoridad Filosofia del derecho Estado de derecho Codigo civil y comercial Constitucion Interpretativism Formalism Law Authority Iusnaturalism Positivism Science of law Law speech History of law Social practice Judicial discretion Legal interpretation Judicial decision Judicial independence Civil law Common law Legal theory Judge profile Authority crisis Rule of law Dog-law Civil Code Constitution Philosophy of law spa Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/(openAccess)(openAccess)(openAccess)(openAccess) Lecciones y Ensayos, no. 102 Ni interpretativismo ni formalismo : cómo construir una práctica jurídica ajena a los extremos info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pderecho/lecciones&cl=CL1&d=HWA_5500 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pderecho/lecciones/index/assoc/HWA_5500.dir/5500.PDF |
| institution |
Universidad de Buenos Aires |
| institution_str |
I-28 |
| repository_str |
R-145 |
| collection |
Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) |
| language |
Español |
| orig_language_str_mv |
spa |
| topic |
Interpretativismo Formalismo Derecho Autoridad Iusnaturalismo Positivismo Ciencia del derecho Discurso juridico Historia del derecho Practica juridica Discrecion judicial Interpretacion juridica Decision judicial Independencia judicial Derecho continental Derecho anglosajon Teoria del derecho Facultades del juez Crisis de autoridad Filosofia del derecho Estado de derecho Codigo civil y comercial Constitucion Interpretativism Formalism Law Authority Iusnaturalism Positivism Science of law Law speech History of law Social practice Judicial discretion Legal interpretation Judicial decision Judicial independence Civil law Common law Legal theory Judge profile Authority crisis Rule of law Dog-law Civil Code Constitution Philosophy of law |
| spellingShingle |
Interpretativismo Formalismo Derecho Autoridad Iusnaturalismo Positivismo Ciencia del derecho Discurso juridico Historia del derecho Practica juridica Discrecion judicial Interpretacion juridica Decision judicial Independencia judicial Derecho continental Derecho anglosajon Teoria del derecho Facultades del juez Crisis de autoridad Filosofia del derecho Estado de derecho Codigo civil y comercial Constitucion Interpretativism Formalism Law Authority Iusnaturalism Positivism Science of law Law speech History of law Social practice Judicial discretion Legal interpretation Judicial decision Judicial independence Civil law Common law Legal theory Judge profile Authority crisis Rule of law Dog-law Civil Code Constitution Philosophy of law Elfman, Jonas 5500 |
| topic_facet |
Interpretativismo Formalismo Derecho Autoridad Iusnaturalismo Positivismo Ciencia del derecho Discurso juridico Historia del derecho Practica juridica Discrecion judicial Interpretacion juridica Decision judicial Independencia judicial Derecho continental Derecho anglosajon Teoria del derecho Facultades del juez Crisis de autoridad Filosofia del derecho Estado de derecho Codigo civil y comercial Constitucion Interpretativism Formalism Law Authority Iusnaturalism Positivism Science of law Law speech History of law Social practice Judicial discretion Legal interpretation Judicial decision Judicial independence Civil law Common law Legal theory Judge profile Authority crisis Rule of law Dog-law Civil Code Constitution Philosophy of law |
| description |
Abstract: The article explores two current interpretative tendencies that seem to converge in the judicial practice of our country in the enforcement of the law (the interpretivism and the formalism) and which main characteristic derives from the fact that both seem to represent distorted versions of the two major occidental judicial models (the common law and the continental law) and, as such, both tendencies seem to conspire against the possibility to develop a consistent judicial practice. |
| format |
Artículo Artículo acceptedVersion |
| author |
Elfman, Jonas |
| author_facet |
Elfman, Jonas |
| author_sort |
Elfman, Jonas |
| title |
5500 |
| title_short |
5500 |
| title_full |
5500 |
| title_fullStr |
5500 |
| title_full_unstemmed |
5500 |
| title_sort |
5500 |
| publisher |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| url |
http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pderecho/lecciones&cl=CL1&d=HWA_5500 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pderecho/lecciones/index/assoc/HWA_5500.dir/5500.PDF |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT elfmanjonas 5500 AT elfmanjonas niinterpretativismoniformalismocomoconstruirunapracticajuridicaajenaalosextremos |
| _version_ |
1824952427465408512 |