5431

This thesis can be understood, synthetically, as a development that: * studies the functions of printed images and the relationships between visual strategies and the historiographic script, in three books on the history of modern architecture, with original versions published in 1941, 1950 and 1960...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Molinos, Rita
Otros Autores: Gutman, Margarita
Formato: Tesis doctoral acceptedVersion
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Arquitectura, Diseño y Urbanismo 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=aaqtesis&cl=CL1&d=HWA_5431
https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/aaqtesis/index/assoc/HWA_5431.dir/5431.PDF
Aporte de:
id I28-R145-HWA_5431
record_format dspace
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-145
collection Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)
language Español
orig_language_str_mv spa
topic Iconotextos
Historiografía
Arquitectura moderna
Historiofotía
Écfrasis
Iconotexts
Historiography
Modern architecture
Historiophoty
Ekphrasis
Investigación
Iconografía
Textos
Imágenes
Comunicación visual
Giedion, Sigfried
Zevi, Bruno
Benevolo, Leonardo
Arquitectura
spellingShingle Iconotextos
Historiografía
Arquitectura moderna
Historiofotía
Écfrasis
Iconotexts
Historiography
Modern architecture
Historiophoty
Ekphrasis
Investigación
Iconografía
Textos
Imágenes
Comunicación visual
Giedion, Sigfried
Zevi, Bruno
Benevolo, Leonardo
Arquitectura
Molinos, Rita
5431
topic_facet Iconotextos
Historiografía
Arquitectura moderna
Historiofotía
Écfrasis
Iconotexts
Historiography
Modern architecture
Historiophoty
Ekphrasis
Investigación
Iconografía
Textos
Imágenes
Comunicación visual
Giedion, Sigfried
Zevi, Bruno
Benevolo, Leonardo
Arquitectura
description This thesis can be understood, synthetically, as a development that: * studies the functions of printed images and the relationships between visual strategies and the historiographic script, in three books on the history of modern architecture, with original versions published in 1941, 1950 and 1960; successively reprinted and reissued. These are the works (cited respectively, according to those first editions): Sigfried Giedion, Space, Time and Architecture: The Growth of a New Tradition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), Bruno Zevi, Storia della Architettura Moderna (Turin: Enaudi) and Leonardo Benévolo, Storia della Architettura Moderna (Rome-Bari: Laterza); * observes the divergences between the three stories considering what has been raised by recent historiographical reviews regarding the differences between their authors and raises the problem of narrative differences at the level of the images is raised, as a new issue; * observes the images and graphic strategies as an alternative entryway for an intensive, denatured and disaggregated reading, where the visual contents can be indicative keys towards the interpretation of the three successive stories; * also understands that these books formed a set that stimulated the perception and diffusion of the doctrinal and the canonical and that resulted in a Modern Movement. In the duration of its biblio-historiographical construction, these differences were flattened, remaining unnoticed or forgettable for the reading public in the face of what -it was supposed- they coincided; * responds to a series of general questions raised from the recognition of the communicative importance of a profuse but not unlimited set of photographs, diagrams, tables and figures present in these successful products of disciplinary print culture. To what extent are their textual discourses or can they be understood exclusively independent of what the iconographic contribution implies? and What do these repertoires of images add?; How do they deviate -if they do- the meaning of the texts? And, from the historiographic order, it is posed what singular and successive distinctions do these illustrated stories offer, and how can they be understood as an accumulated set of the canonical aspects of the Modern Movement?; * It is assumed as an advance in the sense proposed by historiophoty, a subfield of narrative historiography, which combines narrative, history, image and medium in its subject matter. From this perspective, it proposes an observation of the functions of communication as units of the corpus and as an iconotextual genre for these stories, providing theoretical and methodological aspects applicable to future research.
author2 Gutman, Margarita
author_facet Gutman, Margarita
Molinos, Rita
format Tesis doctoral
Tesis doctoral
acceptedVersion
author Molinos, Rita
author_sort Molinos, Rita
title 5431
title_short 5431
title_full 5431
title_fullStr 5431
title_full_unstemmed 5431
title_sort 5431
publisher Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Arquitectura, Diseño y Urbanismo
publishDate 2016
url http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=aaqtesis&cl=CL1&d=HWA_5431
https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/aaqtesis/index/assoc/HWA_5431.dir/5431.PDF
work_keys_str_mv AT molinosrita 5431
AT molinosrita imagenesquecuentaniconotextosehistoriografiaparalaarquitecturamoderna
AT molinosrita imagesthatnarrateiconotextsandhistoriographyformodernarchitecture
_version_ 1809320067923443712
spelling I28-R145-HWA_54312024-08-16 5431 This thesis can be understood, synthetically, as a development that: * studies the functions of printed images and the relationships between visual strategies and the historiographic script, in three books on the history of modern architecture, with original versions published in 1941, 1950 and 1960; successively reprinted and reissued. These are the works (cited respectively, according to those first editions): Sigfried Giedion, Space, Time and Architecture: The Growth of a New Tradition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), Bruno Zevi, Storia della Architettura Moderna (Turin: Enaudi) and Leonardo Benévolo, Storia della Architettura Moderna (Rome-Bari: Laterza); * observes the divergences between the three stories considering what has been raised by recent historiographical reviews regarding the differences between their authors and raises the problem of narrative differences at the level of the images is raised, as a new issue; * observes the images and graphic strategies as an alternative entryway for an intensive, denatured and disaggregated reading, where the visual contents can be indicative keys towards the interpretation of the three successive stories; * also understands that these books formed a set that stimulated the perception and diffusion of the doctrinal and the canonical and that resulted in a Modern Movement. In the duration of its biblio-historiographical construction, these differences were flattened, remaining unnoticed or forgettable for the reading public in the face of what -it was supposed- they coincided; * responds to a series of general questions raised from the recognition of the communicative importance of a profuse but not unlimited set of photographs, diagrams, tables and figures present in these successful products of disciplinary print culture. To what extent are their textual discourses or can they be understood exclusively independent of what the iconographic contribution implies? and What do these repertoires of images add?; How do they deviate -if they do- the meaning of the texts? And, from the historiographic order, it is posed what singular and successive distinctions do these illustrated stories offer, and how can they be understood as an accumulated set of the canonical aspects of the Modern Movement?; * It is assumed as an advance in the sense proposed by historiophoty, a subfield of narrative historiography, which combines narrative, history, image and medium in its subject matter. From this perspective, it proposes an observation of the functions of communication as units of the corpus and as an iconotextual genre for these stories, providing theoretical and methodological aspects applicable to future research. Fil: Molinos, Rita Laura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Arquitectura, Diseño y Urbanismo. Buenos Aires, Argentina Gutman, Margarita Iglesia, Rafael Siglo XX Molinos, Rita 2016-08-12 Esta tesis se puede entender, sintéticamente, como un desarrollo que: * estudia las funciones de las imágenes impresas y las relaciones entre las estrategias visuales y el guion historiográfico, en tres libros de historia de la arquitectura moderna, con versiones originales editadas en 1941, 1950 y 1960; sucesivamente reimpresos y reeditados. Se trata de las obras (citadas respectivamente, según esas primeras ediciones): Sigfried Giedion, Space, Time and Architecture: The Growth of a New Tradition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), Bruno Zevi, Storia della Architettura Moderna (Turín: Enaudi) y Leonardo Benévolo, Storia della Architettura Moderna (Roma-Bari: Laterza); * atiende a las divergencias entre las tres historias considerando lo planteado por recientes revisiones historiográficas en cuanto a las diferencias entre sus autores y se plantea el problema de las diferencias de relato en el plano de las imágenes, asunto que no ha sido tratado; * observa las imágenes y estrategias gráficas como una vía de entrada alternativa para una lectura intensiva, desnaturalizada y desagregada, en donde los contenidos visuales pueden ser claves indiciales hacia la interpretación de las tres sucesivas historias; * entiende también que estos libros formaron un conjunto que estimuló la percepción y difusión de lo doctrinal y lo canónico y que dio como resultado un Movimiento Moderno. En la duración de su construcción biblio-historiográfica se aplanaron esas diferencias, quedando inadvertidas u olvidables para el público lector frente a aquello en lo que -se supuso- coincidían; * responde a una serie de interrogantes generales planteados a partir del reconocimiento de la importancia comunicativa de un profuso aunque no ilimitado conjunto de fotografías, diagramas, cuadros y figuras presentes en esos exitosos productos de la cultura impresa disciplinar. ¿Hasta qué punto sus discursos textuales son o pueden ser entendidos exclusivamente independientes de lo que supone el aporte iconográfico? y ¿qué agregan estos repertorios de imágenes; en qué desvían -si es que lo hacen- el sentido de los textos? En definitiva, desde el orden historiográfico, se plantea ¿qué distinciones singulares y sucesivas ofrecen estas historias ilustradas, y cómo pueden ser entendidas como conjunto acumulado de los aspectos canónicos del Movimiento Moderno?; * se asume como un avance en el sentido propuesto por la historiofotía, subcampo de la historiografía narrativista, que conjuga en su temática, narración, historia, imagen y medio. Plantea, dentro de esa perspectiva, una observación de las funciones de la comunicación en tanto unidades del corpus y en tanto género iconotextual para estas historias, aportando aspectos teóricos y metodológicos aplicables a futuras investigaciones. application/pdf Aliata, Fernando Maestripieri, Eduardo Wolkowicz, Daniel Iconotextos Historiografía Arquitectura moderna Historiofotía Écfrasis Iconotexts Historiography Modern architecture Historiophoty Ekphrasis spa Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Arquitectura, Diseño y Urbanismo info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ Investigación Iconografía Textos Imágenes Comunicación visual Giedion, Sigfried Zevi, Bruno Benevolo, Leonardo Arquitectura Imágenes que cuentan : iconotextos e historiografía para la arquitectura moderna Images that narrate : iconotexts and historiography for modern architecture info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis info:ar-repo/semantics/tesis doctoral info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=aaqtesis&cl=CL1&d=HWA_5431 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/aaqtesis/index/assoc/HWA_5431.dir/5431.PDF