InVet. 2018, 20 (1-2): 249-256 Riesgos ocupacionales ISSN 1514-6634...

The aims of this study were to estimate the frequency of accidents and zoonoses, the use of personal protective equipment and its associated factors in bovine and equine practitioners. A crosssectional study was carried out by means of personal interviews with a structured questionnaire in Mendoza,...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Navarrete, M.B., Tarabla, H.D.
Formato: Artículo publishedVersion
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pveterinaria/invet&cl=CL1&d=HWA_3638
https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pveterinaria/invet/index/assoc/HWA_3638.dir/3638.PDF
Aporte de:
id I28-R145-HWA_3638
record_format dspace
spelling I28-R145-HWA_36382024-11-05 InVet. 2018, 20 (1-2): 249-256 Riesgos ocupacionales ISSN 1514-6634... The aims of this study were to estimate the frequency of accidents and zoonoses, the use of personal protective equipment and its associated factors in bovine and equine practitioners. A crosssectional study was carried out by means of personal interviews with a structured questionnaire in Mendoza, Argentina. Practitioners were selected by simple random sampling (n= 78). Statistical analysis included Pearson correlation coefficient, Student´s t test, analyses of variance and Fisher exact test. The majority of practitioners (98.7%) had suffered occupational accidents, being the most frequent physical exertion and contact with sharp objects. Lesion type and location were not associated with practitione ´s sex, age nor animal species. Many (51.3%) had worked while injured and 74.4% self-medicated. Zoonoses affected 11.5% of interviewees. Gloves were the most frequent element used for protection. Age was lower among practitioners who always wore protective elements in medical activitiesthan among practitioners who wore them sometimes or never. The opposite were found in relation to protective elements in non-specific activities (P< 0.05). The remaining factors were no significantly associated. Veterinarians? occupational safety could be improved by enhancing awareness on new generations of professionals. Fil: Navarrete, M.B. Universidad Juan Agustín Maza. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Ambientales. Mendoza, Argentina Fil: Tarabla, H.D. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Santa Fe, Argentina Navarrete, M.B. Tarabla, H.D. 2018 Los objetivos de este trabajo fueron estimar la frecuencia de accidentes laborales y zoonosis, el uso de elementos de protección personal y sus factores asociados en veterinarios de bovinos y equinos. Se efectuó un estudio transversal mediante entrevistas personales con cuestionario estructurado en Mendoza, Argentina. El diseño fue aleatorio simple y el tamaño muestral n=78. El análisis estadístico incluyó correlación de Pearson, t de Student, análisis de la varianza y test exacto de Fisher. El 98,7% tuvo accidentes laborales, siendo los más frecuentes esfuerzo físico excesivo y contacto con objetos corto-punzantes. El tipo y la localización de las lesiones no estuvieron asociados a la especie animal de práctica profesional, el sexo o la edad de los entrevistados. El 51,3% trabajó en inferioridad de condiciones físicas y el 74,4% se auto-medicó. El 11,5% padeció alguna zoonosis. Los guantes fueron los elementos de protección más utilizados. La edad fue menor entre quienes siempre utilizaban elementos de protección en actividades médicas y mayor entre quienes siempre se protegían en actividades no específicas de la profesión (P< 0,05). Los restantes factores no estuvieron significativamente asociados. La seguridad ocupacional de los veterinarios podría mejorar través de la concientización de las nuevas generaciones de profesionales. application/pdf 1514-6634 (impreso) 1668-3498 (en línea) Riesgos laborales Veterinarios Protección personal Occupational risks Veterinarians Personal safety spa Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ InVet, vol. 20, nº2 Factores asociados a los riesgos ocupacionales y el uso de elementos de protección personal en la práctica veterinaria con bovinos y equinos info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pveterinaria/invet&cl=CL1&d=HWA_3638 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pveterinaria/invet/index/assoc/HWA_3638.dir/3638.PDF
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-145
collection Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)
language Español
orig_language_str_mv spa
topic Riesgos laborales
Veterinarios
Protección personal
Occupational risks
Veterinarians
Personal safety
spellingShingle Riesgos laborales
Veterinarios
Protección personal
Occupational risks
Veterinarians
Personal safety
Navarrete, M.B.
Tarabla, H.D.
InVet. 2018, 20 (1-2): 249-256 Riesgos ocupacionales ISSN 1514-6634...
topic_facet Riesgos laborales
Veterinarios
Protección personal
Occupational risks
Veterinarians
Personal safety
description The aims of this study were to estimate the frequency of accidents and zoonoses, the use of personal protective equipment and its associated factors in bovine and equine practitioners. A crosssectional study was carried out by means of personal interviews with a structured questionnaire in Mendoza, Argentina. Practitioners were selected by simple random sampling (n= 78). Statistical analysis included Pearson correlation coefficient, Student´s t test, analyses of variance and Fisher exact test. The majority of practitioners (98.7%) had suffered occupational accidents, being the most frequent physical exertion and contact with sharp objects. Lesion type and location were not associated with practitione ´s sex, age nor animal species. Many (51.3%) had worked while injured and 74.4% self-medicated. Zoonoses affected 11.5% of interviewees. Gloves were the most frequent element used for protection. Age was lower among practitioners who always wore protective elements in medical activitiesthan among practitioners who wore them sometimes or never. The opposite were found in relation to protective elements in non-specific activities (P< 0.05). The remaining factors were no significantly associated. Veterinarians? occupational safety could be improved by enhancing awareness on new generations of professionals.
format Artículo
Artículo
publishedVersion
author Navarrete, M.B.
Tarabla, H.D.
author_facet Navarrete, M.B.
Tarabla, H.D.
author_sort Navarrete, M.B.
title InVet. 2018, 20 (1-2): 249-256 Riesgos ocupacionales ISSN 1514-6634...
title_short InVet. 2018, 20 (1-2): 249-256 Riesgos ocupacionales ISSN 1514-6634...
title_full InVet. 2018, 20 (1-2): 249-256 Riesgos ocupacionales ISSN 1514-6634...
title_fullStr InVet. 2018, 20 (1-2): 249-256 Riesgos ocupacionales ISSN 1514-6634...
title_full_unstemmed InVet. 2018, 20 (1-2): 249-256 Riesgos ocupacionales ISSN 1514-6634...
title_sort invet. 2018, 20 (1-2): 249-256 riesgos ocupacionales issn 1514-6634...
publisher Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias.
publishDate 2018
url http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pveterinaria/invet&cl=CL1&d=HWA_3638
https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pveterinaria/invet/index/assoc/HWA_3638.dir/3638.PDF
work_keys_str_mv AT navarretemb invet20182012249256riesgosocupacionalesissn15146634
AT tarablahd invet20182012249256riesgosocupacionalesissn15146634
AT navarretemb factoresasociadosalosriesgosocupacionalesyelusodeelementosdeproteccionpersonalenlapracticaveterinariaconbovinosyequinos
AT tarablahd factoresasociadosalosriesgosocupacionalesyelusodeelementosdeproteccionpersonalenlapracticaveterinariaconbovinosyequinos
_version_ 1824359791899705344