Sobre la relación entre teoría y la práctica en los contenidos de teoría general del derecho

This paper pose a critical analysis of the theoretical framework deployed by mainstream General Theory of Law curriculums and its shortcomings on explaining relevant areas of the legal practice. Specially, a comparative analysis between positivist and postpositivist models is attempted in order to s...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Aldao, Martín M.
Formato: Artículo publishedVersion
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones 2014
Materias:
Teoria general del derecho
Argumentacion constitucional
Racionalidad
Estado de derecho
Democracia
Enseñanza del derecho
Universidades
Planificacion de la educacion
Estudiantes de derecho
Filosofia del derecho
General theory of law
Constitutional argumentation
Rationality
Constitutional State
Democracy
Law students
Philosophy of law
Universities
Educational planning
Acceso en línea:http://revistas.derecho.uba.ar/index.php/academia/article/view/547/482
http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=academia&cl=CL1&d=HWA_3353
https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/academia/index/assoc/HWA_3353.dir/3353.PDF
Aporte de:
Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) de Universidad de Buenos Aires
Descripción
Sumario:This paper pose a critical analysis of the theoretical framework deployed by mainstream General Theory of Law curriculums and its shortcomings on explaining relevant areas of the legal practice. Specially, a comparative analysis between positivist and postpositivist models is attempted in order to show the better performance of the latter where constitutional matters are involved.

Ejemplares similares