3021

Mostrar todas las versiones(2)

The constitutional reform of 1994 has definitely been an improvement in relation to the previous Constitution of 1853. However, it represents an example of a lost opportunity and, after 20 years of its passing, it is important to point out its deficits and flaws. In the 80's there was a clear a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Gargarella, Roberto
Formato:	Artículo publishedVersion
Lenguaje:	Español
Publicado:	Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones 2014
Materias:	Reforma constitucional Derechos humanos Derecho constitucional Tribunales internacionales Constitución Análisis jurídico
Acceso en línea:	http://www.derecho.uba.ar/publicaciones/pensar-en-derecho/revistas/5/un-breve-balance-de-la-reforma-constitucional-de-1994-20-anos-despues.pdf http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pensar&cl=CL1&d=HWA_3021 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pensar/index/assoc/HWA_3021.dir/3021.PDF
Aporte de:	Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) de Universidad de Buenos Aires

id	I28-R145-HWA_3021
record_format	dspace
spelling	I28-R145-HWA_30212024-08-19 3021 The constitutional reform of 1994 has definitely been an improvement in relation to the previous Constitution of 1853. However, it represents an example of a lost opportunity and, after 20 years of its passing, it is important to point out its deficits and flaws. In the 80's there was a clear academic and political consensus on the importance of solving the democratic instability that affected Latin America. A bad constitutional design that emphasizes the hyper-presidentialism was seen, to a large extent, as the responsible of the political crisis. The Constitution of 1994 maintained an organization of power centered in the Executive. The reform was characterized by its accumulative tendency, instead of being synthetic, which is reflected in a great incorporation of "new rights" in matters of human rights. The energies were put in the increase of the list of rights when, at the same time, another important part of the Constitution was neglected: the one of the organization of power. The incorporation of organisms and institutions such as the Council of Magistracy or the Chief of Staff had changed the institutional system but were not useful for a democratization of power. Moreover, the "accumulative" solutions implied problems in its effectiveness, as certain new rights entered in tension with old ones Fil: Gargarella, Gregorio. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Cátedra Derecho Constitucional. Buenos Aires, Argentina Argentina Gargarella, Roberto 2014 La reforma de 1994 implicó, definitivamente, una mejora en relación a la anterior Constitución de 1853. Sin embargo, representa un ejemplo de una oportunidad perdida y, tras 20 años de su sanción, resulta relevante señalar sus déficits y defectos. En los años 80 existía un claro consenso académico y político en torno a la importancia de resolver la inestabilidad democrática que afectaba a toda América Latina. Un mal diseño constitucional que acentuaba el hiperpresidencialismo era entendido como en gran medida responsable de la crisis política. La Constitución de 1994 mantuvo una organización de poder centrada en el Ejecutivo. La reforma se caracterizó por su tendencia acumulativa, en vez de sintética, lo que se ve reflejado en la amplia incorporación de "nuevos derechos" en materia de derechos humanos. Las energías estuvieron puestas en la ampliación del listado de derechos existentes cuando, al mismo tiempo, se descuidó otra sección muy importante de la Constitución: la organización del poder. La incorporación de organismos e instituciones como el Consejo de la Magistratura o el Jefe de Gabinete cambiaron el sistema institucional pero no han servido para democratizar el poder. Por otro lado, las soluciones "acumulativas" derivaron en problemas en su efectivización, en la medida en que ciertos nuevos derechos e instituciones entran en tensión con otros ya existentes. application/pdf 2314-0186 (impreso) 2314-0194 (en l?nea) http://www.derecho.uba.ar/publicaciones/pensar-en-derecho/revistas/5/un-breve-balance-de-la-reforma-constitucional-de-1994-20-anos-despues.pdf Reforma constitucional Derechos humanos Derecho constitucional Tribunales internacionales Constitución Análisis jurídico spa Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ Pensar en Derecho, a. 3, no. 05 Un breve balance de la reforma constitucional de 1994, 20 años después info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pensar&cl=CL1&d=HWA_3021 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pensar/index/assoc/HWA_3021.dir/3021.PDF
institution	Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str	I-28
repository_str	R-145
collection	Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)
language	Español
orig_language_str_mv	spa
topic	Reforma constitucional Derechos humanos Derecho constitucional Tribunales internacionales Constitución Análisis jurídico
spellingShingle	Reforma constitucional Derechos humanos Derecho constitucional Tribunales internacionales Constitución Análisis jurídico Gargarella, Roberto 3021
topic_facet	Reforma constitucional Derechos humanos Derecho constitucional Tribunales internacionales Constitución Análisis jurídico
description	The constitutional reform of 1994 has definitely been an improvement in relation to the previous Constitution of 1853. However, it represents an example of a lost opportunity and, after 20 years of its passing, it is important to point out its deficits and flaws. In the 80's there was a clear academic and political consensus on the importance of solving the democratic instability that affected Latin America. A bad constitutional design that emphasizes the hyper-presidentialism was seen, to a large extent, as the responsible of the political crisis. The Constitution of 1994 maintained an organization of power centered in the Executive. The reform was characterized by its accumulative tendency, instead of being synthetic, which is reflected in a great incorporation of "new rights" in matters of human rights. The energies were put in the increase of the list of rights when, at the same time, another important part of the Constitution was neglected: the one of the organization of power. The incorporation of organisms and institutions such as the Council of Magistracy or the Chief of Staff had changed the institutional system but were not useful for a democratization of power. Moreover, the "accumulative" solutions implied problems in its effectiveness, as certain new rights entered in tension with old ones
format	Artículo Artículo publishedVersion
author	Gargarella, Roberto
author_facet	Gargarella, Roberto
author_sort	Gargarella, Roberto
title	3021
title_short	3021
title_full	3021
title_fullStr	3021
title_full_unstemmed	3021
title_sort	3021
publisher	Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones
publishDate	2014
url	http://www.derecho.uba.ar/publicaciones/pensar-en-derecho/revistas/5/un-breve-balance-de-la-reforma-constitucional-de-1994-20-anos-despues.pdf http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pensar&cl=CL1&d=HWA_3021 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pensar/index/assoc/HWA_3021.dir/3021.PDF
work_keys_str_mv	AT gargarellaroberto 3021 AT gargarellaroberto unbrevebalancedelareformaconstitucionalde199420anosdespues
_version_	1809356313563496448

3021

Ejemplares similares