2931
This paper aims to analyze the Argentinian Supreme Court response to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights case "Fontevecchia". On the one hand, it postulates that the arguments of the Supreme Court are opposed to the political purpose of the 1994 National Convention that had assigned c...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones
2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.derecho.uba.ar/publicaciones/pensar-en-derecho/revistas/10/las-ataduras-de-ulises-se-aflojan.pdf http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pensar&cl=CL1&d=HWA_2931 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pensar/index/assoc/HWA_2931.dir/2931.PDF |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | This paper aims to analyze the Argentinian Supreme Court response to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights case "Fontevecchia". On the one hand, it postulates that the arguments of the Supreme Court are opposed to the political purpose of the 1994 National Convention that had assigned constitutional level to certain international treaties on human rights in attention to the deficits in our constitutional tradition which included institutional ruptures and brutal violations against human rights. The text represented this strategy with the allegory of Ulysses used in the Constitutional Theory in order to describe the relations between democracy and the Constitution. On the other hand, and from a legal perspective, it reconstructs the reasoning of the Argentine Supreme Court to highlight its failures. Last but not least, it discusses the use of the argument of the fourth instance formula, the subsidiarity of the Inter-American System, the lack of remedial powers of the Inter-American Court and the public principles of article 27 of the Argentinian Constitution. |
|---|