La CSJN y el empleo de la Convención de Viena sobre el Derecho de los Tratados en el caso Fontevecchia : falencias en la interpretación y retrocesos en materia de derechos humanos
In Fontevecchia, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights ordered the Argentine State to set aside a civil sentence, as a measure of reparation. The Supreme Court of Justice of Argentina did not comply, arguing that the inter-American tribunal lacks jurisdiction to establish such a remedy. This comm...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones
2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.derecho.uba.ar/publicaciones/lye/revistas/98/la-csjn-y-el-empleo-de-la-convencion-de-viena.pdf http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pderecho/lecciones&cl=CL1&d=HWA_2703 http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pderecho/lecciones/index/assoc/HWA_2703.dir/2703.PDF |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | In Fontevecchia, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights ordered the Argentine State to set aside a civil sentence, as a measure of reparation. The Supreme Court of Justice of Argentina did not comply, arguing that the inter-American tribunal lacks jurisdiction to establish such a remedy. This commentary analyses how the Supreme Court employs the rules on interpretation of international treaties of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Numerous problems are identified within the Supreme Court's argumentation, as well as a clear shift with regards to the position adopted in previous cases |
|---|