Consideraciones sobre las tensiones de la ciudadanía moderna
The increase in the appreciation of the concept of citizenship in the 80?s has sparked a series of controversies. An example of this can be found in the tensions among the different components of citizenship. Social rights, as opposed to political and civil rights, require the presence of a strong S...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones
2009
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.derecho.uba.ar/publicaciones/lye/revistas/86/05-ensayo-ferro.pdf http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=revis&cl=CL1&d=HWA_1203 http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pderecho/lecciones/index/assoc/HWA_1203.dir/1203.PDF |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The increase in the appreciation of the concept of citizenship in the 80?s has sparked a series of controversies. An example of this can be found in the tensions among the different components of citizenship. Social rights, as opposed to political and civil rights, require the presence of a strong State --- a view conflicting with liberal opinions advocating a minimum State. Another axis of the discussion is presented with the criticism to Marshall's classic essay of 1949, where the author proposes a differential status between specific rights of citizenship with respect to man's generic rights. That proposal leads to the need of an universal citizenship, which would not be related to pertaining to a given community. This work analyzes the fundamentals of citizenship as a legitimizing framework of bourgeois Rule of Law. A brief series of classical authors are selected to identify some dilemmas in liberal-type modern citizenship |
|---|