La interpretación plotiniana del carácter artificialista de la generación demiúrgica en el Timeo
In the present work I will analyze the first chapter of Enneads III 9 (13) and the three first chapters of III 2 (47) in which Plotinus refers to Plato’s Timaeus –implicitly or explicitly– in order to identify his second Hypostasis with the Demiurge. The study deals not only with the contact points...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires
2013
|
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/CdF/article/view/957 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=cufilo&d=957_oai |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | In the present work I will analyze the first chapter of Enneads III 9 (13) and the three first chapters of III 2 (47) in which Plotinus refers to Plato’s Timaeus –implicitly or explicitly– in order to identify his second Hypostasis with the Demiurge. The study deals not only with the contact points that can be established between the two notions but fundamentally it aims to specify those contrasts that traditionally are thought to be present in both figures. I will try to demonstrate that those differences do not necessary imply Plotinus is distancing from Plato, but that they express the plotinian philosophical practice and his exegetic method. |
|---|