"Scholastic" as a Category of Philosophy's Historiography

The paper deals with some definitions of scholasticism which can be found in works from the philosophical historiography of our century. Firstly, definitions put forward by Maurice De Wulf (1857-1947) and Martin Grabmann (1875-1949) are discussed. The first of these historians identifies “scholastic...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Quinto, Riccardo
Formato: Artículo publishedVersion
Lenguaje:Italiano
Publicado: Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires 1998
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/7899
https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=patris&d=7899_oai
Aporte de:
id I28-R145-7899_oai
record_format dspace
spelling I28-R145-7899_oai2025-11-17 Quinto, Riccardo 1998-11-02 The paper deals with some definitions of scholasticism which can be found in works from the philosophical historiography of our century. Firstly, definitions put forward by Maurice De Wulf (1857-1947) and Martin Grabmann (1875-1949) are discussed. The first of these historians identifies “scholasticism” with one particular philosophy (i.e. an articulated series of doctrines) which, he claims, have existed in the Middle Ages and somehow anticipate of scholasticism with the educational background of medieval scholars; Grabmann, on the other hand, ends by considering scholasticism simply as a theology, if not “the” (only possible) form of theology, and his definition is of no use in the field of the history of philosophy. In the second part, the definitions put forward more recently by Lambert M. De Rijk and George Wieland are considered. These definitions start from the relationship between “auctoritas” and “ratio” and focus on giving a concrete content both to the idea of “authority” (i.e. a set of authoritative texts, different for each faculty) and to “reason”, which must be understood as the particular set of tools of dialectic, as they developed throughout the Middle Ages. Wieland adds to this a series of characteristics of scholasticism, such as the commitment to a topic as a scientific topic, the fact that each discipline is penetrated by philosophy, and the separation between “school” and “life”. The simultaneous appearance of all these characteristics in the 12th century marks the beginning of scholasticism, and can also explain its “dissolution” at the end of the Middle Ages. Este trabajo trata algunas definiones de escolástica que pueden encontrarse en los trabajos de la historiografía filosófica de nuestro siglo. En primer término, se discuten las definiones dadas por Maurice De Wulf (1857-1947) y Martín Grabmann (1875-1949). El primero de estos historiadores identifica al “escolasticismo” con una filosofía particular (esto es, con una serie articulada de doctrinas) que, establece, existieron en la Edad Media y que, de cierta manera, anticipan la escolástica con el trasfondo educacional de los estudiosos medievales. Por su parte, Grabmann termina sosteniendo que la escolástica fue simplemente una teología, si no “la” (única posible) forma de teología, y su definiton no es de ningún uso en el campo de la historia de la filosofía. En segundo término, se consideran las definiciones dadas recientemente por Lambert M. De Rijk y George Wieland. Estas definiciones comienzan desde la relación entre “auctoritas” y “ratio” y se enfocan en dar un contenido concreto tanto de la idea de “autoridad” (un conjunto de textos autoritarios, distintos para cada facultad) como de “razón”, que debe entenderse como un conjunto particular de herramientas dialécticas, tal como se desarrollaron durante la Edad Media. Wieland agrega a esto una serie de características de la escolástica, tal como el compromiso con un tema como un tema científico, el hecho de que cada disciplina se encuentra penetrada por la filosofía y la separación entre “escuela” y “vida”. La aparición simultánea de todas estas características en el siglo XII marca el comienzo de la escolastica y, por ello, también explica su “disolución” al final de la Edad Media. application/pdf https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/7899 ita Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/7899/6958 Patristica et Mediævalia; Vol. 19 (1998); 51-64 2683-9636 Edad Media Historiografía Escolástica Siglo XII Ciencia Middle Ages Historiography Scholasticism 12th Century Science "Scholastic" as a Category of Philosophy's Historiography “Scolastica” come categoria della storiografia filosofica info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=patris&d=7899_oai
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-145
collection Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)
language Italiano
orig_language_str_mv ita
topic Edad Media
Historiografía
Escolástica
Siglo XII
Ciencia
Middle Ages
Historiography
Scholasticism
12th Century
Science
spellingShingle Edad Media
Historiografía
Escolástica
Siglo XII
Ciencia
Middle Ages
Historiography
Scholasticism
12th Century
Science
Quinto, Riccardo
"Scholastic" as a Category of Philosophy's Historiography
topic_facet Edad Media
Historiografía
Escolástica
Siglo XII
Ciencia
Middle Ages
Historiography
Scholasticism
12th Century
Science
description The paper deals with some definitions of scholasticism which can be found in works from the philosophical historiography of our century. Firstly, definitions put forward by Maurice De Wulf (1857-1947) and Martin Grabmann (1875-1949) are discussed. The first of these historians identifies “scholasticism” with one particular philosophy (i.e. an articulated series of doctrines) which, he claims, have existed in the Middle Ages and somehow anticipate of scholasticism with the educational background of medieval scholars; Grabmann, on the other hand, ends by considering scholasticism simply as a theology, if not “the” (only possible) form of theology, and his definition is of no use in the field of the history of philosophy. In the second part, the definitions put forward more recently by Lambert M. De Rijk and George Wieland are considered. These definitions start from the relationship between “auctoritas” and “ratio” and focus on giving a concrete content both to the idea of “authority” (i.e. a set of authoritative texts, different for each faculty) and to “reason”, which must be understood as the particular set of tools of dialectic, as they developed throughout the Middle Ages. Wieland adds to this a series of characteristics of scholasticism, such as the commitment to a topic as a scientific topic, the fact that each discipline is penetrated by philosophy, and the separation between “school” and “life”. The simultaneous appearance of all these characteristics in the 12th century marks the beginning of scholasticism, and can also explain its “dissolution” at the end of the Middle Ages.
format Artículo
publishedVersion
author Quinto, Riccardo
author_facet Quinto, Riccardo
author_sort Quinto, Riccardo
title "Scholastic" as a Category of Philosophy's Historiography
title_short "Scholastic" as a Category of Philosophy's Historiography
title_full "Scholastic" as a Category of Philosophy's Historiography
title_fullStr "Scholastic" as a Category of Philosophy's Historiography
title_full_unstemmed "Scholastic" as a Category of Philosophy's Historiography
title_sort "scholastic" as a category of philosophy's historiography
publisher Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires
publishDate 1998
url https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/7899
https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=patris&d=7899_oai
work_keys_str_mv AT quintoriccardo scholasticasacategoryofphilosophyshistoriography
AT quintoriccardo scolasticacomecategoriadellastoriografiafilosofica
_version_ 1851375399555039232