Being as Event. On Some Prerequisites for the Proof of God in Anselm of Canterbury

Mostrar todas las versiones(4)

ln recent discussions on Anselm’s ontological argument, it is made the assumption that Anselm holds “existence” to be a first order predicate. However, there is no explicit statement in Anselm’s texts that confirms this interpretation. In Thomas Aquinas and his predecessors, the logic of subject and...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Schnepf, Robert
Formato: Artículo publishedVersion
Lenguaje:deu
Publicado: Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires 1998
Materias:
Anselmo
Argumento ontológico
Existencia
Lógica
Evento
Anselm
Ontological argument
Existence
Logic
Event
Acceso en línea:https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/7897
https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=patris&d=7897_oai
Aporte de:
Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) de Universidad de Buenos Aires
id I28-R145-7897_oai
record_format dspace
spelling I28-R145-7897_oai2025-11-17 Schnepf, Robert 1998-11-02 ln recent discussions on Anselm’s ontological argument, it is made the assumption that Anselm holds “existence” to be a first order predicate. However, there is no explicit statement in Anselm’s texts that confirms this interpretation. In Thomas Aquinas and his predecessors, the logic of subject and predicate is applied on Anselm’s argument. Anselm himself has no logic of “existence”. The exact meaning and function of the expression “existence” is therefore to be investigated by an interpretation of its actual use in the argument itself. I propose that Anselm views existence to be an event, and that the term "maius" can best be interpreted as a relation between different kinds of events. En discusiones recientes respecto al argumento ontológico de Anselmo se asume que Anselmo toma a “existencia” como un predicado de primer orden. Sin embargo, no hay ninguna frase explícita en los textos anselmianos que confirme esta interpretación. Tanto en Tomás de Aquino como en sus predecesores la lógica de sujeto y predicado se aplica al argumento de Anselmo. Pero Anselmo mismo no presenta lógica alguna de “existencia”. Por tanto, el significado y función exactos de la expresión “existencia” debe investigarse a través de una interpretación de su uso efectivo en el argumento mismo. Propongo que Anselmo entiende a la existencia como un evento y que el término “maius” puede interpretarse de mejor manera como una relación entre diferentes tipos de eventos. application/pdf https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/7897 deu Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/7897/6956 Patristica et Mediævalia; Vol. 19 (1998); 3-22 2683-9636 Anselmo Argumento ontológico Existencia Lógica Evento Anselm Ontological argument Existence Logic Event Being as Event. On Some Prerequisites for the Proof of God in Anselm of Canterbury Sein als Ereignis. Zu einigen Voraussetzungen des Gottesbeweises bei Anselm von Canterbury info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=patris&d=7897_oai
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-145
collection Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)
language deu
orig_language_str_mv deu
topic Anselmo
Argumento ontológico
Existencia
Lógica
Evento
Anselm
Ontological argument
Existence
Logic
Event
spellingShingle Anselmo
Argumento ontológico
Existencia
Lógica
Evento
Anselm
Ontological argument
Existence
Logic
Event
Schnepf, Robert
Being as Event. On Some Prerequisites for the Proof of God in Anselm of Canterbury
topic_facet Anselmo
Argumento ontológico
Existencia
Lógica
Evento
Anselm
Ontological argument
Existence
Logic
Event
description ln recent discussions on Anselm’s ontological argument, it is made the assumption that Anselm holds “existence” to be a first order predicate. However, there is no explicit statement in Anselm’s texts that confirms this interpretation. In Thomas Aquinas and his predecessors, the logic of subject and predicate is applied on Anselm’s argument. Anselm himself has no logic of “existence”. The exact meaning and function of the expression “existence” is therefore to be investigated by an interpretation of its actual use in the argument itself. I propose that Anselm views existence to be an event, and that the term "maius" can best be interpreted as a relation between different kinds of events.
format Artículo
publishedVersion
author Schnepf, Robert
author_facet Schnepf, Robert
author_sort Schnepf, Robert
title Being as Event. On Some Prerequisites for the Proof of God in Anselm of Canterbury
title_short Being as Event. On Some Prerequisites for the Proof of God in Anselm of Canterbury
title_full Being as Event. On Some Prerequisites for the Proof of God in Anselm of Canterbury
title_fullStr Being as Event. On Some Prerequisites for the Proof of God in Anselm of Canterbury
title_full_unstemmed Being as Event. On Some Prerequisites for the Proof of God in Anselm of Canterbury
title_sort being as event. on some prerequisites for the proof of god in anselm of canterbury
publisher Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires
publishDate 1998
url https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/7897
https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=patris&d=7897_oai
work_keys_str_mv AT schnepfrobert beingaseventonsomeprerequisitesfortheproofofgodinanselmofcanterbury
AT schnepfrobert seinalsereigniszueinigenvoraussetzungendesgottesbeweisesbeianselmvoncanterbury
_version_ 1851375425989640192

Ejemplares similares