The Quaestio disputata de felicitate of Master Giacomo of Pistoia. Notes for a New Discussion Regarding His Sources

This paper aims at showing the influence of the wrong application of the expression "latin averroism" in a particular case: the Quaestio disputata de felicitate of the italian master Giacomo of Pistoia. In order to do so, we propose (1) a new discussion over Giacomo of Pistoia's sourc...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Cervera, Violeta
Formato: Artículo publishedVersion
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/7786
https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=patris&d=7786_oai
Aporte de:
id I28-R145-7786_oai
record_format dspace
spelling I28-R145-7786_oai2025-11-17 Cervera, Violeta 2011-06-06 This paper aims at showing the influence of the wrong application of the expression "latin averroism" in a particular case: the Quaestio disputata de felicitate of the italian master Giacomo of Pistoia. In order to do so, we propose (1) a new discussion over Giacomo of Pistoia's sources, which will allow to deepen a topic previously suggested by Kristeller: the possible influence of Thomas Aquinas in the Quaestio disputata de felicitate and (2) a reconsideration of the relation between the De summo bono by Boecio of Dacia and the Quaestio disputata de felicitate by Giacomo of Pistoia. It is shown, in the conclusions, the inconvenience of establishing, over such texts, rigid historiographical classifications that do not contribute to a detailed study of the sources. Este trabajo busca mostrar la influencia de la aplicación errónea de la expresión “averroísmo latino” en el siguiente caso particular: la Quaestio disputata de felicitate del maestro italiano Jacobo de Pistoia. Para ello, proponemos (1) una nueva discusión sobre las fuentes de Jacobo, que nos permitirá profundizar un tópico previamente sugerido por Kristeller: la posible influencia de Tomás de Aquino en la Quaestio disputata de felicitate y (2) una reconsideración de la relación entre el De summo bono de Boecio de Dacia y esta Quaestio de Jacobo de Pistoia. Así, en la conclusión se plantea el inconveniente que significa establecer sobre estos textos rígidas clasificaciones historiográficos que no conribuyen a un estudio detallado de las fuentes. application/pdf https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/7786 spa Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/7786/6853 Patristica et Mediævalia; Vol. 32 (2011); 99-110 2683-9636 Averroísmo latino historiografía recepción Jacobo de Pistoia Tomás de Aquino Latin averroism Historiography reception Giacomo of Pistoia Thomas Aquinas The Quaestio disputata de felicitate of Master Giacomo of Pistoia. Notes for a New Discussion Regarding His Sources La Quaestio disputata de felicitate del maestro Jacobo de Pistoia. Apuntes para una nueva discusión acerca de sus fuentes info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=patris&d=7786_oai
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-145
collection Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)
language Español
orig_language_str_mv spa
topic Averroísmo latino
historiografía
recepción
Jacobo de Pistoia
Tomás de Aquino
Latin averroism
Historiography
reception
Giacomo of Pistoia
Thomas Aquinas
spellingShingle Averroísmo latino
historiografía
recepción
Jacobo de Pistoia
Tomás de Aquino
Latin averroism
Historiography
reception
Giacomo of Pistoia
Thomas Aquinas
Cervera, Violeta
The Quaestio disputata de felicitate of Master Giacomo of Pistoia. Notes for a New Discussion Regarding His Sources
topic_facet Averroísmo latino
historiografía
recepción
Jacobo de Pistoia
Tomás de Aquino
Latin averroism
Historiography
reception
Giacomo of Pistoia
Thomas Aquinas
description This paper aims at showing the influence of the wrong application of the expression "latin averroism" in a particular case: the Quaestio disputata de felicitate of the italian master Giacomo of Pistoia. In order to do so, we propose (1) a new discussion over Giacomo of Pistoia's sources, which will allow to deepen a topic previously suggested by Kristeller: the possible influence of Thomas Aquinas in the Quaestio disputata de felicitate and (2) a reconsideration of the relation between the De summo bono by Boecio of Dacia and the Quaestio disputata de felicitate by Giacomo of Pistoia. It is shown, in the conclusions, the inconvenience of establishing, over such texts, rigid historiographical classifications that do not contribute to a detailed study of the sources.
format Artículo
publishedVersion
author Cervera, Violeta
author_facet Cervera, Violeta
author_sort Cervera, Violeta
title The Quaestio disputata de felicitate of Master Giacomo of Pistoia. Notes for a New Discussion Regarding His Sources
title_short The Quaestio disputata de felicitate of Master Giacomo of Pistoia. Notes for a New Discussion Regarding His Sources
title_full The Quaestio disputata de felicitate of Master Giacomo of Pistoia. Notes for a New Discussion Regarding His Sources
title_fullStr The Quaestio disputata de felicitate of Master Giacomo of Pistoia. Notes for a New Discussion Regarding His Sources
title_full_unstemmed The Quaestio disputata de felicitate of Master Giacomo of Pistoia. Notes for a New Discussion Regarding His Sources
title_sort quaestio disputata de felicitate of master giacomo of pistoia. notes for a new discussion regarding his sources
publisher Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires
publishDate 2011
url https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/7786
https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=patris&d=7786_oai
work_keys_str_mv AT cerveravioleta thequaestiodisputatadefelicitateofmastergiacomoofpistoianotesforanewdiscussionregardinghissources
AT cerveravioleta laquaestiodisputatadefelicitatedelmaestrojacobodepistoiaapuntesparaunanuevadiscusionacercadesusfuentes
AT cerveravioleta quaestiodisputatadefelicitateofmastergiacomoofpistoianotesforanewdiscussionregardinghissources
_version_ 1851375451997470720