Division, object and abstraction of speculative sciences according to Francisco Suárez
During the last decades of the twentieth century, Francisco Suárez’s philosophy was part of a scholastic movement commonly referred to as Thomistic School. The approach perspective, as it is commonly known, placed the speculative position of Suarez closer to the one of the Dominican St. Tho...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/7310 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=patris&d=7310_oai |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I28-R145-7310_oai |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
I28-R145-7310_oai2025-11-17 Mendoza, José María Felipe 2019-10-01 During the last decades of the twentieth century, Francisco Suárez’s philosophy was part of a scholastic movement commonly referred to as Thomistic School. The approach perspective, as it is commonly known, placed the speculative position of Suarez closer to the one of the Dominican St. Thomas Aquinas, according to the following nuances: a. in the epistemic sphere, the figure of St. Thomas widely overshadowed that of Suarez, which promoted an authentic disregard of his original thesis; b. like Thomas Aquinas, the Spanish Jesuit founded the division of speculative sciences in the intellectual act of abstraction; c. the difference between both metaphysical ideas did not necessarily imply a different epistemic understanding. However, in the 21st century, there appears another text which emphasizes the crucial difference of the Jesuit’s philosophy of the 16th century, who, in medieval letters, writes and thinks in permanent tension between the inheritance of the ancient and medieval philosophy on the one hand, and a neo-scholasticism with Renaissance airs on the other. Therefore, although his thinking goes through an Aristotelian tradition of knowledge, the understanding of science is based on an objective base, unlike Thomas Aquinas. Based on this premise, the following research work will exclusively deal with the epistemic originality of Suarez, following the division of speculative and real sciences, and in this way, which shows the order, the principle, and the existing relations between the physical, mathematical and metaphysical sciences. Durante los últimos decenios del siglo XX la filosofía de Francisco Suárez fue considerada parte integrante de un movimiento escolástico comúnmente mencionado como escuela tomista. La perspectiva de abordaje, según el mote impuesto, colocaba la posición especulativa del Dr. Eximio más próxima al dominico Tomás de Aquino de acuerdo con los siguientes matices: a. en el ámbito epistémico la figura del Aquinate eclipsaba ampliamente aquella de Suárez, promoviendo una auténtica desconsideración de sus tesis originales; b. el jesuita español fundaba, igual que Tomás de Aquino, la división de las ciencias especulativas en el acto intelectual de abstracción; c. la diferencia entre ambas concepciones metafísicas no implicaba necesariamente una comprensión epistémica distinta. Ahora bien, contra estas interpretaciones aparece en el siglo XXI otra lectura, donde se acentúa la diferencia decisiva de la filosofía del jesuita del siglo XVI, quien, en letras medievales, escribe y piensa en permanente tensión entre la herencia de la filosofía antigua y medieval por una parte, y una neo-escolástica de aires renacentistas por la otra. De acuerdo con ello, si bien su pensamiento discurre por una tradición aristotelizante del saber, la comprensión de las ciencias se asienta, a diferencia de Tomás de Aquino, en clave objetiva. Sobre esta premisa, el siguiente estudio abordará con exclusividad la originalidad epistémica de Suárez según la división de las ciencias especulativas y reales, mostrando el orden, el principio y las relaciones entre las ciencias física, matemática y metafísica. application/pdf https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/7310 10.34096/petm.v40.n2.7310 spa Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/7310/6560 Patristica et Mediævalia; Vol. 40 Núm. 2 (2019); 45-63 2683-9636 Francisco Suárez física matemática metafísica abstracción formal Francisco Suárez physics mathematics metaphysics formal abstraction Division, object and abstraction of speculative sciences according to Francisco Suárez División, objeto y abstracción de las ciencias especulativas según Francisco Suárez info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=patris&d=7310_oai |
| institution |
Universidad de Buenos Aires |
| institution_str |
I-28 |
| repository_str |
R-145 |
| collection |
Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) |
| language |
Español |
| orig_language_str_mv |
spa |
| topic |
Francisco Suárez física matemática metafísica abstracción formal Francisco Suárez physics mathematics metaphysics formal abstraction |
| spellingShingle |
Francisco Suárez física matemática metafísica abstracción formal Francisco Suárez physics mathematics metaphysics formal abstraction Mendoza, José María Felipe Division, object and abstraction of speculative sciences according to Francisco Suárez |
| topic_facet |
Francisco Suárez física matemática metafísica abstracción formal Francisco Suárez physics mathematics metaphysics formal abstraction |
| description |
During the last decades of the twentieth century, Francisco Suárez’s philosophy was part of a scholastic movement commonly referred to as Thomistic School. The approach perspective, as it is commonly known, placed the speculative position of Suarez closer to the one of the Dominican St. Thomas Aquinas, according to the following nuances: a. in the epistemic sphere, the figure of St. Thomas widely overshadowed that of Suarez, which promoted an authentic disregard of his original thesis; b. like Thomas Aquinas, the Spanish Jesuit founded the division of speculative sciences in the intellectual act of abstraction; c. the difference between both metaphysical ideas did not necessarily imply a different epistemic understanding. However, in the 21st century, there appears another text which emphasizes the crucial difference of the Jesuit’s philosophy of the 16th century, who, in medieval letters, writes and thinks in permanent tension between the inheritance of the ancient and medieval philosophy on the one hand, and a neo-scholasticism with Renaissance airs on the other. Therefore, although his thinking goes through an Aristotelian tradition of knowledge, the understanding of science is based on an objective base, unlike Thomas Aquinas. Based on this premise, the following research work will exclusively deal with the epistemic originality of Suarez, following the division of speculative and real sciences, and in this way, which shows the order, the principle, and the existing relations between the physical, mathematical and metaphysical sciences. |
| format |
Artículo publishedVersion |
| author |
Mendoza, José María Felipe |
| author_facet |
Mendoza, José María Felipe |
| author_sort |
Mendoza, José María Felipe |
| title |
Division, object and abstraction of speculative sciences according to Francisco Suárez |
| title_short |
Division, object and abstraction of speculative sciences according to Francisco Suárez |
| title_full |
Division, object and abstraction of speculative sciences according to Francisco Suárez |
| title_fullStr |
Division, object and abstraction of speculative sciences according to Francisco Suárez |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Division, object and abstraction of speculative sciences according to Francisco Suárez |
| title_sort |
division, object and abstraction of speculative sciences according to francisco suárez |
| publisher |
Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| url |
https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/7310 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=patris&d=7310_oai |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT mendozajosemariafelipe divisionobjectandabstractionofspeculativesciencesaccordingtofranciscosuarez AT mendozajosemariafelipe divisionobjetoyabstracciondelascienciasespeculativassegunfranciscosuarez |
| _version_ |
1851375415248027648 |