A Trap (for Lamartine): Critique of Ontology from the Literature

This work tries to rehearse a critique towards the fundamental ontology in Brazilian literature, focusing on the novel written by Carlos Sussekind, Trap for Lamartine (1975) and to point out at another novel by same author, What do you think he did (1994), whose publications distanced themselves abo...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Costi Pandolfo, Alexandre
Formato: Artículo publishedVersion
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/interlitteras/article/view/7137
https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=interlit&d=7137_oai
Aporte de:
id I28-R145-7137_oai
record_format dspace
spelling I28-R145-7137_oai2025-11-17 Costi Pandolfo, Alexandre 2019-10-01 This work tries to rehearse a critique towards the fundamental ontology in Brazilian literature, focusing on the novel written by Carlos Sussekind, Trap for Lamartine (1975) and to point out at another novel by same author, What do you think he did (1994), whose publications distanced themselves about 20 years in time. These novels, which can be understood as discontinuous continuation of one another, are offered here as time, space and matter for the crisis and criticism of the metaphysics of presence, the representational tradition and the logic of authenticity, whose concepts make up the ontological cunning constructions, which were absolute for the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. Este trabalho procura ensaiar uma crítica à ontologia fundamental na literatura brasileira através da abordagem do romance de Carlos Sussekind, Armadilha para Lamartine (1975) e apontando para outro romance do autor, Que pensam vocês que ele fez (1994), cujas publicações distanciam-se cerca de 20 anos no tempo. Tais romances, que podem ser entendidos como continuação descontínua um do outro, oferecem-se aqui como tempo, espaço e matéria para a crise e a crítica da metafísica da presença, da tradição representacional e da lógica da autenticidade, cujos conceitos perfazem as ardilosas construções ontológicas que foram cabais para os séculos XX e XXI. application/pdf https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/interlitteras/article/view/7137 10.34096/interlitteras.n1.7224 spa Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/interlitteras/article/view/7137/6384 Inter Litteras; Núm. 1 (2019); 116-129 2683-9695 0328-8935 Armadilha Memória Ontologia Literatura brasileira Trap Memory Ontology Brazilian literature A Trap (for Lamartine): Critique of Ontology from the Literature Uma Armadilha (para Lamartine): crítica à ontologia na literatura brasileira info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=interlit&d=7137_oai
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-145
collection Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)
language Español
orig_language_str_mv spa
topic Armadilha
Memória
Ontologia
Literatura brasileira
Trap
Memory
Ontology
Brazilian literature
spellingShingle Armadilha
Memória
Ontologia
Literatura brasileira
Trap
Memory
Ontology
Brazilian literature
Costi Pandolfo, Alexandre
A Trap (for Lamartine): Critique of Ontology from the Literature
topic_facet Armadilha
Memória
Ontologia
Literatura brasileira
Trap
Memory
Ontology
Brazilian literature
description This work tries to rehearse a critique towards the fundamental ontology in Brazilian literature, focusing on the novel written by Carlos Sussekind, Trap for Lamartine (1975) and to point out at another novel by same author, What do you think he did (1994), whose publications distanced themselves about 20 years in time. These novels, which can be understood as discontinuous continuation of one another, are offered here as time, space and matter for the crisis and criticism of the metaphysics of presence, the representational tradition and the logic of authenticity, whose concepts make up the ontological cunning constructions, which were absolute for the twentieth and twenty-first centuries.
format Artículo
publishedVersion
author Costi Pandolfo, Alexandre
author_facet Costi Pandolfo, Alexandre
author_sort Costi Pandolfo, Alexandre
title A Trap (for Lamartine): Critique of Ontology from the Literature
title_short A Trap (for Lamartine): Critique of Ontology from the Literature
title_full A Trap (for Lamartine): Critique of Ontology from the Literature
title_fullStr A Trap (for Lamartine): Critique of Ontology from the Literature
title_full_unstemmed A Trap (for Lamartine): Critique of Ontology from the Literature
title_sort trap (for lamartine): critique of ontology from the literature
publisher Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires
publishDate 2019
url https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/interlitteras/article/view/7137
https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=interlit&d=7137_oai
work_keys_str_mv AT costipandolfoalexandre atrapforlamartinecritiqueofontologyfromtheliterature
AT costipandolfoalexandre umaarmadilhaparalamartinecriticaaontologianaliteraturabrasileira
AT costipandolfoalexandre trapforlamartinecritiqueofontologyfromtheliterature
_version_ 1851376540758048768