Why ñot? Negation as incompatibility and non-deterministic matrices
The aim is to present a number of thoughts about the meaning of negation. I argue that the best characterization of this concept is grounded in the notion of incompatibility, which compels us to considerate negation as an exclusion-expressing device. I show that is possible to conceive negation in t...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/CdF/article/view/6501 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=cufilo&d=6501_oai |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The aim is to present a number of thoughts about the meaning of negation. I argue that the best characterization of this concept is grounded in the notion of incompatibility, which compels us to considerate negation as an exclusion-expressing device. I show that is possible to conceive negation in this way without having to accept, as Berto & Restall do, that it is a modal operator. For this I introduce algebraic non-deterministic matrices and explain how them allow us to model an exclusion-expressing device in the context of many-valued semantics, without having a negation that is not any more an extensional operator. |
|---|